We measured chromatic contrast thresholds in five locations within 10° of visual field (a central circular test field subtending 2° of visual angle, zone 0; and four 5°–10° testing locations, zone 1; displayed as shown in
Fig. 2 ). Psychophysical chromatic sensitivity was tested in a randomly interleaved manner for each contrast axis. The red-green pathway was tested with two distinct procedures by modulating contrast close to the protan and deutan axes (averages across these two were used as an estimate of red-green CS). Staircase vector extreme coordinates in the CIE 1931
x,
y color space were as follows: protan,
x = 0.433,
y = 0.295; deutan,
x = 0.371,
y = 0.243. The blue-yellow stimulus was modulated close to the tritan axis (extreme CIE 1931
x,
y chromaticity coordinate
x = 0.254,
y = 0.197). The white starting point was
x = 0.306,
y = 0.314. Mean background luminance and stimulus luminance were set equally to 22.20, 41.50, and 6.75 cd/m
2 for protan, deutan, and tritan axes, respectively, to obtain nearly identical average cone quantal catches at 2° and 10° (9.79 ± 0.64 [SD] log quanta · s
−1 · cone
−1 for 2° stimulus and 9.82 ± 0.66 [SD] log quanta · s
−1 · cone
−1 for 10°). Therefore, chromatic pathways
20 21 could be compared at approximately the same adapting level. The effective quantal catch produced in each cone by each primary was calculated by multiplying the Stockman and Sharpe cone fundamentals for 2° or 10° with the emission spectra of the three phosphors and a constant,
k, and by integrating the product over wavelength.
22 23 The constant,
k, is different for each cone, depending on the product of the ocular media transmittance and the absolute absorption coefficients for the wavelength of the maximal absorption probability for each cone. The emission spectra of the red, green, and blue phosphors of the monitor were measured separately in steps of 1 nm with a calibrated spectroradiometer (CRS SpectroCAL, Rochester, UK).