Figure 7shows photomicrographs of representative retinal histology for each study group, and
Figures 8 and 9summarize ONL and INL thicknesses among groups. The ONLs of the eyes from the two control groups showed areas of one to three cell rows as well as areas where the ONL was absent. Pyknotic nuclei and cellular debris were prevalent in the ONL of these groups. These observations were more pronounced in the inactive IDDI-treated eyes. The ONL thickness showed no statistically significant difference between these two control groups (
P = 0.09). Although not statistically significant, the observable differences in ONL thickness between the nonsurgical and inactive IDDI animals
(Fig. 8A)suggest that the implantation procedure of an inactive intravitreal implant was associated with reduced photoreceptor viability. Eyes implanted with FA 0.2 μg/d demonstrated preserved ONL morphology, containing five to seven rows of photoreceptor cells; the ONL was 2.1 ± 0.5 times thicker than in nonsurgical control eyes (
P < 0.001) and 3.4 ± 0.7 times thicker than in the eyes that received inactive IDDIs (
P < 0.0001). Eyes implanted with FA 0.5 μg/d, had an intermediate preservation of the ONL, showing three to five cell rows; the ONL was 1.5 ± 0.1 times thicker than in nonsurgical control eyes (
P < 0.05) and 2.4 ± 0.4 times thicker than in the eyes that received inactive IDDIs (
P < 0.01). The ONL thickness of the FA 0.2 μg/d–treated eyes appeared significantly greater than in the FA 0.5 μg/d–treated eyes (
P < 0.05). Left (untreated) eyes of the inactive IDDI-treated group showed significantly lower ONL thickness, than in the left eyes of all other groups (
P < 0.05). ONL thicknesses of the left eyes of the FA-treated groups were not significantly different from each other or from the nonsurgical group. INL thickness was not significantly different between groups (
P > 0.4).