Two observers (NGS and CFB) qualitatively reviewed the disc photographs incorporating the SD-OCT delineations and the disc margin delineations. This was performed to assess how well the colocalized SD-OCT NCO or border tissue delineations aligned to the disc margin. The observers classified good alignment as where there was less than a glyph’s diameter separation between the SD-OCT glyph (either NCO or border tissue) and the nearest adjacent disc margin glyph in all disc sectors. When the two-dimensional SD-OCT image was projected onto the disc photograph in the purpose-built disc margin delineation software, a universal 1:1 pixel ratio was applied. This was performed so as to negate any discrepancy in glyph diameter caused by SD-OCT scaling issues related to differences in monkey axial lengths. The glyphs in this program are 5 pixels in diameter, which means that this is the minimum resolvable separation between adjacent glyphs. Disc sectors were defined according to 0° (vertical), 45°, 90° (horizontal), and 135° axes applied to the clinical photograph, generating superior, inferior, superotemporal, inferotemporal, temporal, nasal, superonasal, and inferonasal disc sectors. Where the SD-OCT NCO delineations aligned to the disc margin delineations, the NCO was defined as the anatomic basis for the disc margin in that region. Where both the NCO and the termination of an externally oblique border tissue had been marked, the landmark most closely aligned to the disc margin delineation was defined as the anatomic basis of the disc margin in that region. In eyes in which good alignment was not observed for 360° of the disc margin, the number of sectors where there was less than one glyph diameter separation between SD-OCT and disc margin glyphs was recorded. To identify causes for discrepancy in these regions of the disc, the relevant stereophotographs and B-scans were systematically reexamined.