The utility of computerized image analysis for the objective quantification of endothelial morphometry was perceived very early on, after the development of SM,
11,12 and then it became commonplace with the generalization of computers. Before SM was used, naked-eye observation of the endothelium allowed assessment of only polymegethism and pleomorphism, which could at best be graded in the categories low, moderate, and high. Image-analysis programs quantify morphometry of objects using many parameters, of which the most common are area, perimeter, length of sides (by calculating, for each, their mean and variance), number of neighbors, form factor, cell elongation, and deviation.
11,13 In common practice, derived from clinical use of commercial SM and the accompanying analysis software programs, only two criteria are used: coefficient of variation (CV) of percentage of cell area = standard deviation of area/mean area (in square millimeters), and the percentage of hexagonal cells, often called hexagonality, even though these are probably too restrictive to exhaustively describe endothelial morphometry.
13,14 The importance of the relationship between morphometry and endothelial cell function has been discussed for more than 25 years
11,15,16 and direct involvement of morphometric modifications in edematous decompensation of the cornea has been demonstrated in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
17 and primitive endothelial dystrophies.
18,19 Conversely, it has been shown that large CV variations in long-term contact lens wearers have no impact on endothelial permeability and its deswelling capacity.
20 The influence of morphometric parameters on graft endothelium quality is unknown. To date, it has only been recommended that graft tissues presenting high polymegethism be excluded.
21 We thought it was of paramount importance to determine whether there are pleomorphism and polymegethism thresholds that would influence graft survival that could constitute meeting graft discard criteria. We believe that this question is particularly crucial for graft tissue with ECD close to the discard threshold (generally, 2000–2400 cells/mm
2, depending on the bank). To address this point, we thought it was first necessary to know the criteria variation spectrum given by endothelium assessment tools in eye banks and to ensure that these criteria were valid. Unlike storage at 4°C, for which specular image analyzers have long been used and the morphometric criteria are known, the routine image analysis of optic microscope micrographs obtained in OC is nascent in Europe. Last, even in the case of SM, these thresholds are not yet defined. Even in large-scale American clinical trials such as the Cornea Donor Study (CDS), graft inclusion criteria relative to endothelial morphometry are still subjective: Pleomorphism and polymegethism must be no more than moderate.