Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science Cover Image for Volume 50, Issue 7
July 2009
Volume 50, Issue 7
Free
Erratum  |   July 2009
ERRATUM
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science July 2009, Vol.50, 3136. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      User Alerts
      You are adding an alert for:
      ERRATUM
      You will receive an email whenever this article is corrected, updated, or cited in the literature. You can manage this and all other alerts in My Account
      The alert will be sent to:
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation
      Citation

      ERRATUM. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(7):3136.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
    • Get Permissions
  • Supplements
Erratum in: “Optic Disc Progression in Glaucoma: Comparison of Confocal Scanning Laser Tomography to Optic Disc Photographs in a Prospective Study” by Chauhan et al. ( Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:1682–1691.) 
In Figure 1 , the liberal criterion for the Topographic Change Analysis requires the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least ≥0.5% (not ≥0.1%) of the disc area (DA). This is consistent with the legend and the rest of the manuscript. The corrected figure is printed below. 
Figure 1.
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
Figure 1.
 
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
View OriginalDownload Slide
Figure 1.
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
View OriginalDownload Slide
 
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
Figure 1.
 
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
Criteria for the TCA of the HRT and expert observers in classifying progression. For example, the most liberal TCA criteria required the largest cluster of significant red superpixels to be at least 0.5% of the disc area (DA) with a depth change of ≥20 μm. The most liberal criteria for the expert observers was a classification of probably no change, probably change, or definitely change (score, 1, 2, or 3).
View OriginalDownload Slide
Copyright 2009 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Copyright © 2025 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy.Accept