Previous studies of rodent
25 and feline
14 retinas revealed three layers of alternative hyper-, hypo-, and hyperintensity. These data were obtained using conventional T
1- and/or T
2-weighted sequences on a 4.7- and a 7-T animal scanner, where gradient strengths (40 G/cm) were much stronger than those on clinical scanners. Strong gradients allowed a small FOV and shorter readout time, yielding a resolution of 60 × 60 × 1000 μm for rodent retina
25 and 100 × 100 × 2000 μm for feline retina.
14 Retinal MRI of the anesthetized baboon retina at 100 × 200 × 2000 μm on a clinical 3-T scanner has also been reported, demonstrating hardware feasibility of high spatiotemporal resolution anatomic, blood-flow, and BOLD MRIs on a 3-T clinical scanner.
31 Anatomic MRI of the baboon retina also revealed a similar three layers of alternative hyper-, hypo-, and hyperintensity. The total retina/choroid thicknesses (in μm) of the rodent, feline, baboon, and human retinas have been reported to be, respectively, 267 ± 33,
25 358 ± 13,
14 617 ± 101,
31 and 711 ± 37 (this study) (mean ± SD).
We were encouraged by the spatial resolution of 100 × 200 × 2000 μm in the human retina, given that the human eye is significantly larger in diameter and the human retina is significantly thicker compared with that of rodents. The PVE due to the curvature of the human retina for the 2000-μm-thick MRI slice is negligible (∼5% of total thickness),
25 whereas a 600-μm-thick slice in the rodent retina is needed to yield the same 5% PVE.
25 For the in-plane resolution, 100 × 200 μm yielded 6.6 × 3.3 pixels across the human retina/choroid thickness. The higher resolution was placed along the thickness of the posterior pole of the retina. By comparison, 60 × 60-μm in-plane resolution in rodent retina yielded 4.5 × 4.5 pixels across the retinal thickness.
25 Thus, the MRI resolution of the human retina was overall favorable, or at least comparable, to those used in animal studies, despite the apparent hardware limitations and eye movement in awake humans. MR images of the human retina, however, appeared more blurry than those of rodents, felines, and baboons. This is likely due to the long readout time used to maximize signal sensitivity and this problem must be addressed in future studies.
MRI data of rodent,
25 feline,
14 and baboon
31 retinas all showed three layers of alternating hyper-, hypo-, and hyperintensity, despite different pulse sequences and parameters. Specifically, the baboon and human retinal data both used the bSSFP sequence, yielded similar interleaving hyper-, hypo-, and hyperintensity in the retina. bSSFP is more efficient and yielded better SNR per unit time compared with conventional gradient-echo sequences. Based on these similarities in MRI layers across different animal species, similar layer assignments were thus made. Layer 1 (hyperintense) closest to the vitreous likely corresponded to nerve fiber, ganglion cell, and INL; layer 2 (hypointense) strip likely corresponded to the ONL and inner and outer segments; layer 3 (hyperintense) likely corresponded to the choroid.
Unlike animal studies where layer assignment and thickness of the MRI bands could be cross-validated by histology, direct validation of human layer assignments and thicknesses is difficult. Thus, noninvasive OCT was used to corroborate total retina/choroid thickness on the same eyes over closely matched regions. Commercial OCT devices use an 800- to 850-nm wavelength light source, where the choroid is difficult to visualize due to strong tissue absorption/scattering of visible light. The OCT device in our study used a less common, longer-wavelength (1060 nm) laser with less tissue absorption and scattering, which allowed better visualization of the deeper choroid layer.
41 Our OCT data are in general agreement with published OCT data. The published thickness of the in vivo human neural retina (excluding the choroid) varied significantly, even within the OCT literature: 236 μm
42 and 200 to 310 μm.
43 This is likely due to the heterogeneity of the human populations and different regions of the retinas from which the thickness were derived. Reports of the in vivo human choroidal thickness are sparse but have been reported to be 293 to 307 μm by partial coherence interferometry
44 and 318 to 335 μm by OCT.
45 Together, the total retinal thickness including the choroid ranged from 500 to 650 μm in the literature.
42 –45
In our study, retina/choroid thickness measured by MRI was greater than that determined by OCT over a similar region of the same eye, likely because MRI PVE overestimates layer thicknesses. PVE can be minimized by increasing spatial resolution and suppressing the vitreous signals. The uncertainty in identifying the outer choroidal boundary by OCT as well as errors in estimating the refractive index or direction of light travel could also contribute to the apparent discrepancy in OCT thickness. Finally, it should be noted that the retinal layer thicknesses vary considerably depending on location.