There is no anatomical basis for predicting the degree of mechanical independence of groups of EOM fibers. Skeletal muscles are considered to encompass four morphologies of fiber orientation: parallel, convergent, pennate, and sphincter.
16 Although EOMs differ in many respects from skeletal muscles, their fiber organization is generally regarded to have a roughly parallel arrangement that might be supposed to have some independence among fibers. Various claims have been made about the anatomical degree to which EOM fibers are mutually coupled longitudinally and transversely. Observations based upon serial transverse sections of undisturbed, whole human and monkey orbits suggest that rectus EOM fibers are arranged in roughly parallel bundles.
17,18 Mayr et al.
19 studied teased fiber preparations of cat EOMs, and reported that while all OL fibers run from tendon to tendon, in the GL only the multiply-innervated fibers (MIFs) do so, while the singly-innervated fibers (SIFs) are usually arranged in series of two or three fibers interconnected by myomyous junctions with frequent fiber splitting. Mayr et al.
19 also observed end-to-side connections between SIFs and MIFs. In the approximately 22-mm long isolated superior rectus (SR) OL of a juvenile rabbit, Davidowitz et al.
20 traced 94 fibers in four fascicles of the and found the SIFs to extend 5 to 8 mm in length, and MIFs to extend 10 to 19 mm in length. Davidowitz et al. observed several instances fiber splitting in MIFs.
20 Based upon myosin expression in rabbit EOM, McLoon et al. proposed a complex variety of fiber morphologies, with some extending the entire EOM length, and other shorter fibers in series arrangement.
21 Harrison et al., reported that individual EOM fibers of rabbit and monkey are shorter than the overall EOM, and in rabbit SR change their relationships with adjacent fibers along their longitudinal course.
22 Regardless of the arrangement of EOM fibers, and regardless of the presence of connective tissue within EOMs, anatomical studies cannot be decisive regarding the overall mechanical behavior of EOM subgroups considered on a larger scale. This issue can only be resolved by direct biomechanical measurements of EOM compartments that have not heretofore been available.