The large number of AMD participants with a wide range of fundus changes allowed us to divide our cohort into a substantial number of study groups (13 groups, see Table),
1 thus enabling us to correlate the broad variation of the fundus changes with the outcomes of the selected functional assays. Although there were small numbers in some groups, the smallest having 12 cases (see Table), we were able to identify significant differences even in comparisons of functional outcomes involving small groups (
Fig. 1). The order of the study groups in the Table is based on clinical and epidemiologic evidence for the risk of AMD progression. As such, our ordinal severity scale, represented by the group sequence, neither implies equal spacing between the groups, nor is meant to be a representation of severity order of the disease structure-functional changes. Subsequently, when clinical groups were sorted by functional outcomes, we found that each test depicted a specific rank-order of functional impairment across the clinical groups (
Fig. 2). Outcomes of all functional tests exhibited significant linear trends with increasing severity of fundus grading (
P < 0.001,
Fig. 2). Performance on dynamic testing of adaptation, however, was abnormal very early on in the clinical severity ranking, with significantly poorer function being seen as early as in eyes with only hard drusen evident, becoming progressively worse with intermediate then soft drusen (groups 1–4;
Figs. 2C,
2D; linear trend,
P < 0.001) and then plateauing at a low level of function that remained stable despite more severe clinical stages (groups 4–13;
Figs. 2C,
2D; linear trend, CRR
P = 0.50 and RRR
P = 0.08). Steady state tests (F14Hz and BCT), on the other hand, showed a gradual decline in visual function with increasing severity of fundus grade (
Figs. 2A,
2B). This decline followed a linear trend (F14Hz and BCT
P < 0.001) and is reasonably consistent with our current clinical understanding of worsening signs of AMD.
2–6 Worsening function was evident with increasing size of drusen and when pigmentary abnormalities were added. However, test results for some groups were not in the order of what might have been considered increasing clinical severity.
2–6 For example, when looking at the results of steady state tests, group 12 (fellow eye has CNV) returns better outcomes than might have been predicted from the hierarchy of implied risk of progression based on clinical assessment. Whereas the worst AMD-related fundus changes in the study eye to produce the greatest loss of function was the group with DPED (group 9,
Fig. 2). The differences between clinical severity and various outcomes of functional tests imply that each testing modality may provide different information about the underlying pathologic processes.
28 These findings suggested that psychophysical assessment of visual function in AMD patients offers a valuable addition to the clinical estimation of the severity of fundus changes.