This work should be considered with the following limitations in mind. First, there is some displacement error at the outer edge of the specimen due to ESPI phase map reconstruction difficulties. This is unavoidable for cap sphere geometries such as this, but it does create considerable uncertainty at the edges of the posterior scleral shell near the clamp boundary. To minimize the effect of these errors, we positioned the ONH and peripapillary sclera at the center (apex) of the posterior scleral specimen when clamping it in the pressurization apparatus. This positioning, coupled with analyzing strains in a relatively narrow band around the ONH, ensures that the reported measurements are accurate and reliable.
22 Second, the pinhole model assumption underlying the ESPI compensation methodology used in this work
22 could be a source of error that limits the presented method's capabilities. However, our measurement uncertainty
22 of ±16 nm should be more than sufficient to capture scleral deformations with the displacement measurement precision and spatial resolution required for the sectorial and regional strain analyses presented herein. Third, we assumed that the sclera is incompressible to calculate one of the nine strain tensor components necessary for our analyses. Human sclera is composed of approximately 70% water,
29 which should result in only slight compressibility. Furthermore, this assumption is unlikely to lead to significant errors in the reported strain values since it affects computation of only one of the nine strain tensor components that form the strain values reported. Fourth, we assumed that the sclera is at a zero-strain state at 5 mm Hg IOP, so the strain values we report are likely lower than the true strain. Computational methods exist to estimate the pre-existing strains
30 at 5 mm Hg, but we did not apply them in this study because the regional and sectorial strain distributions that are the focus of this report should be unaffected by this assumption. Fifth, we assumed that the donor eyes were normal without confirming normality through an ophthalmic exam performed while the patient was living. This could prove crucial for studies on cellular activity or neural tissues, or those that are designed to detect differences due to treatments or disease states such as glaucoma. However, there are relatively few pathologies that are likely to significantly impact scleral biomechanics we report for ostensibly normal eyes, and these were broadly excluded based on next-of-kin questionnaire. Finally, we performed our scleral inflation testing at room temperature, which could affect the biomechanical response of the tissues. We could not heat the specimen bath, because the ESPI displacement measurement system we used is so sensitive that thermal convection currents in heated PBS induce measurement errors. The strain values we measured are reasonable and several previous studies have performed scleral testing at room temperature.
10,31 In any case, regional and sectorial strain variations we report should not be affected by testing temperature because all specimens were tested under identical conditions.