We enrolled 417 Australian and 310 Nepalese participants in this study. All cases in the Nepalese cohort presented with PACG, of which 53 cases were reported to have had an acute attack. In the Australian cohort, 129 cases were identified with PACG (35 with previous history of acute attack).
Table 1 displays the demographic characteristics and clinical data of the cases and controls for each cohort. No SNP deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in either cohort (
P > 0.05). The physical locations of the tag SNPs are presented in the
Figure.
The minor allele frequencies and allelic association
P values of typed SNPs in the Australian cohort are presented in
Table 2. Three SNPs in
eNOS showed significant association with PACG: rs3793342, T allele, with a
P value of 0.003 (odds ratio [OR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3–0.8); rs3918188, A allele, with a
P value of 0.014 (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–1.9); and rs7830, A allele, with a
P value = 0.007 (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–1.0). Only rs3793342 survived correction for multiple testing of 15 SNP (
P value of 0.001). However, after justifying the Australian cohort for age and sex, both rs3793342 and rs7830 were significant with a
P value of 0.001 and 0.003, respectively. One haplotype in the
eNOS gene also showed association with PACG in the Australian cohort, with a global
P value of 0.019. The CGCAATC haplotype conferred risk, with significant
P value of 0.009 (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9–2.4). This haplotype contained the risk alleles of all the three nominally associated SNPs (
Table 3).
When we further analyzed the association between eNOS and MMP-9 with PACG in the Australian cohort, a significant difference in the rate of PACG was found between individuals carrying the risk alleles of SNPs rs17576 in MMP-9 and rs3793342 in eNOS (105 individuals) with those who do carry the protective allele only (264 individuals) with P value of 0.048 (OR 2.8).
No statistically significant association was observed across the CYP1B1 or NTF4 loci.
The allele frequencies and association
P values of typed SNPs in the Nepalese cohort are presented in
Table 4. Two SNP from the
CYP1B1 gene were nominally significant: rs10916, G allele, with an OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.1–4.0,
P = 0.02); and rs162561, A allele, with an OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1–4.3,
P = 0.01). Both SNPs remained significant after adjustment for sex and age; however, did not survive Bonferroni correction. Similarly, in the
NTF4 gene one SNP, rs11669977 T allele, showed a
P value of 0.04 with OR of 1.5 (95% CI 1.0–2.4), but did not survive correction for the 15 SNPs typed. No significant associations were identified with
eNOS in this cohort.
In the Nepalese cohort, the global
P value for the haplotypes of all five SNP markers tested in
CYP1B1 gene was not significant (0.11). However, one haplotype, AGCAC, showed a nominally significant association with PACG, with a
P value of 0.02 (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.7–6.7,
Table 5), but did not survive correction for multiple testing of five haplotypes (corrected
P value of 0.1). The remaining genes did not show any significant haplotypic association in this cohort (data not shown).