Qualitative (
Fig. 2) and quantitative analyses of the ELM and ISe bands on SD-OCT revealed consistent and significant differences between STGD1 patients and age-matched controls. The thickness of the ELM band in the measured area (
Fig. 3F) was significantly greater (mean = 17.69 μm, SD = 4.23) in STGD1 patients, particularly in the three younger patients (P3, P10, P16) compared with unaffected individuals (mean = 11.45 μm, SD = 1.08,
P < 0.0001;
Fig. 3A). A mild downward trend in ELM thickness with age was noted (
r 2 = 0.21), while ELM thickness appeared to be relatively constant in the control group. In this same area, STGD1 patients exhibited a thinner (mean = 16.65 μm, SD = 2.34,
P < 0.0001) ISe band compared with unaffected individuals (mean = 20.64 μm, SD = 1.34,
P < 0.0001;
Fig. 3B). To assess the thickness of the ELM relative to the ISe, the calculated ratios of ELM/ISe in the patients were compared with the control ratios (
Fig. 3C). Ratios of ELM/ISe in unaffected individuals fell consistently within the 0.5 range, indicating a 1-to-2 relationship between the thickness of ELM and ISe bands on SD-OCT. Thickness ratios of ELM/ISe in STGD1 patients, while more variable, were significantly greater (
P < 0.0001) than the control group (
Fig. 3C). Band reflectance on SD-OCT was assessed by comparing the brightest pixel (vertical gray value profile peak) of the ELM and ISe bands (
Fig. 3G). To compare patients while accounting for scan normalization, reflectance values were compared as ratios for each patient. The reflectance ratios in STGD1 patients were significantly greater (
P < 0.0001) than those of the control group (
Fig. 3D). Quantitation in two patients, P10 and P23, was impossible due to progressed atrophy in the measurement area; however, ELM thickening and increased reflectivity was qualitatively observed in their respective SD-OCT scans in less-affected areas of the macula. Statistical results are summarized in
Table 2. Calculated ICCs revealed acceptable agreement between both observers for each measurement (
Table 3).