In the present study, repeated treatment with T-588 at doses of 3 to 30 mg/kg enhanced RGC survival without affecting IOP in an elevated IOP model in the rat. Moreover, T-588 prevented the death of RGCs in an optic nerve crush model in the rat.
We propose that at least three kinds of mechanisms underlie the neuroprotective action of T-588 in these experimental models. First, T-588 may promote the actions of endogenous neurotrophins in the retina after optic nerve crush. Gao et al.
14 showed that the upregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) occurred in the ganglion cell layer after optic nerve crush. T-588 does not stimulate neurotrophic factor production in astrocytes,
2 whereas T-588 potentiates the effect of NGF
2 and BDNF (Ukai W, unpublished data, 2002) in cultured cells. Second, T-588 may protect RGCs from glutamate neurotoxicity. The glutamate toxicity to mammalian RGCs has been well documented in various experimental models.
15 16 17 T-588, which is not a glutamate receptor antagonist, rescues rat cerebellar granular cells and hippocampal neurons from glutamate neurotoxicity (Ono S, unpublished data, 1996). Third, T-588 may act on glial cells. Recently, many investigators
18 19 20 have been interested in the interrelations between RGCs and glial cells such as Müller cells. Incidentally, Takuma et al.
2 demonstrated that T-588 protects cultured astrocytes against Ca
2+ reperfusion injury, and the effect is expressed through the ERK/mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway. It is possible that the effects of T-588 in the retina are due to specific upregulation of survival pathways through activation of ERK MAP kinase in glial cells.
It has been reported that a single treatment with T-588 at 100 mg/kg significantly minimizes the death of RGCs that is induced by elevation of IOP in the rat.
6 In the present study, we tried to determine whether repeated administrations of T-588 at lower doses could alleviate neuronal damage induced by two different kinds of initial insults, because it is well known that some neuroprotectants
21 22 23 have diverse systemic side effects, including psychological and gastrointestinal symptoms. However, at all study dosages, T-588 caused no observable systemic side effects.
In this study, we found a difference between optimal doses in the elevated IOP model and the crush model. We wonder whether this difference was caused by the change of glutamate homeostasis in these models. Martin et al.
24 reported that optic nerve transection causes rapid, massive RGC death with consequent acute retinal glutamate release and glutamate transporter (GT) upregulation, whereas IOP elevation may primarily affect GT (downregulation), with any effect on glutamate levels in the retina or vitreous occurring as a secondary phenomenon. Mawrin et al.
25 reported that mRNA levels of the retinal glutamate transporter GLT-1 increase in the early phase after optic nerve crush and decrease toward control level with time. These reports suggest that the change in glutamate homeostasis in a glaucoma model may be deeply implicated in RGC death. The ability of GT to maintain appropriate glutamate levels in a glaucoma model could be much lower than in optic nerve injury models. We conclude that the protection of retina from excitotoxicity is quite important for neuroprotection in a glaucoma model. Also, MK-801
26 27 showed neuroprotective properties in both an experimental glaucoma model and an optic nerve crush model. The optimal doses of the agent in each model are different: higher in the glaucoma model than in the crush model, as was the case with T-588. Furthermore, the effective dose of T-588 was higher in glutamate-induced neuronal cell death than in neurotrophic-factor–related cell damage such as serum-deprivation–induced neuronal cell death. Consequently, we believe that the highest dose (30 mg/kg) of T-588 may be necessary for neuroprotection in the elevated IOP model.
In the crush model, the primary insult is transient. The secondary degeneration, followed by initial insult, occurs gradually over several weeks.
28 29 It may be that apoptosis and/or elevation in the level of extracellular glutamate are the major contributors to the spread of secondary degeneration after CNS injury. Various pharmacologic agents such as
N-methyl-
d-aspartate (NMDA)–receptor antagonist, neurotrophic factors, and immunophilin ligand (e.g., FK506) have been tested as a neuroprotective approach.
8 26 28 30 Accordingly, the long-term treatment of T-588 in the crush model may protect RGCs from these various pathologic events, including release of glutamate. We believe that T-588 at 10 mg/kg may show multiple activities in the crush model.
In contrast, T-588 at 30 mg/kg did not enhanced RGC survival. Such a bell-shaped curve has been reported for BDNF,
29 31 α
2-agonists (brimonidine, clonidine),
32 and HU-211 (nonpsychotropic cannabinoid)
33 in an optic nerve crush model and in other models. It is thought that BDNF may limit its own neuroprotective potential by downregulation of Trk B or enhancement of free radical release and nitric oxide (NO) production after excessive BDNF application.
29 Although the true cause of the negative reaction of T-588 at 30 mg/kg for 4 weeks is not known, it may be due to loss of balance caused by some excessive reactions.
RGC survival rate after the rat optic nerve crush depends on diverse conditions such as severity and time of injury. Yoles and Schwartz
34 showed that moderate rat optic nerve crush injury leads to more than 90% loss of surviving RGCs within 5 days. Gellrich et al.
35 reported that neuron death directly correlates with both the force applied and the duration of the optic nerve lesion. In this study, RGC survival at 28 days after crush was approximately 40%. We believe that RGC survival in this study is appropriate for estimation of the effect of the agent.
In the optic nerve crush control group, remarkable changes in the optic nerve structure were seen around the crush site. Many glial cells had proliferated, sending irregular GFAP-positive cell processes into the crushed area, whereas a decrease in neuronal axons was seen in the whole optic nerve. In contrast, the optic nerves in the group treated with 10 mg/kg of T-588 remained nearly intact compared with the crushed control group. In this group, neither optic nerve atrophy nor glial cell proliferation was seen, and the GFAP-localizing pattern of the glial cells was regular as in the normal optic nerve. These results indicate that T-588 may have protective effects against crush damage to the optic nerve.
Astrocytes are the main cells that respond to various injuries in any neuronal system. In general, CNS trauma causes rapid swelling of the astrocytes, which hampers their normal functions, such as the regulation of extracellular ion levels, pH, and glutamate uptake.
36 37 38 These phenomena, in turn, are thought to lead to further damage to the neural tissue.
26 39 Furthermore, many studies indicate that glial cell proliferation, the formation of a glial scar, and the production of many different growth-inhibitory proteins contribute to regeneration failure after injury to the CNS.
40 These results suggest that T-588 may have some effect on astrocytes, may inhibit axonal degeneration, and may then promote axonal regeneration.
In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that T-588 has a neuroprotective effect in an elevated IOP model and an optic nerve crush model in the rat, and we believe that T-588 may act on both RGCs and astrocytes.
The authors thank Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd. for providing technical assistance with the histology.