Our results showed that the preoperative amplitudes and implicit times of all components of the FMERGs were markedly abnormal. The decreased macular retinal functions have been found to be partly reversible in different types of macular disease after vitrectomy,
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 or photocoagulation.
40 However, our results on eyes with DME showed that the visual acuity did not improve significantly until 12 months after vitrectomy, and the amplitude of the FMERG did not change for at least 12 months after surgery. There was, on the other hand, a significant reduction in the thickness in the macular region early after surgery.
Twelve months after surgery, the increase in mean amplitude of the b-wave was significant in eyes with a PVD created during surgery. In an earlier FMERG and OCT analysis of the macular area in eyes with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and an epiretinal membrane (ERM), the recovery of the b-wave of the FMERGs elicited by a 15°-stimulus was mainly correlated with the decrease in parafoveal thickness.
30 32 In this study, the retinal thickness was measured only at the fovea, and thus it is probably not appropriate to compare the changes in the foveal thickness to the FMERGs elicited by a 15° stimulus, even though the foveal thickness may be related to the overall morphologic condition of macular area in eyes with DME. In fact, the decreased foveal thickness was related to the final recovery of the b-wave as it has been in eyes with CNV and ERM.
37 39
The increase in the mean b/a ratio 12 months after surgery, and the decreased number of eyes with the negative-type FMERG (b/a < 1.0) resulted from an increase in the b-wave with relatively little change in the a-wave amplitude. One explanation for the association of the b-wave and retinal thickness was discussed previously.
37 Because longstanding functional damage and retinal ischemic change are probably present in the diabetic patient retina, the degree of recovery induced by the morphologic improvement may have been limited. Thus, compared with the OCT-determined retinal thickness, a delay or limited recovery of the b-wave amplitude of the FMERG might be expected.
A shortening of the implicit time of the b-wave was demonstrated after macular surgery in eyes with ERM, CNV, and macular holes (MH),
35 36 37 38 39 whereas the delay of the a- and b-wave implicit times was found in eyes with DME during the early postoperative period. One of the reasons for the delayed implicit time early after surgery may be the effect of the separation of the posterior hyaloid during the surgery. In eyes with an MH, a prolonged implicit time was found 6 weeks after surgery only when the internal-limiting membrane (ILM) was peeled.
38 In most of the OCT images of Stage 2 and 3 MH, the posterior hyaloid was already separated from the retina in the macular area. Thus, the creation of a total posterior vitreous detachment may not significantly affect macular retinal function, and only patients who had the ILM removed would demonstrate the delayed implicit time after surgery. On the other hand, the posterior hyaloid is completely attached at the macular area as the posterior wall of the vitreous pocket in eyes with DME.
41 Detachment of the posterior hyaloid from the macula during surgery may induce the delayed implicit time in a similar manner as ILM peeling in MH surgery.
38 In subhuman primates, the creation of a PVD leads to morphologic damage to the nerve fiber layer as demonstrated by immunofluorescent staining. This suggests that a posterior hyaloid detachment can affect retinal function.
42 The delay in implicit time recovered 6 months after vitrectomy for DME and surgery in this study and also after MH surgery with ILM removal in a previous study.
38 We cannot compare the three groups of eyes because the number of cases was very small, however, a significant delay in the early postoperative period was noted only in group 1 eyes. Another reason for the prolonged implicit time is likely to be retinal fragility, the result of metabolic and/or osmotic changes from surgery. Analysis of multifocal ERGs after vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema demonstrated delays in the responses which later recovers.
43
The good anatomic recovery from the edema probably prevented further deterioration of vision in many of our patients with DME, however, the time course and the extent of recovery in the visual acuity and FMERGs may be further delayed and limited. The limitations of this study include the small number of cases, and the use of 4 eyes from 2 patients as individual cases. In addition, the postoperative period was limited to 12 months and additional functional recovery may be expected if an improved anatomic structure is maintained. Another significant weakness of this study was the lack of controls. A comparison with the ETDRS suggested that the percentage of eyes that had improved vision of ≥3 lines was higher in this study. However, because of the small number of eyes we cannot come to a strong conclusion. The comparison of results from the different methods was not planned, but it was necessary to point out the disparity of anatomic recovery, and the delayed and limited improvement of retinal function that takes more than one year.
For future studies, the effect of a longer followup periods should be examined, and the effect of ILM removal on macular function with or without indocyanine green staining should be evaluated. In addition, intravitreal steroid injection for refractory DME has been reported recently and needs further study.
44 45 46
In conclusion, the time course and the degree of recovery of the morphologic and functional characteristics of the macula were different after vitrectomy in eyes with DME, i.e., there was a rapid and significant recovery of foveal thickness, but the visual acuity improved gradually and was significantly better only after 12 months. The increase in the mean b-wave amplitude of the FMERGs in eyes with a surgically created PVD was significant at 12 months. The increase in the b-wave was correlated to the decreased foveal thickness. This may suggest that part of the functional recovery was attributable to the decreased retinal thickness and the absorption of the subretinal fluid. However, the damage to the macular tissue may not recover significantly.