After 1 night of lens wear, myopia decreased significantly in the eyes wearing CRT (test) lenses (1.18 ± 0.81 D; paired
t-test:
P < 0.0001). There was no significant change in the eyes wearing the control lenses (
P > 0.05), as shown in
Figure 1 . During the recovery period after lens removal, myopia continued to be reduced by 0.84 D (71%) and 0.74 D (63%) after 3 hours and 12 hours, respectively.
After lens removal, the experimental and control corneas were thicker than baseline, as shown in
Figures 2 and 3 . The cornea exhibited maximum swelling on eye opening and steady deswelling throughout the day (F
(6,114) = 86.9;
P = 0.000).
Figure 4 shows that the amount of central corneal swelling differed between eyes (F
(1,19) = 8.5;
P = 0.0089), with greater central swelling induced by the control lens than by the CRT lens (6.9% ± 3.1% vs. 4.9% ± 2.0%, respectively, post hoc:
P < 0.005). Immediately after lens removal, clear differences in the distribution of the corneal swelling between the two lens designs were apparent (F
(8,136) = 2.10;
P = 0.039), as shown in
Figure 4 . A polynomial regression approach was used to quantify the percentage swelling by corneal position. To assist in the fitting of the polynomial, the intercepts were set to be 4.9% and 6.9% (mean central corneal swelling values for the CRT and control lens, respectively). Preliminary analysis showed that the linear components of the polynomials were not different from zero, and they were therefore not included in subsequent curve fitting. The results, with coefficients of determination, are also shown in
Figure 4 and the respective fits are the smoothed lines in each panel. As is apparent from the
r 2 values, the fits describe the data very well. The analysis showed that for both the CRT and control data, a parabolic component (
x 2) was present (
P < 0.001 and
P < 0.007 for CRT and control lenses, respectively). There were no significant cubic (
x 3) factors, but for the CRT lens data there was a quartic (
x 4) component that was highly significant (
P = 0.000).
The CRT lens design had significant effects on the epithelial thickness distribution, which depended on both corneal position and time (F
(48, 912) = 2.3;
P = 0.000), as demonstrated in
Figure 5 . Immediately after removal of the CRT lenses, the central epithelium was 5.1% ± 4.5% thinner than baseline (post hoc tests:
P < 0.005), as shown in
Figure 6 . Compared with baseline, the epithelium in the midperiphery of the test lens wearing eye showed significant thickening (1.9% on the temporal side and 2.4% on the nasal side, both
P < 0.006). The changes in epithelial thickness in the central and paracentral areas recovered to baseline approximately 3 hours after lens removal
(Fig. 5) . There was no significant change in epithelial thickness with the control lens during the study period (post hoc tests:
P > 0.05).