Blebbistatin was recently characterized as a small-molecule inhibitor of myosin II ATPase activity.
37 39 It is a potent inhibitor of skeletal muscle and nonmuscle myosin II isoforms, although it has little or no effect on smooth muscle myosin II and myosins from classes I, V, and X.
39 Because of its selectivity and high affinity for class II myosins, blebbistatin is regarded as an important pharmacological tool in exploring the role of myosin II ATPase in cells and tissues.
37 We therefore used blebbistatin to evaluate the specific role played by myosin II in maintenance of cell morphology and in actomyosin organization, cell adhesions and cell–cell junctions in TM and CB cells. Treatment of primary cultures of both porcine TM and CB cells with blebbistatin (10–200 μM for 2 hours) led to reversible alterations in cell morphology and decreases in actin stress fibers, focal adhesions and adherens junctions, without detectable cytotoxic effects
(Fig. 3) . The concentration of blebbistatin used in our studies (50–100 μM) has been reported to inhibit predominantly nonmuscle and skeletal muscle myosin II in vitro.
37 39 44 45 The effects of blebbistatin on TM cell morphology and actomyosin cytoskeletal organization observed in this study were consistent with the effects of the inhibitors of Rho kinase, protein kinase C, and MLCK on TM cells documented earlier.
17 27 33 However, unlike these inhibitors, which mediate their effects by inhibiting myosin II activity through decreased MLC phosphorylation,
17 27 33 34 blebbistatin (50–100 μM) mediates its effects without affecting the phosphorylation status of MLC in TM and CB cells
(Fig. 4) , confirming its specificity to myosin II ATPase activity. The TM and ciliary body tissues have been reported to exhibit distinct contractile responses when treated with external factors.
18 In this study, however, both the TM and CB treated with blebbistatin revealed similar responses in cell morphology, actin cytoskeletal reorganization, and cell adhesions. The concentration of drug needed for CB cells was relatively higher than the effective concentration required for response generation in TM cells
(Fig. 3) .