By conventional PCR, expression of all five types of muscarinic receptor was detected in cultured conjunctival epithelial cells, conjunctival fibroblasts, and limbal epithelial cells
(Fig. 2) . The identity of each PCR product was further confirmed by sequencing. Because none of the five MR genes has introns, the PCR product from genomic DNA would yield the same-sized amplicons. To rule out possible contamination by genomic DNA, we chose a pair of β-actin primers at two adjacent exons that spanned a 206-bp intron on cDNA derived from β-actin mRNA. A single 314-bp PCR product band for β-actin mRNA (without intron) was identified in all cDNA samples used.
Quantitative real-time PCR was used to compare the relative abundance of each MR subtype transcript in the different cell types. Compared to m1–m5 gene expression in monkey brain, the muscarinic receptor transcript levels in cultured limbal, conjunctival epithelial cells and conjunctival fibroblasts were very low (
P < 0.001; data not shown). As shown in
Table 3 , the normalized m1 expression level in cultured conjunctival epithelial cells and conjunctival fibroblasts was similar (
P > 0.05,
n = 3 for each cell type), but both were higher than that in cultured limbal epithelial cells (
P < 0.001). Similar levels of m2, m3, and m4 were observed in both epithelial cell types (
P > 0.05,
n = 3 for each cell type). Fibroblasts had higher levels of m2, m3, and m4 when compared to both epithelial cell types (
P < 0.01). RNA levels for m5 in limbal epithelial cells and in conjunctival fibroblasts were not significantly different (
P > 0.05,
n = 3 for each cell type); however, they were higher than the expression levels in conjunctival epithelial cells (
P < 0.001;
Table 3 ).
Although relative quantitative real-time PCR analysis is sufficient for the comparison of the expression of one gene among different samples, it is not suitable to assess the expression of multiple genes within one cell. To compare the relative abundance of m1–m5 transcripts in each of the above cell types, we designed another set of PCR primers
(Table 2)to amplify a segment of DNA, which contained the region that was amplified by real-time PCR for each of the muscarinic receptor subtypes. These PCR amplicons were purified, quantified, and used as templates to generate standard curves of cDNA input and C
T values. Using these individual standard curves, we further compared the number of copies of five muscarinic receptor subtypes within the same cell type. For the purpose of analysis, m1 expression in each cell type was set at 1. As shown in
Table 4 , in the conjunctival epithelial cells, the amount of mRNA of m5 was 24 times higher than that of m1 (
P < 0.001,
n = 9), whereas that of the other four subtypes was not significantly different from one another (
P > 0.05). In limbal epithelial cells, the amount of m5 and m4 was significantly higher than m1 (
P < 0.01,
n = 9) with no significant difference among m1, m2, and m3 (
P > 0.05). In conjunctival fibroblasts, the amount of m5 and m2 was higher than that of m1 (
P < 0.001,
n = 9), with no significant differences among the levels of m1, m3, and m4 (
P > 0.05;
Table 4 ).