Figure 5Ashows that little difference can be discerned between waveforms taken over a wide range of light levels from an animal 1 week before and 4 hours after MnCl
2 injection. The photoreceptoral response is analyzed by modeling the leading edge of the a-wave shown in
Figure 5B . No significant difference (
P > 0.05) was found between any of the time points assessed in this study for either phototransduction amplitude (
Fig. 5C ; baseline, –450 ± 31; 4 hours, –457 ± 17; 7 days, –430 ± 28 μV) or sensitivity (
Fig. 5D ; baseline, 3.41 ± 0.02; 4 hours, 3.45 ± 0.04; 7 days, 3.33 ± 0.03 log cd
–1 · m
2 · s
–3). The postreceptoral P2 response was analyzed by modeling the amplitude intensity response function as shown in
Figure 6A . The average P2 amplitude (
Fig. 6B , V
max; baseline, 1108 ± 63; 4 hours, 1104 ± 64; 7 days, 1157 ± 77 μV), semisaturation (
Fig. 6C 6K ; baseline, –3.17 ± 0.03; 4 hours, –3.21 ± 0.05; 7 days, –3.11 ± 0.03 log cd · s · m
–2), and slope (
Fig. 6D , n; baseline, 0.99 ± 0.03; 4 hours, 1.04 ± 0.05; 7 days, 0.97 ± 0.02) were not significantly (
P > 0.05) affected by systemic MnCl
2 injection at 4 hours or 7 days after treatment compared with baseline. Although not shown, analysis of oscillatory potential frequency (baseline, 106.6 ± 2.5; 4 hours, 111.7 ± 2.4; 7 days, 106.5 ± 3.2 Hz), RMS amplitude (baseline, 5.3 ± 0.2; 4 hours, 5.6 ± 0.1; 7 days, 5.4 ± 0.1 μV
2), and peak time (baseline, 33.4 ± 1.0; 4 hours, 31.4 ± 0.9; 7 days, 31.5 ± 1.3 ms) revealed no significant difference between baseline and either postinjection time point (
P > 0.05 for 4 hours and 7 days).