Abstract
purpose. To investigate the role of hyperglycemia in regulating the proliferative response of retinal endothelial cells (RECs) to insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I.
methods. The regulation of IGF-I signaling by glucose concentration was assessed by biochemical analysis of primary RECs grown in media containing normal (5 mM) and high (25 mM) glucose. Cell counting was used to asses the proliferative response to IGF-I.
results. Glucose (25 mM) enhanced the proliferative response of RECs to IGF-I. Phosphorylation of the adaptor protein Shc (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 1) was increased in RECs grown in high glucose. For Shc to be phosphorylated, it must be recruited to the cytoplasmic domain of the transmembrane protein SHPS-1 (SHP substrate-1). Shc recruitment to SHPS-1 was increased when RECs were grown in high glucose. The difference in Shc recruitment to SHPS-1 was attributable to a difference in SHPS-1 phosphorylation that is required for Shc recruitment. This, in turn, was attributable to an increase in SHPS-1 association with integrin-associated protein (IAP), which is necessary for SHPS-1 phosphorylation. The difference in response under the two different glucose conditions appeared to be attributable to changes in the activation of the integrin αVβ3, since blocking αVβ3 in high glucose inhibited the response to IGF-I, whereas addition of the active region of vitronectin to RECs grown in normal glucose enhanced their response.
conclusions. This study demonstrates that hyperglycemic conditions enhance the response of RECs to IGF-I by increasing the association of IAP with SHPS-1 permitting the formation of the SHPS-1–Shc signaling complex, which is required for the proliferative response to IGF-I.
The most common cause of blindness in patients with type 1 diabetes is proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) with the growth of unwanted blood vessels and intravitreous neovascularization (IVNV).
1 Formation of these new blood vessels requires retinal endothelial cell (REC) proliferation and migration.
2 Hyperglycemia appears to contribute directly to the neovascularization associated with PDR, since large clinical trials have shown that tight glucose control in diabetic patients reduces the progression of this disease.
3 Achieving and maintaining such tight glucose control is challenging, and retina ablation is currently the only therapy for direct treatment of PDR.
There is a significant amount of data to suggest that increases in insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I bioactivity may contribute to retinal neovascularization, characteristic of conditions such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity.
4 5 Retinal endothelial cells (RECs) express both IGF-I and IGF-I receptors (IGF-IRs). In a mouse model of oxygen-induced retinopathy it was shown that IGF-IR antagonists suppressed retinal neovascularization.
4 In a similar model, it has been shown that endothelial cell–specific knockout of the IGF-IR (and insulin receptor) protects against neovascularization.
5 There is some evidence to suggest that the effect of IGF-I is mediated at least in part by its ability to control vascular endothelial cell growth factor stimulated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation.
4 Although inhibiting IGF-I activity would seem like an attractive strategy for reducing neovascularization in these conditions, directly inhibiting IGF-I, or its receptor, is unlikely to be a viable approach, because this approach is likely to be associated with significant toxicity. Although inhibiting IGF-I signaling in endothelial cells is desirable, inhibiting IGF-I signaling in neurons, for example, where it is an important survival factor, would be undesirable.
6
We reasoned that identification of factors that specifically regulate the response of RECs to IGF-I may provide novel, cell-type–specific targets for the inhibition of IGF-I signaling. αVβ3 integrin is a marker of proliferating endothelial cells and αVβ3 antagonists have been shown to inhibit both retinal and tumor angiogenesis.
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 We have shown in smooth muscle cells (SMCs) that αVβ3 ligand occupancy is necessary for the positive effects of IGF-I on these cells. We have shown in SMCs that binding of the heparin-binding domain (HBD) of the principal αVβ3 ligand vitronectin (Vn) is sufficient for the positive effects of Vn on IGF-I signaling in these cells. Furthermore, it is an interaction between a cysteine loop region (C-loop region) of the extracellular region of β3 (between amino acids 177-184) and the Vn HBD that mediates the effects of Vn.
14 15 When binding between the Vn HBD and the C-loop region is blocked in the presence of an antibody raised specifically against the C-loop region of β3, IGF-I stimulated migration and proliferation of SMCs is inhibited.
15 The interaction between the Vn HBD and the C-loop region of β3 is distinct from the interaction between the RGD sequence of the integrin ligand and αVβ3. Previous studies have suggested that changes in levels of αVβ3 ligands may occur in response to hyperglycemia,
16 17 18 19 20 21 and we hypothesized that increases in αVβ3 ligand occupancy, under conditions of hyperglycemia, may contribute to enhanced REC proliferation, and therefore the development of PDR, by increasing the proliferative response to IGF-I.
An understanding of the molecular events that regulate the proliferation of RECs leading to PDR is essential for the identification of therapeutic targets and strategies. The purpose of this study was to determine whether hyperglycemia-induced changes in αVβ3 ligand occupancy regulate the proliferative response of RECs to IGF-I and to determine the molecular mechanism by which this regulation occurs.
RECs were plated on dishes coated with 50 μg/mL fibronectin in medium containing 5 mM glucose. The following day, the cells were fed with medium containing either 5 or 25 mM glucose. Forty-eight hours later, when the cell monolayers were approximately 80% confluent, cells were quiesced overnight in SFM before the addition of IGF-I (100 ng/mL) for the times indicated. In some experiments, RECs were treated with either the C-loop β3 antibody (1 μg/mL) or the anti-IAP monoclonal antibody B6H12 (10 μg/mL) or appropriate control IgG for 4 hours or Vn (1 μg/mL) or the Vn HBD (5–20 μg/mL) for 2 hours before the addition of IGF-I (100 ng/mL). Cell monolayers were lyzed with a modified radioimmunoprecipitation buffer. After centrifugation, lysates were used for immunoprecipitation with the appropriate antibody at 4°C. The proteins were visualized after SDS-PAGE and electrophoretic transfer by using Western immunoblot analysis.
Chemiluminescent images obtained were scanned (DuoScan T1200; AGFA Brussels, Belgium), and band intensities of the scanned images were analyzed using NIH Image, version 1.61 (available by ftp at zippy.nimh.nih.gov/ or at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image; developed by Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The Student’s t-test was used to compare differences between treatments. The results that are shown in all experiments are representative of at least three separate experiments.
Effect of Blocking IAP Association with SHPS-1 on Shc Phosphorylation and Cell Proliferation in Response to IGF-I