The Research Review Boards of the University of Rochester and University of Miami approved the study. Twenty-one subjects (10 women and 11 men, mean age: 32.1 ± 8.7 years) in good health and with no history of contact lens wear or any current ocular or systemic diseases were recruited in Rochester for a prospective study. Informed consent was obtained from each subject, and all were treated in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The temperature (15–25°C) and humidity (30%–50%) in the small consulting room where the study was conducted were controlled by central air conditioning and two humidifiers. OCT imaging was performed on one randomly selected eye of each subject at the same time of day on two consecutive days. A real-time corneal OCT, developed as described previously,
9 was used to perform vertical 12-mm scans across the central cornea (apex) including the upper and lower tear menisci simultaneously. During imaging, the subjects were exposed only to ambient room light and were asked to look at an external target. OCT images were recorded continuously when the subjects blinked normally for three to five blinks. After the normal blinks, the subjects were asked to delay each blink for as long as possible for another set of three to five blinks. After that, the study eye was given a drop of artificial tears (Refresh Liquigel; Allergan, Irvine, CA) followed by OCT scanning to obtain true corneal thickness for the calculation of the tear film thickness, as described in detail previously.
9 The selected eye of each subject was also photographed using a digital camera mounted on a slit lamp with a reference scale to measure the length of both upper and lower eyelids and the exposed ocular surface.
Image processing and data analysis were performed at the University of Miami by two of the authors (JW, JRP). Eight OCT images corresponding to a 1-second interval immediately before and after each blink were analyzed for measuring the total corneal thickness. One of these eight images showing upper and lower tear menisci
(Fig. 1)was processed with custom software to yield tear meniscus variables. Tear film thickness was estimated indirectly by subtracting the true corneal thickness imaged after the instillation of the artificial tears from total corneal thickness obtained at each check point.
9 Results immediately before and after two consecutive blinks during normal and delayed blinking sessions were obtained. Results from one interblink interval were obtained since two consecutive blinks formed one interblink interval. Seven variables were obtained including central tear film thickness (TFT), upper tear meniscus curvature (UTMC), height (UTMH), and cross-sectional area (UTMA), and lower tear meniscus curvature (LTMC), height (LTMH), and cross-sectional area (LTMA). Lengths of upper and lower lids and exposed ocular surface area were measured from the two-dimensional digital images of eyes using custom software after calibration. To use the two-dimensional image to estimate the area of the ocular surface that is curved in the third dimension, a multiplication factor of 1.294 was used, as suggested by Tiffany et al.
10 As upper and lower lids are also curved in the third dimension, the same factor was used for conversion of the two-dimensional values of upper and lower lid lengths to three-dimensional values. Preocular tear film volume (TFV) was calculated using the equation in
Table 1 , as suggested by Johnson and Murphy.
11 The lower tear meniscus volume (LTMV) was calculated as the same equation used by Mainstone et al.
6 The upper tear meniscus volume (UTMV) was calculated in the same way as the LTMV. Total tear volume on the ocular surface was the sum of these volumes. All formulas are listed in
Table 1 . The repeatability of the measurements of all variables during both normal and delayed-blinking sessions was estimated as the SD of the differences between repeated measurements between 2 days.
Data analysis was conducted on computer (Statistica; StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK). Two- or three-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (Re-ANOVA) was used for overall effects, and post hoc paired t-tests were used to determine whether there were pair-wise differences (P < 0.05).