In the present study, we used a case–control design, recruiting 140 of 150 consecutive patients with NAION and 280 control subjects between January 1992 and December 2006. Sample size was computed before the survey with a 95% confidence level (two-tailed test) and 86% statistical power to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 0.5, assuming a G6PD prevalence rate of 12%, as reported previously.
4 5 6 7 The case–control ratio was 1:2.
The inclusion criterion for the case group was the diagnosis of NAION, established by a history of sudden visual loss accompanied by findings of optic nerve edema (or pallor with a known history of disc edema) and characteristic retinal nerve fiber layer defects revealed by conventional automated visual field examination. All patients with NAION underwent a full ophthalmic evaluation, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit lamp examination, applanation tonometry, fundus biomicroscopy, fluorescein angiography, and automated visual field examination (Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2 test; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany). Visual field types were determined by a team of two readers (AP, AC). Medical conditions, including systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and cardio- and cerebrovascular status (presence of angina, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attacks, and stroke) were also recorded. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, non-Sardinian ancestry, and evidence of any other neurologic, systemic, or ocular disorder that could be responsible for optic disc edema and visual impairment.
Two age- and gender-matched control subjects per case were randomly selected from the cataract register. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, non-Sardinian ancestry, and previous history of AION, retinal vein occlusion, or retinal artery occlusion. All control subjects underwent standard ophthalmic evaluation, including BCVA, slit lamp examination, applanation tonometry, and fundus examination. Medical conditions, including systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and cardio- and cerebrovascular status (presence of angina, myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attacks, and stroke) were also recorded. Control subjects were recruited concurrently during the patients’ recruitment period.
Definitions used for systemic hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia are described elsewhere.
7
Institutional ethics review board approval was obtained, and the study was conducted in full accord with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Each participant received detailed information and provided informed consent before inclusion.
Red blood cell G6PD activity was determined with a quantitative assay (G6PD/6PGD; Biomedic snc, Sassari, Italy), as described previously.
7 Quantitative testing for G6PD deficiency is routinely performed in all patients admitted to our hospital.
Categorical values were compared by χ
2 test. The differences between cases and controls for quantitative variables were analyzed by Student’s
t-test. Conditional logistic regression analysis, including as covariates known risk factors for NAION, such as systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia, was used to determine the significance of the association between G6PD deficiency and NAION.
12 Conditional logistic regression models, including as covariates systolic or diastolic blood pressure, plasma glucose level, and cholesterol level, were also performed. Models including the gender × G6PD-deficiency interaction were fitted to test whether gender is an effect-modifier of G6PD deficiency. OR and 95% CI were calculated.
P ≤ 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with commercial software (Stata ver. 9.0; StataCorp, College Station, TX).
Seven percent of the NAION cases and 4% of the control subjects who were eligible for the study declined to participate. The major reason was “not interested.”