In mouse lenses fixed by immersion in paraformaldehyde, immunolabeling of BF proteins showed a progressive increase as fiber cells differentiated, followed by a precipitous drop in labeling at about the time that organelles are dismantled
(Fig. 4a) . This pattern suggested that the BFs might not be present in the OFZ, where the impact of BF knockouts was most evident. The apparent absence of BFs in the very zone where fiber cell architecture is altered in the knockout complicated speculation about the role of BFs in stabilizing fiber cell shape. For this reason, we examined the status of BFs as a function of fiber cell birth date, examining cells deep into the OFZ for the presence or absence of BFs.
The very high concentration of cytoplasmic crystallins makes it difficult to identify BFs in conventionally processed tissue. To get around this, we examined “ghosts” of fiber cells, created by harvesting thick (150-μm) frozen sections into buffer, which allowed soluble crystallins to diffuse away. This methodology clearly reveals the underlying cytoskeleton. A cross-section of such a ghosted thick section is shown in
Figure 4b , which is stained with toluidine blue. The lens capsule (arrow) in such a preparation tends to curl up, distorting the bow region, but the nuclei of the fiber cells located in the bow region are evident. The crystallins of the cortex in the mouse lens are soluble and readily extracted, resulting in a very pale staining of the cortical region. In contrast, the crystallins of the nuclear region are not as readily extracted, and they stain intensely (right-hand part of the section). An electron micrograph taken from the region boxed in
Figure 4b , at the cortex-nuclear boundary, and far removed from the deepest nucleated fiber cell, is shown in
Figures 4c 4d . The transition from the well-extracted fiber cells of the cortex (at the left) to less well-extracted cells of the nucleus (at the right) is evident as an increase in cytoplasmic density. At higher magnification
(Fig. 4d) , these fiber cells can be seen to have a rich BF cytoskeleton criss-crossing the cytoplasm. The identity of these BFs is confirmed in
Figure 4g , by immunogold labeling of the frozen section with antibodies to BF proteins. Thus, BFs are clearly present in regions that are not immunoreactive in
Figure 4a .
We envisioned two possible explanations for the absence of immunoreactivity seen in regions rich in BFs. First, phakosin and filensin experienced proteolytic damage with age, leaving the BF structurally intact but eliminating epitopes targeted by these antibodies. Second, fixation of the deeper cortex, where crystallin density is higher than superficial cortex, produced a barrier to antibody penetration, masking epitopes, a phenomenon noted by Beebe et al.
30
To test this, we compared the relative immunoreactivity of frozen sections that had been extracted with buffer to remove soluble crystallins
(Fig. 4e)with those that had been fixed immediately in paraformaldehyde
(Fig. 4f)to minimize the extraction of crystallins. These sections were then embedded in paraffin and sectioned for immunocytochemistry.
Figure 4e , where crystallins had been extracted, shows very intense phakosin labeling all the way through to the nuclear-cortical boundary (brown reaction product). In contrast, sections that were fixed immediately showed heavy labeling only in the outer cortex, where crystallin density was low, and at the immediate surface of the section, where some diffusion occurred when sections were placed in fixative
(Fig. 4f) . (Only one surface is labeled because the sections floated.) The heavily labeled region in the outer cortex
(Fig. 4f)is similar in extent to the region labeled in immersion-fixed and conventionally-processed paraffin sections. From this we conclude that epitope loss is not the explanation for the absence of immunolabeling in paraffin sections because extracted sections label, and we conclude that crystallin blocking accounts for the disparity.
Collectively, the data in
Figure 4show that BFs are present in cells in which the knockout phenotype is manifested and that BFs in this region are critical to the maintenance of the fiber cell and lens phenotype.