Experiments were conducted in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research, and the design of the study was approved by the Animal Care Committee. Because of the increased variation among rabbits in corneal wound healing response after refractive surgery (especially after PRK), both eyes of each animal were included in the study.
8 9 Eighty eyes of 40 pigmented rabbits (of the same sex, weighing 2.5–3.5 kg) were randomly assigned with a flip of a coin to undergo PRK with a 193-nm conventional EL system (Allegretto 400 Hz WaveLight Excimer Laser; WaveLight, Inc.; fluence 180 mJ/cm
2 per pulse at 10 Hz) in one eye and with a 213-nm wavelength SSL system (Pulzar Z1 Laser System; CustomVis; fluence 180 mJ/cm
2 per pulse at 10 Hz) in the fellow eye.
Animals were anesthetized by intramuscular injection (mixture of xylazine hydrochloride [5 mg/kg] and ketamine hydrochloride [50 mg/kg]) and draped; an eyelid speculum was used to hold the lids open, and 2 drops of local anesthesia were given. After 2 minutes, mechanical epithelium debridement of the central 7.5 mm of the cornea (previously marked with a 7.5-mm trephine) was performed. Both lasers were programmed for 6 diopters (D) at 5 mm optical zone (0.5-mm transitional zone), and approximately 50 μm stromal tissue was removed. The ablation area was adjusted to be the same in both eyes. Mean central corneal thickness was measured with an ultrasound pachymeter (Corneo-Gage Plus; Sonogage Inc., Cleveland, OH) before and after epithelium debridement (362.6 μm [range, 320–455 μm] and 330.4 μm [range, 287–430 μm[, respectively). In all eyes, ophthalmic ointment dexamethasone 0.1%/tobramycin 0.3% (Tobradex; Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) was applied 4 times per day until complete reepithelialization.
Each animal was killed immediately after ablation (group 1,
n = 10), at 7 days (group 2,
n = 10), or at 1 month (group 3,
n = 8), 3 months (group 4,
n = 6), or 12 months (group 5,
n = 6) after the experiment by an intravenous overdose of pentobarbital. Eyes were enucleated and placed in glutaraldehyde 2.5% in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) at 4°C for at least 24 hours and then were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.3) at 4°C for 1 hour. After dehydration and embedding in epoxy resin, corneal samples were sectioned, stained, and examined using light microscopy. In the areas with mostly pronounced morphologic alterations, electron microscopy was performed. Standard techniques for the preparation of scanning and transmission electron microscopy examination were used. All semithin sections were stained with modified trichrome stain
10 ; all sections for electron microscopy were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate.