The ciliary muscle is unique among all parasympathetically dominated smooth muscles in the body because it has many of the ultrastructural, histochemical, and efferent innervational characteristics of a fast striated muscle. Indeed, accommodation requires excellent central visual resolution, rapid distance/near adjustment of focus, and strong tracking and image stabilization. Even maintaining focus on an object at a fixed distance requires constant fine adjustment of crystalline lens shape and position, mediated by the tension of the zonular apparatus, which is, in turn, dependent on the position of the zonular plexus within the valleys of the ciliary body. Therefore, the structures involved in the accommodative mechanism, and perhaps the muscle itself, would be expected to have some sort of afferent mechanism to monitor the state of the muscle's contraction/relaxation and thus the position of the zonular plexus.
Our results showed that there are, in fact, several structures within the ciliary body that could serve such functions. Most of these structures stained for calretinin.
The calcium-binding protein calretinin is a member of the EF-hand homolog family of calcium-binding proteins.
36–38 Calretinin immunoreactivity has been documented in peripheral sensory neurons and in axons innervating muscle spindles, Pacini corpuscles, and Ruffini-like endings. It has, therefore, been suggested that calretinin-expressing neurons innervate particular mechanoreceptors.
16,30–33,39 Such mechanoreceptor-like structures staining for calretinin are present in the posterior part of the ciliary muscle, especially in the transition zone between longitudinal and reticular muscle tips and their elastic tendons. These posterior tendons of the ciliary muscle insert into the elastic fiber network of the choroid and the anterior extension of Bruch's membrane. During accommodation, the posterior end of the ciliary muscle moves anteriorly, stretching the elastic tendons. During disaccommodation, the relaxed muscle is pulled backward again by the elastic force of the tendons.
40,41
The posterior muscle tips and their elastic tendons exhibit calretinin-IR terminals that, based on their location and morphology, suggest a robust mechanism for monitoring stretch, whereby the afferent arm is mediated via axons providing input presumably mainly to the trigeminal ganglion and eventually modulating the efferent response via the parasympathetic oculomotor pathway to the ciliary ganglion. This would be extremely important in regulating the accommodation/disaccommodation process and even during maintenance of sharp focus when fixing on a stable object. In addition, it is known that strong miotics can cause occasional retinal breaks and detachments (for reviews see Refs.
42–
45). Controlled contraction could achieve and maintain the appropriate lens configuration without abruptly stretching the retina. Based on our morphologic studies, however, it cannot be ruled out that the terminals also serve other functions.
In contrast to the posterior elastic tendons, nearly no stained fibers were seen at the anterior elastic-like tendons of the ciliary muscle tips inserting into the trabecular meshwork and scleral spur. However, within the muscle tip itself, large afferent endings were seen, similar to those previously described in the area of the scleral spur.
12 These endings contained no calretinin-IR but stained for neurofilament markers and synaptophysin and ultrastructurally contained numerous and densely packed mitochondria, neurofilaments, and membrane-bound vesicles typical for mechanoreceptors (e.g., also in baroreceptors).
46–48 The anterior longitudinal muscle serves different functions than the posterior portion. This part has to provide stiffening of the tips before the inner portion of the ciliary muscle can move forward-inward. This stiffening is possible because the anterior elastic tendons contain little elastin, in contrast to the posterior ones; rather, they are surrounded by a cross-linked fibrillar sheath increasing in thickness with age (for review see Ref.
49). It is assumed that afferent endings in the anterior muscle portion, with its mainly isometric contraction, face shear stress within the connective tissue surrounding the muscle fibers. It is well documented that the connective tissue spaces at the muscle tips decrease in size during ciliary muscle contraction.
50
The inner portion of the ciliary muscle morphologically differs significantly from the longitudinal portion. Earlier histochemical studies of the primate ciliary muscle
3 showed similarities of the longitudinal part to fast type II skeletal muscle, whereas the inner portions had staining characteristics of slow tonic type I fibers. Ultrastructurally, the circular muscle cells contain significantly more mitochondria than the longitudinal ones. Moreover, they do not form tendinous insertion into the overlying connective tissue of the ground plate. During contraction, the circular portion increases in size
50 and forms an anterior inner edge important for configurational changes of the lens. Visualization of the accommodating ciliary body in monkeys after surgical iridectomy and midbrain implantation of a stimulating electrode
51–53 has confirmed the large amplitude of this forward and inward movement, especially in young animals. It is here in the connective tissue of the ground plate, covering the inner circular muscle portion and separating it from the anterior-most ciliary processes and within this circular muscle portion, that the most numerous and most complex afferent structures are present. Location of the terminals indicates that here, movement of connective tissue fibers by muscle movement and thickening of the muscle fibers themselves can be registered.
Another striking finding, especially in this region, was the presence of a complex intrinsic nerve cell system. These calretinin-IR nerve cells labeled with other neuronal markers and, therefore, representing ganglion cells contacted the muscle cells via their dendrites. It is tempting to speculate that these neurons monitor the state of contraction of the muscle cells directly. Some of the neurons within the calretinin network of the ground plate and within the ciliary muscle show ultrastructural features (e.g., direct connections to the surrounding connective tissue fibers) that suggest direct mechanoreceptive functions as assumed for intrinsic calretinin-positive neurons of the choroid.
34 Thus, the calretinin-IR nerve cells and terminals could measure shape changes of the inner circular muscle portion and, therefore, the state of contraction indirectly. Within the inner portions of the ciliary muscle, Tamm et al.
11 have also described the presence of nitrergic neurons. Our results show that these neurons are surrounded by calretinin-IR synaptic contacts that at least partly derive from the calretinin-IR ganglia in this region.
Afferent stimuli do, however, derive not only from the ciliary muscle tendons and its inner portion but also from the ciliary epithelium because Ruffini-like terminals were found directly adjacent to or in the vicinity of the epithelium at the base of the processes of the anterior pars plicata. Here, in the valleys between the ciliary processes, the overlying epithelium is the anchorage of the zonular plexus.
54
It is tempting to speculate that receptor end organs in these locations are necessary for the registration of pull or traction forces that might occur during the process of fine adjustment of the lens during accommodation and disaccommodation.
This entire nervous system at the inner/apical region of the ciliary muscle suggests the existence of an internal loop regulating fine and rapid microcontraction/relaxation of the region closest and most immediately consequential to the zonular plexus and the lens. We hypothesize that the calretinin-IR nerves and boutons monitor stretch in the ground plate and muscle and transmit information to the NO neurons, whose activation relaxes the muscle and thus dampens and smooths the accommodative and disaccommodative fine control of focus, both when changing the focal distance and when maintaining a fixed focus on a static object (
Fig. 5).
Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants DFG Dr 124/71 and SFB 539 Glaukome, and National Institutes of Health Grant EYO 2698.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must, therefore, be marked “
advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The authors thank the cornea bank of Amsterdam and Hans Bloemendal (Department of Biochemistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands) for the intense endeavors in providing, fixation, and sending of human eyes, and they thank Hong Nguyen, Gerti Link, Elke Kretzschmar, Jörg Pekarsky, and Marco Gösswein for expert technical assistance.