As part of our ongoing effort to map and clone new loci for adult onset FCD, we identified a large, three-generation family, MO, through a proband examined at The Wilmer Eye Institute (
Fig. 1; individual 21). On the conclusion of interviews and review of medical records, we were able to recruit and examine through slit lamp biomicroscopy a total of 17 individuals. Of these, we found 10 (eight female, two male) to fulfill the phenotypic criteria for an FCD diagnosis (12 or more central guttae in one or in both eyes of individuals above 60 years of age). The initial slit lamp examination of individual 22 detected central corneal guttae, although their number did not meet the minimum criteria for Krachmer grade 1. Hence, for the purpose of initial linkage analyses, this person was designated as unaffected. In addition, given that the father of individual 10 was found positive for FCD, we cannot rule out the possibility of her inheriting the pathogenic mutation paternally; hence, alleles of individuals 10 and 11 were not used in linkage and haplotype analyses. Last, even though the older members of family MO were certain that deceased individuals 1, 3, and 8 were positive for FCD, there were no medical records available to confirm the disease; hence, we designated the status of these individuals as unknown.
We first asked whether this family may be linked to any of the known FCD loci. Therefore, we genotyped all available individuals with STR microsatellite markers that span the critical intervals of early- and late-onset FCD loci. Both haplotype analyses and two-point LOD scores excluded family MO from FCD1, FCD2, and the COL8A2 locus (data not shown). We therefore initiated a genome-wide scan by genotyping all appropriate family members by using an SNP microarray (5.0 platform; Affymetrix) that contains 500K SNPs spaced across the whole genome. Of the SNPs, 96% passed the initial QC and were investigated for parentage inconsistencies. A further 4560 SNPs were excluded due to non-Mendelian transmission likely attributed to bad genotyping calls, leaving us with ∼475 K SNPs. As linkage analysis (two-point or multipoint) of the entire SNP set requires exceptional computational power, we decided to simplify our dataset while maintaining uniform coverage across the genome. Hence, we selected every fifth consecutive SNP, and performed two-point linkage on ∼95 K SNPs.
As SNPs are bi-allelic, a family consisting of 17 members would not have enough power to attain significant linkage (LOD > 3); hence, we investigated further all regions with suggestive linkage (LOD > 2). From the genome-wide scan, we observed suggestive linkage only with SNPs located on the long arm of chromosome 5. The highest LOD scores were obtained with rs13173656, rs9313417, rs2116736, rs17451810, rs4958561, and rs778816, yielding scores of 2.71, 2.68, 2.66, 2.70, 2.64, and 2.68, respectively. Reconstruction of a candidate disease haplotype localized the putative critical interval to 27 Mb on 5q.
To determine whether this signal was truly indicative of a new FCD locus, we genotyped the region for all members of family MO with a series of 12 evenly spaced STR microsatellite markers. We observed LOD scores of 2.23, 3.35, 2.82, and 3.37 at θ = 0, with markers
D5S209,
D5S2093,
D5S671, and
D5S425, respectively (
Table 1). Reconstruction of the disease haplotype was consistent with the SNP data and confirmed the linkage results further, indicating that we mapped a new locus for this disorder,
FCD3. There was proximal recombination in affected individual 13 at
D4S434, affected individual 14 at
D5S470 and affected individual 10 at
D5S397 (
Fig. 1). Similarly, there was a distal recombination in affected individual 26 and unaffected individual 15 at
D5S2108 and unaffected individual 20 at
D5S2034 (
Fig. 1). Taken together, these data place the disease locus on 5q33.1–35.2, in a 27-Mb (29-cM) region flanked by
D5S470 proximally and
D5S2108 distally.
Interestingly, individual 22, scored as unaffected based on our initial inclusion and exclusion criteria, harbored the disease allele (
Fig. 1), which prompted us to re-examine this person after a 2-year interval. Slit lamp examination revealed that individual 22 should be designated as clinically affected, with a Krachmer grading score of 1.5 bilaterally (
Fig. 2). Because of this finding, we recalculated LOD scores both for the genome-wide set of 95 K SNPs and for the STR microsatellite markers, with individual 22 marked as affected. Not surprisingly, the two-point LOD scores improved marginally; suggestive LOD scores were only obtained with SNPs located on 5q. Similarly, LOD scores of 2.29, 3.39, 2.88, and 3.41 at θ = 0, were obtained with markers
D5S209,
D5S2093,
D5S671, and
D5S425 respectively (
Table 1).
We were surprised at the low Krachmer score of individual 22, since he is 73 years old. Typically, older individuals of families linked to
FCD1 and
FCD2 loci have a comparatively severe phenotype with a Krachmer grading of 3 or higher.
14 Hence, we wondered whether there are general differences in the phenotype of the
FCD3-defining family compared with the families linked to the other two
FCD loci. We therefore calculated the mean age of affected individuals at each level of FCD severity and compared it with families linked to
FCD1 and
FCD2. The mean age of affected individuals in this family was significantly higher at Krachmer grades 1 and 2, relative to affected individuals in families linked to
FCD1 and
FCD2 (
Fig. 3). Moreover, the average severity of affected individuals above the age of 60 was significantly less in
FCD3-correlated eyes than in those associated with
FCD1 (
P < 0.0001) and
FCD2 (
P < 0.001). Among the 11 affected members of this family, two have a history of inflammatory ocular disease, in addition to FCD. Individual 21 had recurrent bilateral birdshot choroidopathy with a chronic anterior uveitis; 24 had a history of recurrent nodular scleritis and underwent argon laser trabeculoplasty for elevated intraocular pressures. As chronic anterior segment inflammation may distort the FCD phenotype, individuals 21 and 24 were not included in the severity analysis.