Muscle spindles and GTOs are classic proprioceptors, whereas the function of palisade endings is unclear, whether these structures are sensory (proprioceptive),
1,3,7,11,28,29,32–34 motor,
4,8,9,30 or both.
10 Among mammals, sheep is the only species in which these three nerve end organs are observed in common in EOMs.
5,17,20,26 Therefore, we consider sheep to be an ideal species in which to analyze and compare the structural and molecular characteristics of classic and putative proprioceptors (palisade endings). The structure of muscle spindles, GTOs, and palisade endings in sheep EOMs was thoroughly described in previous studies.
5,17,20,26 We reanalyzed morphologic features to complement our new data on molecular characteristics of muscle spindles, GTOs, and palisade endings in the EOMs of this species
Our morphologic findings on muscle spindles, GTOs, and palisade endings in sheep EOMs are in accordance with prior studies.
5,17,20,26 Structural differences became apparent when classic proprioceptors and palisade endings were compared directly. These differences concern cellular components of capsules that ensheathed the organs and vesicle contents of sensory nerve terminals in muscle spindles and GTOs, as well as nerve terminals in palisade endings. Specifically, muscle spindles and GTOs comprised a capsule of perineural cells that were enclosed by a basal lamina. In contrast, palisade endings had a connective tissue capsule composed of fibrocytes that lacked a basal lamina. Sensory nerve terminals contacting intrafusal muscle fibers in muscle spindles' equatorial region and collagen fibrils in GTOs contained mitochondria but only a few if any vesicles. Sensory nerve terminals on intrafusal muscle fibers lacked the basal lamina in the synaptic cleft that is typical in muscle spindles of skeletal muscle including EOMs.
17,18,22,25 In each palisade ending, nerve terminals contacting the tendon were observed. In a few palisade endings, we also found nerve terminals contacting the muscle fiber surface and without a basal lamina in the synaptic cleft. Neurotendinous contacts and neuromuscular contacts (when present) in palisade endings contained mitochondria and were always full of clear vesicles. Aggregations of clear vesicles were also found in motor terminals on intrafusal muscle fibers in the muscle spindles' polar regions and in motor terminals on extrafusal muscle fibers.
By immunohistochemistry we determined the molecular characteristics of muscle spindles, GTOs, and palisade endings. With different combinations of triple labeling we distinguish between noncholinergic and cholinergic nerve fibers and terminals. We have used α-bungarotoxin and antibody against synaptophysin to identify sensory and motor terminals in muscle spindles and GTOs. It is not sensible to apply this staining for palisade endings because to identify palisade endings, it is crucial to label the nerve fibers.
The sensory nerve fibers in the muscle spindles' equatorial region and GTOs were neurofilament-positive but ChAT-negative. Anulospiral endings in muscle spindles' equator and nerve terminals in GTOs were synaptophysin-positive but ChAT and α-bungarotoxin-negative. Muscle spindles receive motor nerve fibers as an additional set of nerve fibers in their polar regions. These nerve fibers stained positive for ChAT and their nerve terminals positive for ChAT and α-bungarotoxin. In line with our previous findings in cat
8,14 and monkey,
4,9 we showed in sheep that palisade endings have a cholinergic phenotype. Specifically, palisade endings in sheep EOMs are supplied by ChAT/neurofilament-positive nerve fibers. The palisade complexes were ChAT/neurofilament immunoreactive as well and in all palisade nerve terminals ChAT and synaptophysin were co-localized.
Summing up, in the present study classic proprioceptors and palisade endings clearly differed with respect to structural and molecular characteristics. We will now discuss the differences with respect to function.
The presence of a perineural capsule and a large subcapsular gap is a typical feature of muscle spindles and GTOs both in mammalian EOMs and other skeletal muscles.
16,24,35–38 Typically, in skeletal muscle, including EOMs, the capsular space of muscle spindles and GTOs is filled with perineural liquid containing acidic mucopolysaccharides.
16,24,35 It is supposed that this viscous liquid has a damping function and protects the sensory nerve terminals in muscle spindles and GTOs from aberrant activation by mechanical interference coming from outside the organs.
22,26,35 Palisade endings in mammals, including humans, have a connective tissue capsule without a subcapsular space.
4,5,8,10,11,29 Furthermore, in palisade endings of humans, Lukas et al.
10 did not find acidic mucopolysaccharides inside the capsule, indicating that perineural liquid was lacking. Why sensory nerve terminals in classic proprioceptors of skeletal muscle including mammalian EOMs are surrounded by perineural liquid and nerve terminals in palisade endings are not is therefore a critical question. At least, the absence of perineural liquid indicates that nerve terminals in palisade endings are less protected against mechanical stimuli.
Clear vesicles are organelles that are commonly observed in sensory nerve terminals of muscle spindles and GTOs and likewise in nerve terminals of palisade endings.
4,5,8,11,18,25,29,39 However, with the exception of developing muscle spindles and GTOs, the number of such vesicles is always very low in sensory nerve terminals of classic proprioceptors.
17,20,22,25,37–40 Only in palisade nerve terminals is a high amount of clear vesicles usually present.
4,5,8–11,29 The presence of vesicles in palisade endings could indicate that maturation of palisade endings is delayed and that these organs mature at a later time. In sheep (this study) and cats
8 animals of different age (between 6 months and 2 years in sheep and between 1 and 16 years in cats) were analyzed. No differences in palisade endings were detected in young and older animals. It is therefore extremely unlikely that clear vesicles in palisade nerve terminals are a sign of ongoing maturation.
By immunohistochemistry we determined the molecular features of clear vesicles. The results showed that vesicles in sensory nerve terminals of muscle spindles and GTOs and palisade nerve terminals differed from each other. In particular, vesicles in sensory nerve terminals of classic proprioceptors were noncholinergic. Vesicles in palisade nerve terminals of sheep were cholinergic, which is in line with our prior findings in palisade endings in cats
8,14 and monkeys.
4,9 Cholinergic vesicles are also found in motor terminals on intrafusal muscle fibers and extrafusal muscle fibers in sheep EOMs and cholinergic vesicles are a general feature of all kind of motor terminals including en plaque and en qrappe motor terminals.
4,41 ChAT is the synthesizing enzyme for the acetylcholine which is the neurotransmitter usually found in motor terminals. The present study confirmed in another animal species that palisade endings contain acetylcholine and further showed that perceptive synapses in classic proprioceptors almost certainly do not contain acetylcholine. In fact this difference between classic proprioceptors and palisade endings complements our recent molecular findings on palisade endings
4,8,9,14 and support the assumption that palisade endings are effectors and most likely not sensory structures.
Clear evidence that palisade endings are effectors came from α-bungarotoxin labeling and a nerve degeneration experiment.
4,8,10,30 In cats,
8 monkeys,
4 and humans
10 neuromuscular contacts when present in palisade endings are endowed with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as demonstrated by staining with α-bungarotoxin. In monkeys, it has also been detected in some cases that nerve fibers supplying palisade endings establish motor contacts outside the palisade complex, which was confirmed by α-bungarotoxin binding.
4 Further, in a nerve degeneration experiment Sas and Scháb
30 found that the perikarya of nerve fibers forming palisade endings lie in the EOM motor nuclei. Specifically, lesions of the EOM motor nuclei cause degeneration of motor terminals and additional loss of palisade endings in the EOMs.
30 Nevertheless, there are also arguments in favor of a sensory role of palisade endings. With the exception of rabbits
6 and rats,
7 palisade endings in all other species (sheep,
5 cats,
8,29 monkeys,
4,11 and humans
10 ) have nerve terminals contacting the tendon. Analogous to GTOs, it is legitimate to ague that such neurotendinous contacts are sensory despite their cholinergic phenotype. The strongest argument that palisade endings are sensory comes from a single neuronal tracing experiment. By injecting neuronal tracer into the sensory trigeminal ganglion of cats Billig et al.
3 found labeled nerve endings in the EOMs, one of which resembled palisade endings.
Since there are arguments for a motor as well as a sensory role for palisade endings, could it be that this EOM-specific structures receive a double innervation from motor and sensory nerve fibers? The answer to this question is no. Specifically, in cats,
8 monkeys,
9 and now in sheep, labeling of nerve fibers with a general marker for neurons (anti-neurofilament) and with a marker for cholinergic nerve fibers (anti-ChAT) has shown that all nerve fibers supplying palisade endings exhibit neurofilament/ChAT-immunoreactivity. Likewise, labeling nerve terminals with a general marker for nerve terminals (anti-synaptophysin) and anti-ChAT demonstrates that all palisade nerve terminals co-localize synaptophysin and ChAT.
8,9