ERG responses were recorded to compare retinal function between
fat-1, WT n-6, and WT chow. Shown in
Figures 2a 2b 2care representative ERG traces recorded in
fat-1 and WT n-6 fed mice. Mixed scotopic response
(Fig. 2a) , photopic response
(Fig. 2b) , and photopic flicker
(Fig. 2c)in the
fat-1 mice had unusually higher amplitudes in comparison to those in the WT n-6 mice. In addition, WT chow mice had even lower ERG response amplitudes
(Figs. 2d 2e 2f 2g) . All three types of ERG intensity response curves and the flicker frequency response curves showed clear differences between the three experimental groups. Thresholds were lower for both mixed scotopic (a- and b-waves) and photopic (b-waves) responses in
fat-1 mice compared with WT n-6 mice and WT chow mice.
Fat-1 mice had higher amplitudes for scotopic a- and b- wave, photopic b-wave, and flicker amplitude, and fusion, followed by WT n-6 mice and WT chow mice. The amplitudes of pure scotopic rod b-waves (elicited by −2.0 log cd · s/m
2, the intensity just below the one eliciting a-waves) were elevated (
P < 0.05) in
fat-1 mice compared with WT n-6 mice (133% ± 30%) and WT chow mice (175% ± 42%). The amplitudes of saturated mixed scotopic a-waves were increased (
P < 0.05) in
fat-1 mice compared with WT n-6 mice (145% ± 28%) and WT chow mice (224% ± 45%;
Fig. 2h ). Similar amplitude elevations (
P < 0.05) were seen for the saturated mixed scotopic b-wave: 136% ± 28% and 209% ± 42% in
fat-1 mice compared with WT n-6 mice and WT chow mice, respectively
(Fig. 2h) . The total amplitude of all oscillatory potentials (isolated with 60–300 Hz band-pass), for the saturated mixed scotopic responses, was higher in
fat-1 mice than in WT chow mice (188% ± 13%;
P < 0.05) but not higher than in WT n-6 mice (111% ± 11%;
Fig. 2h ). Saturated photopic b-waves were increased by 160% ± 36% and 245% ± 79% in
fat-1 mice compared with WT n-6 mice (
P < 0.05) and WT chow mice (
P < 0.05), respectively
(Fig. 2h) . The total amplitude of the oscillatory potentials, for the saturated photopic responses, was higher (
P < 0.05) in
fat-1 mice than in both WT n-6 mice (159% ± 20%) and WT chow mice (243% ± 58%). The flicker amplitude at 20 Hz was higher (
P < 0.05) in
fat-1 mice than in WT n-6 mice (133% ± 17%) and WT chow mice (316% ± 68%). The flicker fusion was also higher in
fat-1 mice than in WT chow mice (
P < 0.05); however, it was not different from WT n-6 mice.