For the toxicity study, eight New Zealand Red rabbits were used, four for the 2-week observation and the other four for the 8-week observation. Rabbits received 25 μg (0.0387 micromoles) or 125 μg (0.19 micromoles) of HDP-P-AraG in their right eyes and the same volume (50 μL) of 5% dextrose in the left eyes as the control. After the intravitreal injection, the eyes were monitored by slit lamp, indirect ophthalmoscopy, and ERG.
1 Intraocular AraG safety was tested in rat eyes. Four Brown Norway rats received 3 μg AraG in 3 μL of 5% dextrose in their right eyes and the fellow eyes received an equal volume of 5% dextrose as the control. The IC
50 of AraG on a human T-cell line was reported to be 284 μM,
22 which translates into the AraG concentration of 0.08 μg/μL. If we assume 30 μL of rat vitreous volume,
23,24 the safe or maximum tolerated dose would be approximately 3 μg/eye. After the intravitreal injection, the eyes were monitored for 2 weeks with indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. ERG was obtained before the animal kill and histology was evaluated using light microscopy. For rat ERGs, the rats were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine (50 mg/kg) and xylazine (5.5 mg/kg). Responses were obtained from the anesthetized cornea (proparacaine HCl, 0.5%) using a gold loop corneal electrode and reference subdermal electrode at the cheek and ground clip electrode on the ear. Responses were collected and amplified as described for the rabbit ERG procedure.
1 At the end of the scheduled observation time points, the animals were killed, and enucleated globes were processed for routine paraffin sections for histology.
For the prophylactic treatment of laser-induced rat CNV, 26 Brown Norway rats were used, 13 for HDP-P-AraG and 13 for AraG. Three days before laser photocoagulation of the retina, 3 μg of 3 μL of HDP-P-AraG suspension or 3 μg of 3 μL of AraG was injected into the right vitreous cavity of each group of 13 rats through the sclera at 1 mm behind the limbus with a sterilized 50-μL syringe on a repeating dispenser (Hamilton, Reno, NV). On a molar basis, the dose of AraG is 2.3-fold higher than the dose of HDP-P-AraG. The drug was injected into the vitreous cavity through a 27-gauge butterfly needle. Three microliters of 5% dextrose was injected into the left vitreous cavity in the same manner as the control. Three days after the injection, the retinas in both eyes were photocoagulated with an 810-nm diode laser. The parameters were a spot size of 75 μm, power of 250 to 300 mW, and exposure time of 100 mS. Five to seven spots were placed around the optic nerve head, 2 to 3 disc diameters away from the optic nerve. Only laser burns that resulted in air bubble formation at the initial application were considered effective burns, and a map of laser burns from each eye was documented by direct viewing through a slit-lamp with a rat cornea contact lens (rat ocular fundus lens, OFA5.4; Ocular Instruments, Inc., Bellevue, WA). In addition, color fundus photographs were obtained from all eyes with a fundus camera (Canon USA, Lake Success, NY).
Two weeks after the laser photocoagulation, fluorescein angiography (FA) was performed on both eyes of each rat. For FA, 0.1 mL of a 24 mg fluorescein sodium/mL solution was injected via sublingual vein. Serial fundus images were acquired in the early, middle, and late phases of FA with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRA; Heidelberg Engineering, Vista, CA). Leakage of the laser burns was determined along with the color fundus photos by reviewing the serial HRA FA frames and identifying the hyperfluorescence increase over time. The leakage was graded by two ophthalmologists in a masked manner as 0 (no leaking), 1 (minimal intensity increase), 2 (moderate intensity increase), and 3 (both intensity and area increase). The average grade of each lesion of the treated eyes from two observers was used to compare the average grade of laser lesions in the fellow eyes using generalized estimating equations (GEEs) for multinomial models (SAS 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). All procedures were performed in animals under general anesthesia with intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (56 mg/kg) and xylazine (6 mg/kg). Topical anesthesia with proparacaine-HCl 1% was also used.