We previously demonstrated the inhibitory effect of TGFBIp on the attachment of HSFs in a solid-phase cell adhesion assay.
44 The present study demonstrates that TGFBIp mediates decreased HSF attachment to collagen type I in a fluid-phase assay. Previous studies have shown TGFBIp supports cell adhesion in many cell types, including corneal fibroblasts,
65 66 67 foreskin fibroblasts,
62 bladder fibroblasts,
68 U87 astrocytoma cells,
69 skeletal muscle cells,
70 proximal tubular epithelial cells,
71 osteoblasts,
53 keratinocytes,
72 SMMC-7721 hepatoma cells,
73 and peritoneal mesothelial cells.
74 Conversely, it has been reported to inhibit cell adhesion in human neuroblastoma cells,
75 A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells, HeLa cells, and WI-38 cells.
46 In the present study, we determined that rTGFBIp inhibited the attachment of HSFs to collagen (−32%;
P < 0.01), and this effect was restored after neutralizing rTGFBIp with equimolar amounts of anti-TGFBIp compared with BSA (+9%;
P = 0.29;
Fig. 2B ). Additionally, the short incubation period (45 minutes) allotted for cell attachment suggested that the anti-adhesive effect of rTGFBIp on HSFs was not a result of decreased cell proliferation. In agreement with previous reports, we observed that rTGFBIp did not inhibit attachment to collagen type I using HFFs (−4%;
P = 0.50;
Fig. 2C ) or HCFs (+37%;
P = 0.24;
Fig. 2D ), compared with BSA. However, a significant decrease in attachment to collagen type I was observed in HFFs treated with antibody-neutralized rTGFBIp compared with cells treated with BSA alone (−28%;
P < 0.01). Because the attachment of HFFs to collagen type I was not affected by treatment with anti-TGFBIp alone, we speculate that the TGFBIp antibody/antigen complexes generated in vitro must have been anti-adhesive to HFFs in our attachment assays. Nevertheless, the finding that TGFBIp inhibits the attachment of HSFs, but not HFFs or HCFs, to collagen type I suggests multiple functional roles of TGFBIp among different cell and tissue types. It also suggests that the anti-adhesive effect of TGFBIp may be fairly specific for HSFs. In contrast to TFGBIp, FN enhanced the attachment of HSFs to collagen type I. We speculate that FN may attach to HSFs through the αvβ5 integrin receptor because FN has been demonstrated to bind to a variety of cell types by this receptor,
76 77 78 and we have demonstrated this integrin on the HSF cell surface. Give that rTGFBIp was shown to bind to HSFs by both αvβ3 and αvβ5, it is likely that rTGFBIp may block the adhesion of HSFs to FN as well; however, these experiments were not conducted in the present study.