IVCM was performed with the patient's eye under topical anesthesia with oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4% (minims; Chauvin Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kingston-upon-Thames, UK). A digital camera mounted on a side arm furnished a lateral view of the eye and objective lens, to monitor the position of the objective lens on the surface of the eye. A drop of 0.2% polyacrylic gel (Viscotears Liquid Gel; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Camberley, UK) served as a coupling medium between the PMMA contact cap and the objective of the HRTII-RCM. Sequential en face images through the entire corneal thickness were obtained from automated scans and manual frame acquisition, for each examined eye. Oblique images and volume scans as described above were also obtained. For qualitative analysis of pathologic findings, 6 to 10 images for each layer were analyzed to avoid inclusion of artifacts or chance findings. For quantitative analysis of cell density, an average of three images for each cornea, excluding duplicates, was analyzed through a built-in feature of the Eye Explorer (ver. 1.5.10.0) to perform the cell-density count in a semiautomated manner. ImageJ (ver. 1.31; Wayne Rasband, Research Services Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD;
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html) is an open-source image-processing program that was used in the analysis of the IVCM images, with provision of reference scale bars. For subbasal nerve density, the NeuronJ plug-in, developed by Meijering et al.,
5 was used with ImageJ to facilitate the tracing and length measurement of subbasal corneal nerves in IVCM images semimanually. An average of three to five images was chosen in each case. Details of the method are given in our previous publication.
6 Thirteen corneal samples obtained by PK were processed for light microscopy. They were embedded in resin or wax blocks to obtain cross sections of 5 μm for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and 1 μm for toluidine blue staining. Three representative samples were further examined by electron microscopy (EM; cases 2, 16, and 17;
Table 1). For light microscopy, they were examined with a digital scanner (Nanozoomer Digital Pathology scanner; NDP C9600 series; Hamamatsu Photoincs KK, Hamamatsu City, Japan), using its viewer software for high-magnification views and cell morphometry. Calculation of nuclear length was performed using the software of the scanner, as illustrated in
Figure 6. Nuclei of all the subepithelial cells in a given 40× field of the histology sections were measured. Twice as many nuclei of the corresponding corneal stroma were also randomly selected and measured. When two nuclei overlapped or lay very close to each other, they were avoided. The average nuclear size was determined and compared for the two sets of cells. Three patients, three fields each, were thus analyzed.