Three masked observers evaluated the confocal images for central corneal DC density, DC size, number of dendrites per cell, corneal nerve morphology, and analyzed the subbasal nerve plexus as previously described.
6,22 IVCM images at a depth of 50 to 70 μm at the level of basal epithelial layers, basal lamina, or subbasal nerve plexus were chosen for analysis of DCs. It should be noted that due to the “in vivo” nature of the study, the exact identity of these DC cannot specified, as they could be monocytes or tissue macrophages, but most likely dendritic cells. DCs were morphologically identified as bright individual dendritiform structures with cell bodies that allowed us to differentiate these structures from the corneal nerves. Briefly, DCs were counted using software (Cell Count, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH) in the manual mode. The data were expressed as density (cells/mm
2) ± SD. DC size and number of dendrites per DC were analyzed using ImageJ software (developed by Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available at
http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). DC size was measured as the area covered by a single cell. The data were expressed as size (μm
2) ± SD and dendrites per cell ± SD. The nerve analysis was done using the semi-automated tracing program NeuronJ,
23 a plug-in for ImageJ (
http://www.imagescience.org/meijering/software/neuronj/; see
Fig. 3O). Nerve density was assessed by measuring the total length of the nerve fibers in micrometers per frame (160,000 μm
2). Main nerve trunks were defined as the total number of main nerve trunks in one image after analyzing the images anterior and posterior to the analyzed image to confirm that these did not branch from other nerves. Nerve branching was defined as the total number of nerve branches in one image. The number of total nerves measured was defined as the number of all nerves, including main nerve trunks and branches in one image. The grade of nerve tortuosity was classified in four grades according to a tortuosity grading scale reported by Oliveira-Soto and Efron.
24 Statistical analysis was performed by Student's
t-test and ANOVA to compare the different groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to determine significant relationships between DC density, nerve parameters, duration of infection, and patient age. Differences were considered statistically significant for
P values < 0.05. Analyses were performed with statistical analysis software (SAS software version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).