Purchase this article with an account.
Goro Maehara, Benjamin Thompson, Behzad Mansouri, Reza Farivar, Robert F. Hess; The Perceptual Consequences of Interocular Suppression in Amblyopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(12):9011-9017. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-7748.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
It is known that information from an amblyopic eye can be strongly suppressed when both eyes are open. The authors investigated the way in which suppression influences the relative perception of suprathreshold contrast and luminance between a person's eyes under dichoptic viewing conditions.
Stimuli consisted of four patches of luminance or four patches containing gratings. Two patches were presented to each eye. Ten amblyopes with mild suppression (six strabismic, three anisometropic and strabismic, and one deprivation; mean age, 34.5 years) and three control observers with normal vision (mean age, 33.0 years) matched the appearance of the stimuli presented to each eye. The match involved manipulation of either luminance or contrast.
Amblyopes with mild suppression decreased stimulus luminance in the fellow fixing eye or increased luminance in the amblyopic eye to achieve a match (mean matching luminance, 21.1 and 39.6 cd/m2 for the fellow fixing eye and the amblyopic eye, respectively; standard luminance, 30 cd/m2). This interocular mismatch was also observed when luminance was variable and contrast was kept constant (mean matching luminance, 22.8 cd/m2 for the fellow fixing eye). On the other hand, the amblyopic eye showed no loss of perceived contrast. There was little or no mismatch between the two eyes of control participants with normal binocular vision.
Amblyopes have monocular deficits in contrast perception but dichoptic deficits in luminance perception, suggesting that suppression in its mild form involves luminance processing.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only