During the past decade, there have been changing trends in the practice and progress of medicine that have resulted in the emergence of CoNS as a major cause of nosocomial infections.
17 Previous studies on CoNS have shown that apart from S.
epidermidis, a large number of isolates from ocular infections were
S. haemolyticus and
S. hominis.
18,19 Our study also showed similar preponderance of
S. haemolyticus wherein 36% of isolates belonged to this species. In another study, apart from
S. epidermidis, other CoNS species like
S. warneri,
S. capitis,
S. hominis,
S. xylosus,
S. simulans,
S. equorum, and
S. lugdunensis were isolated from ocular infections.
4 The present study also witnessed ocular infections with these species except
S. simulans and
S. equorum. We believe that this increase in ocular infections by non–
S. epidermidis CoNS species may be either real or a result of improvement in diagnosis and identification of species of
Staphylococcus.
Surveillance studies of bacterial resistance are imperative for a better utilization of antimicrobials in any clinical setting as well as to decide on the empiric antimicrobial therapy. Antibiotic susceptibility of CoNS is unpredictable and multidrug resistance including methicillin resistance is more common in CoNS due to indiscriminate use of antibiotics.
4,20 Hence it is prudent to make antibiotic susceptibility testing mandatory in all cases of clinically significant ocular infections caused by CoNS. Forty-one percent of isolates from the disease-causing group of isolates were resistant to three or more antibiotics as well as high methicillin resistance (78%) was noted among the isolates obtained from patients suffering from keratitis in our study. In contrast, methicillin resistance was comparatively lower among the isolates obtained from healthy volunteers. Presence of
mecA gene that mediates methicillin resistance has been earlier proposed as a marker for discriminating between disease-causing and contaminating strains.
12,13 Our results substantiate earlier findings of prevalence of
mecA gene in disease-causing strains.
Previous studies have shown that presence of
ica operon among clinically significant CoNS is vital for their virulence.
12,21 However, contradictory views have also suggested that
ica is not a prerequisite for establishing CoNS infection.
22 A recent study showed no differences in the distribution of the
ica between the clinically significant isolates and non-postoperative bacterial keratitis isolates. Nevertheless, the ability to produce biofilm was found to be present significantly more in disease-causing keratitis isolates than among non-postoperative bacterial keratitis isolates.
7,23 It is also presumed that disease-causing
icaAB-positive strains were selected because of their biofilm-forming capacity at the time of invasive therapy from a population of essentially
icaAB and biofilm-negative commensal strains that are thought to be the prototype of an avirulent CoNS subpopulation.
24 This model is based on many observations of higher prevalence of
icaADBC operon in invasive strains than in commensal strains.
12,13 Concurringly, we also documented more cases of
icaADBC detection (55%) in invasive non–
S. epidermidis CoNS strains causing endophthalmitis than in commensal or keratitis strains. Therefore, it appears that CoNS infections are typically endogenous in character and the populations with invasive characters are recruited and selected from the pool of commensal strains present in the patients, which is responsible for the disease.
Identification results for API and microbial genotyping corresponded only in 48.4% of the isolates. API identified isolates of S. haemolyticus accurately with an identification score greater than 90. Majority of S. haemolyticus isolates were correctly identified by both API and FAFLP and the results were corresponding well. However, API failed to identify other species of CoNS with a good score. API identification of S. warneri, S. hominis, S. captis and S. lugdunensis always accompanied lower API identification scores ranging from 40 to 75. Identification results of API not corresponding with the FAFLP results while identifying certain species, implies that API has misidentified many isolates. Such noncorrespondence of API with FAFLP suggests that the battery of biochemical tests of API were not able to identify or not sufficient to identify all the species of CoNS. Hence, it is better not to consider, or one can say it is not prudent, to rely on API alone particularly when a species is identified by API with a lower score. Promisingly, FAFLP was able to discriminate more isolates by generating a total of 12 clusters when compared with 7 groups identified by API. Therefore, it is possible that with aid of the referral CoNS FAFLP database, one can accurately identify all the species of CoNS. Moreover, FAFLP did not detect major differences between disease-causing isolates and normal commensals implying that these two are not genetically distinct and disease might be sourced endogenously. In addition, disease-wise clustering was not evident using this method with an exception of cluster II. Furthermore, FAFLP genotyping in this study showed a clear heterogeneity among the isolates of single species and revealed that there were no predominant clones in the study population. Microbial genotyping DNA typing appears to be most reliable as a rapid genotypic method, particularly well suited to the epidemiologic study of CoNS isolates.
Supported by Grant No. F. No. 36-190/2008 (SR) from the University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India (KP).