This apparent lack of BMZ and reduced number of hemidesmosomes in the β6
−/− mice after a keratectomy leads us to question, how is the lack of αvβ6 disrupting their reformation? To examine this question, two markers were used. A laminin antibody generated using rat yolk sac tumor laminin as an antigen, which localizes to the BMZ, but does not identify a specific laminin molecule, and α6β4, which localizes within hemidesmosomes at the BMZ (
Fig. 6). As with humans, rats, and chickens,
11,30 –32 an uninterrupted linear pattern of laminin was observed beneath the epithelium in unwounded corneas of WT and β6
−/− mice (
Figs. 6A,
6E). Laminin colocalized with α6β4 in both genotypes before wounding (
Figs. 6A1,
6E1). After keratectomy, the BMZ was removed and therefore, there was no laminin or α6β4 localization within the wound area in either strain of mice (data not shown). In WT mice 4 days post keratectomy, laminin (
Fig. 6B) and α6β4 (
Fig. 6B1) colocalized and appeared just below the epithelium; however, they were not yet continuous, but rather, patchy and thickened. By 1 week, the patchiness of both laminin and α6β4 began to disappear (
Figs. 6C,
6C1). By 4 weeks, both markers continued to colocalize and the thickening was disappearing (data not shown) and by 2 months (
Figs. 6D,
6D1), it was similar to unwounded (
Figs. 6A,
6A1). On the other hand, 4 days after a keratectomy in β6
−/− mice (
Figs. 6F,
6F1), small patches of laminin and α6β4 were present, but the majority of the wound area had little staining. One week post keratectomy (
Figs. 6G,
6G1), there appeared to be more patches of staining. This increase in patchy localization continued at 2 (
Figs. 6H,
6H1) and 4 weeks (data not shown). By 4 months, laminin (
Fig. 6I) and α6β4 (
Fig. 6I1) colocalized where the epithelium and the stroma met; however, in the area where the epithelium did not appear to be adhering to the stroma, laminin was not present.