HD-OCT scans were performed using a Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Sharply focused, uniformly illuminated images obtained at baseline and, where possible, at subsequent visits, included optic disc cube 200 × 200 (×2) where the laser scanned a 6- × 6-mm area, capturing of a cube of data consisting of 200 A-scans from 200 linear B-scans of 2 mm per A-scan (40,000 A-scans) and average thickness for the entire circumference of the RNFL was calculated using software provided with the HD-OCT, and the HD 5 Line Raster scan, consisting of five speckle-reduced B-scans of 9 mm long, each consisting of 1024 A-scans (each with an axial depth of 2 mm and 1024 pixels per A-scan). Only scans centered on the optic disc with a signal strength of six or higher were analyzed.
Axial views were evaluated from the individual B-scan (horizontal image) through the center of each optic disc. The horizontal image was 9 mm long for the five-line raster scan and 6 mm long for the optic disc cube scan. The axial image was used to identify the temporal and nasal RPE/BM borders of the neural canal. The angle formed between a line drawn tangential to the curve of the unaltered RPE/BM in the peripapillary retina furthest from the ONH and the altered border adjacent to the NCO was measured on the nasal and temporal sides of the optic nerve (
Fig. 1). We evaluated the direction of the RPE/BM angle measured with the image centered on the center of the optic disc and for all horizontal images above and below the midline. Because the angle direction was the same for all images at each NCO border in individual eyes, we analyzed on the image positioned in the middle of the optic disc. The angle was measured along the NCO relative to the RPE/BM, increasing further away from the NCO. We realize that a limitation of our study is that given our 9-mm image use, we did not always reach a nondeformed region of the RPE/BM, but the direction of the angle measured and the changes over time were consistent. The expected position of the RPE/BM was based on the fellow eye for nonpapilledema eyes and based on an interpolated line from the observed outer RPE/BM position in eyes with papilledema. We recognized a limitation in current clinically available methodology related to degradation of signal intensity in deeper layers of the nerve by optic disc edema. This can make evaluation of the architecture of the sclera directly underlying the most edematous portion of the nerve difficult.
The relative RPE/BM angulation inward or toward the vitreous was measured as a positive angle and outward was measured as a negative angle. For each eye, the angulation was considered positive if there was 5° or greater inward angulation of unadjusted images (measured with Adobe Photoshop [Adobe, San Jose, CA]) of either the temporal or nasal border of the RPE/BM immediately around the ONH. The angle was considered negative if it was less than or equal to 5° and neutral if it fell between the two. The angle was relative and not absolute because the HD-OCT images used for the determinations are scaled differently for the vertical and horizontal dimensions. For a 9-mm HD 5 Line Raster scan, the horizontal dimension is decreased by a factor of three relative to the vertical dimension, because the aspect ratio presented is 2:3, while the true acquired aspect ratio is 2:9. Although this introduces some error—because the conversion for aspect ratio depends on the proportion of horizontal and vertical components—for angles 20° or smaller, the conversion is nearly linear, and the true angle is approximately one-third of the measured angle. For the cube scans, with a 6-mm horizontal extent, the converted angle will be roughly half of the relative angle. To show this mathematically the conversion is expressed as:
where
Htrue is the true horizontal extent of the right triangle that defines the angle,
Vtrue is the vertical extent,
Hmeas is the horizontal extent of the right triangle that defines the measured angle,
Vmeas is the vertical extent, and f is the ratio of the aspect ratios, equal to 3 for a 9-mm long B-scan and 2 for a 6-mm long B-scan. Solving for the relationship of the measured angle to the true angle gives:
For small angles, this implies that the true angle is proportional to the measured angle, so the sign of the angle will be correct. Therefore, in no case should the direction of the angular deviation be affected by this aspect ratio conversion. Because we used unaltered exported images to derive the angle, we adjusted the angle sizes after measurements were obtained from the unaltered images accordingly and used the term relative angle with respect to the plane of the peripheral peripapillary retina away from the nerve head in reporting angle measurements for the study findings. We determined whether the angle was positive, negative, or at neutral (called zero).
A review of 246 subjects (491 eyes with images that could be evaluated) in the INN Neuro-Ophthalmology Cirrus database, who at the time of imaging had no clinically swollen optic nerves or chronic open angle glaucoma (mean age, 53 years [SD, 17]), revealed only nine eyes in five subjects who met our criteria for having positive RPE/BM angulation. Out of one image for each of 491 eyes, the median relative angle for the temporal and nasal borders was –1.0 (SD, 1.7) and –1.0 (SD, 1.6) degrees, respectively, and six eyes (1%) had an angle of 5°. In the 491 eyes and patients in this study, on the unadjusted images, the RPE/BM temporal and nasal angles on repeat scans at each visit were within 5°, and none were positive on one side and negative on the other, nor positive on one and negative on the repeat scan. In addition, we prospectively performed five-line HD scans horizontally through the middle of the optic disc in the right eye of 30 subjects without optic nerve disease. Without correction for the aspect ratio, for the temporal and nasal neural canal angles the mean was –7.2° (SD, 6.6; range, 0 to –22) and –3.8° (SD, 3.7; range, 0 to –15), respectively. No eyes had a positive angle or inward deflection. We used this information to require on unadjusted images at least 5° change for eyes with more than one examination visit over time to determine that the angle was altered. In addition, because the variability for at least two optic cube images per eye at the same examination was <10 μm (data not shown) and the reproducibility of OCT RNFL measurements (shown in many previous peer reviewed journals) is within 10 μm, we required the average RNFL to differ by >10 μm (increase for thickening and decrease for thinning) between visits to determine that the RNFL was changed.