Purchase this article with an account.
Takeshi Morimoto, Motohiro Kamei, Kentaro Nishida, Hirokazu Sakaguchi, Hiroyuki Kanda, Yasushi Ikuno, Haruhiko Kishima, Tomoyuki Maruo, Kunihiko Konoma, Motoki Ozawa, Kohji Nishida, Takashi Fujikado; Chronic Implantation of Newly Developed Suprachoroidal-Transretinal Stimulation Prosthesis in Dogs. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011;52(9):6785-6792. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6971.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
To investigate the feasibility of implanting a newly developed suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS) prosthesis in dogs and to determine its biocompatibility and stability over a 3-month period.
The STS prosthesis system consisted of an array of 49 electrodes (nine were active), an intravitreal return electrode, and an extraocular microstimulator. The 49-electrode array was implanted into a scleral pocket of each of three healthy beagle dogs. Color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, electroretinography, and functional testing of the STS system were performed postoperatively. The dogs were euthanatized 3 months after the implantation, and the retinas were evaluated histologically.
All the prostheses were successfully implanted without complications, and no serious complications occurred during the 3-month postoperative period. The fixation of the implant was stable throughout the experimental period. Fluorescein angiography showed that the entire retina, including the area on the electrode array, remained well perfused without intraocular inflammation. Electroretinograms recorded from the eyes with the prosthesis did not differ significantly from those recorded from control eyes. Functional testing of the STS system showed that this system performed well for the 3-month experimental period. Histologic evaluations showed good preservation of the retina over the electrode array.
Implantation of a newly developed STS retinal prosthesis into a scleral pocket of beagle dogs is surgically feasible and can be performed without significant damage to the retina or the animal. The biocompatibility and stability of the system were good for the 3-month observation period.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only