Studies of mRNA and protein expression revealed diverse distribution of α
1-AR receptor subtypes among vascular beds.
18,19,31 Some of these studies reported that the mRNA expression levels of individual α
1-AR subtypes were in fairly good agreement with their protein levels or their contribution to adrenergic vasoconstrictor responses.
18,19,31,32 Other studies, however, demonstrated that the presence of mRNA or even protein for a particular α
1-AR subtype does not ensure its participation in vasoconstriction.
33,34 This can be explained either by differences in the efficiency of individual α
1-AR subtypes to accumulate intracellular inositol phosphate and calcium or by a different extent of receptor subtype expression in intracellular compartments, preventing them from interaction with the hydrophilic natural ligands.
34 –36 Although we found mRNA of all three α
1-AR subtypes to be expressed at similar levels in ophthalmic arteries, adrenergic vasoconstriction was predominantly mediated by the α
1A-AR, raising a question about the physiologic role of α
1B- and α
1D-ARs. A growing body of evidence suggests that each receptor subtype can activate independent signaling pathways, resulting in different physiologic functions.
15 For example, the α
1D-AR was shown to mediate generation of reactive oxygen species and induction of apoptosis in human aortic smooth muscle cells.
37,38 Moreover, the α
1B-AR was reported to mediate trophic effects of catecholamines in mouse arteries, whereas the α
1D-AR does not appear to be involved in this process.
39,40 Thus, although our data indicate that α
1B- and α
1D-ARs do not significantly contribute to adrenergic vasoconstricton in murine ophthalmic arteries, both receptor subtypes may be involved in regulation of other physiologic or pathophysiologic actions.