Our subjects were asked to keep their eyes open as long as possible once the experiment was started. The duration of the open eye period varied from one subject to another. Subjects with longer NITFBUTs and ITFBUTs tended to have longer interblink intervals (NITFBUT: R 2 = 0.345, P < 0.001; ITFBUT: R 2 = 0.301, P = 0.001). Every subject was able to maintain an open eye for at least 10 seconds before blinking; therefore we used data from that interval for further analysis.
For each wavefront measurement, 35 terms of Zernike coefficients of up to the seventh order were derived. Only Zernike aberration terms of the second order (Z2 -2, oblique astigmatism; Z2 2, main axis astigmatism), third order (Z3 −1, vertical coma; Z3 1, horizontal coma; Z3 −3 and Z3 3, trefoil), and fourth order (Z4 0, spherical aberration) make the largest contributions to the overall wavefront aberration. Therefore, we determined the results mainly for these aberration terms.
There was a substantial individual variation in the dynamic change of the Zernike aberrations. Dynamic changes occurred in Zernike coefficients of the second order (Z
2 -2 and Z
2 2, the astigmatism terms;
Fig. 1, left panel), third order (Z
3 −3, Z
3 −1, Z
3 1, and Z
3 3, the trefoil and coma terms;
Fig. 1, middle panel), and fourth order (Z
4 0, the spherical aberration term;
Fig. 1, right panel) during the first 10-second postblink period. The data were assigned individual symbols for the different Zernike terms at each second, and the change trend was fitted with a second order polynomial function from the first second of the test. For some subjects, such as SWY and ZA, there were obvious changes in the Zernike terms (
Fig. 1), especially in Z
3 −3, Z
3 −1, and Z
4 0, while other subjects, such as XCB and FJX, showed less variation.
In spite of substantial individual variation in Zernike aberration changes, systematic changes in some of the Zernike terms were observed for the 33 subjects (
Fig. 2). There was a significant change toward a more negative direction in the main axis astigmatism Z
2 2 (
R 2 = 0.933,
P < 0.0001;
Fig. 2, left panel) for this group of subjects while the oblique astigmatism Z
2 −2 was quite stable. The trefoil term Z
3 −3 and vertical coma Z
3 −1 both increased significantly during the 10-second period (Z
3 −3:
R 2 = 0.854,
P = 0.003; Z
3 −1:
R 2 = 0.935,
P < 0.0001;
Fig. 2, middle panel). Meanwhile the trefoil term Z
3 3 and horizontal coma Z
3 1 were quite stable without showing any significant change. Spherical aberration Z
4 0 for this group of subjects increased significantly (
R 2 = 0.879,
P = 0.002;
Fig. 2, right panel). The mean value of Z
2 2 decreased by 0.0262 μm by 10 seconds (
P = 0.022), while the vertical coma Z
3 −1 was significantly increased by 0.0275 μm (
P = 0.019). The mean values of both Z
3 −3 and Z
4 0 at the 10-second point were also different from their corresponding initial values, but the differences were not significant (
P = 0.109 and
P = 0.226, respectively).
For all subjects, the variation of Z4 0 was negatively correlated with NITFBUT and ITFBUT (R 2 = 0.127, P = 0.042; R 2 = 0.147, P = 0.027, respectively). Furthermore, ITFBUT was negatively correlated with changes of Z3 −1 (R 2 = 0.130, P = 0.039).
We divided our subjects into subgroups according to TFBUTs. One group was composed of subjects (
n = 16) with NITFBUT shorter than 15 seconds, and the other group was composed of subjects (
n = 17) with NITFBUT equal to or greater than 15 seconds There were differences in dynamic behavior of the Zernike aberrations of the two subgroups (
Fig. 3). For the group with shorter NITFBUTs (
Fig. 3A), Z
2 2 (
P = 0.024) and Z
3 −1 (
P = 0.009) at 10 seconds were significantly higher than the initial values. In contrast, the aberrations were quite stable for the group with longer NITFBUTs (
Fig. 3B).
Except for Z
2 0, there were also variations of the total root-mean-square (tRMS) of the aberrations from the second to seventh orders during the first 10 seconds (
Fig. 4). For all 33 subjects, the tRMS slightly decreased in the early seconds after blinking and then gradually increased to a level higher than that at the beginning (
P = 0.032;
Fig. 4, left panel). Subjects with shorter NITFBUTs had a significant increase in tRMS during the entire 10-second test period (
P = 0.019;
Fig. 4, middle panel). For subjects with longer NITFBUTs, the tRMS did not increase until the ninth second (
Fig. 4, right panel). The results could imply that the systematic changes in Zernike aberrations for the entire group, as observed in
Figure 2, were mainly contributed from the subjects with relatively shorter NITFBUT.