Speckle noise reduced SD-OCT imaging allowed us to determine the depth of the inner retinal depressions called dimples in earlier studies,
10–13 in eyes that underwent successful macular hole surgery with ILM peeling. The defects were located in the arcuate striae in all eyes with a DONFL appearance. A large proportion (80.6%) of these eyes included the inner retinal depressions that were seen in the SD-OCT images to extend beyond the RNFL into the GCL and IPL. The inner retinal defects, including those deeper than the RNFL, also were found in 62.5% eyes without an evident DONFL appearance. These findings would indicate that comparisons of the visual function between eyes with and without a DONFL appearance will not necessarily show if the DONFL appearance will alter retinal function. Because the mean retinal sensitivity on the arcuate striae was slightly, but significantly lower than that away from the arcuate striae, the inner retinal changes associated with ILM peeling may be more harmful to postoperative retinal sensitivity than believed.
9–14
Earlier studies showed that the DONFL was due to the dissociation (cleavage) of the bundles of the optic nerve fibers in the posterior pole.
9–14 This conclusion was reached because the depressions appeared to be limited to the RNFL in the TD-OCT images, and because the presence of a DONFL appearance was not associated with a significant reduction of the visual acuity or retinal sensitivity. However, the OCT results of earlier studies must be interpreted with caution. First, the resolution of the TD-OCT (Stratus OCT) was not high enough to identify the different retinal layers that were involved in the defects. Abnormalities of the RNFL could be detected in the TD-OCT images, but the images were not clear enough to determine the status of the GCL and IPL.
9–13 Second, because earlier studies showed only vertical scans through the central fovea, we were not able to see the tomographic images in the other regions. In our study, the deep defects were seen most frequently in the temporal macula, and these deeper defects were limited to a focal part of each arcuate striae (
Fig. 2). The slow imaging speed of the TD-OCT would not be effective in detecting such deep focal defects.
The DONFL appearance is believed to be caused by the ILM peeling because a DONFL appearance did not develop in eyes without ILM peeling during macular hole surgery. In addition, the DONFL appearance was present only in the area where the ILM was peeled.
11,12 The toxicity of ICG for ILM staining also may cause the development of a DONFL appearance. However, we could not find any significant differences in the development of a DONFL appearance between eyes exposed to ICG and TA. This result is consistent with the earlier studies,
11,12,14 in which no differences were found in the incidence of the DONFL appearance between eyes with and without the use of ICG, and between ICG-peeled and trypan blue-peeled eyes. In addition, in our study, no significant differences were found in the frequency of the deep inner retinal defects between eyes treated with ICG and TA. Thus, the ILM peeling procedure itself appears to be responsible for the development of the DONFL appearance and the deep inner retinal defects, rather than the dye used for ILM peeling. However, we cannot deny the possibility that the use of the ILM staining, particularly ICG, might have enhanced the retinal changes associated with a DONFL appearance, such as the number of arcuate striae and the depth of the inner retinal defects. Further studies are needed to clarify this possibility.
It is known that the ILM has an important role in retinal physiology, because it is the basal lamina of the endfeet of the Müller cells. Tadayoni et al. suggested that that the DONFL appearance may be caused by permanent damage to the part of the Müller cells that maintains the optic nerve fiber bundles together.
9 Thus, when the Müller cells are damaged, the optic nerve fibers lose their structural support and a dissociation of the optic nerve fiber layer appears. However, the deep inner retinal defects we observed in our study cannot be explained by only the dissociation of retinal nerve fibers.
Damages to the Müller cells also may cause degenerative changes of the retinal nerve fibers, which can, in turn, cause atrophic changes in the GCL and IPL. This is supported by the observation that the b-waves of the focal macular electroretinogram are reduced after macular hole surgery combined with ILM peeling, but not in eyes without ILM peeling.
16 In addition, it required at least 1 month for the DONFL appearance to develop,
12,26 which is in keeping with the time required for biologic changes, such as tissue remodeling, to develop after the macular hole surgery with ILM peeling.
In our study, the inner retinal defects were found more frequently than the DONFL appearance. The rate of DONFL appearance on color or red-free photography after ILM peeling was 66% in our study, and ranged from 54% to 62% in the earlier studies.
10–12 The rate of DONFL appearance was higher in our patients than in those of the earlier studies, but not largely different. In contrast, the rate of DONFL appearance after MH surgery with ILM peeling was 73% and 100% in the 2 earlier studies,
26,27 in which a DONFL appearance was detected by retinal surface or en face SD-OCT imaging in a 3-dimensional cube scan of Cirrus HD-OCT. Importantly, the HD-OCT images showed a DONFL appearance pattern even in eyes without a DONFL appearance in the color fundus photographs, consistent with our observation.
26,27 Photography may be less sensitive in detecting certain inner retinal abnormalities after MH surgery with ILM peeling. The DONFL appearance on photography is seen where the optical reflectance from the RNFL is changed abruptly, whereas the retinal surface or en face imaging on SD-OCT is based on the three-dimensional structures of the retinal surface. This difference in imaging principles appears to be the cause of the disagreement between color fundus photographs and SD-OCT images in some cases.
26,27 If the inner retinal defects do not lead to such sharp changes in the RNFL reflectance, they would not be seen as a DONFL appearance in the fundus photographs. In addition, the DONFL appearance is recognized easily because it shows the characteristic arcuate striae pattern of retinal nerve fibers. If the inner retinal defects do not form the characteristic arcuate striae pattern, it may be more difficult to recognize the defects as a DONFL appearance.
Earlier studies did not find any evidence that the DONFL appearance was associated with a reduction of the visual acuity or the visual sensitivity. However, it is necessary to interpret these functional results of the earlier studies with caution. First, no significant difference in the postoperative BCVA or the improvements of the BCVA improvements between eyes with and without DONFL appearances was reported as we found.
9–13 Ito et al. compared the retinal sensitivities using the Humphrey 10-2 program, and reported no significant difference in the mean deviations between eyes with and without DONFL appearances. In our study, however, the inner retinal defects were found in 87.5% eyes without a DONFL appearance, which generally is consistent with the results of an earlier study.
26 In addition, we found that the inner retinal defects extended deeper than the RNFL in 62.5% of eyes without a DONFL appearance. Thus, it is uncertain whether comparisons of the visual functions between eyes with and without DONFL appearances can validate actual damages to the inner retinal layers associated with a DONFL appearance.
We found a slight, but significant, difference in the sensitivities between the points on and away from the arcuate striae, which is not consistent with the results of earlier studies.
11,13 Mitamura et al. used microperimetry to determine the retinal sensitivities at 4 points in the nasal quadrant, and reported no significant differences in the threshold values between the points on the arcuate striae and those on the surrounding normal appearing retina.
11 Our results showed that the nasal quadrant had the lowest incidence of inner retinal defects deeper than the RNFL, which may explain why Mitamura et al. did not find any significant difference. Imai et al. compared the retinal sensitivities determined by Microperimeter-1 on and away from the arcuate striae, and did not find any significant difference in any of the 10 eyes.
13 As shown in our histogram, a reduction of retinal sensitivity was detected in the points over and also away from the arcuate striae. Ganglion cell bodies are displaced laterally from the cone photoreceptors in the macula by the elongation of the cone axons, which connect to the bipolar cells.
28–30 Thus, it is possible that a stimulus on the tiny area of the inner retinal defects will not detect a reduced sensitivity because the photoreceptors connecting to the ganglion cells in the area with the inner retinal defects are displaced from this area. Such displacements of the retinal ganglion cells may be responsible, at least in part, for not detecting significant differences between measurement points on and away from the arcuate striae.
Ito et al. did not detect a scotoma in eyes with a DONFL appearance by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) microperimetry.
12 In contrast, Haritoglou et al. observed paracentral scotomata by SLO microperimetry in 56.2% patients after macular hole surgery with ILM peeling without ICG.
17 Of these, 27.1% were relative and 72.9% were absolute scotomata. The scotomata were located temporally (74.6%), inferiorly (62.7%), superiorly (50.8%), or nasally (23.7%). The distribution of the scotomata in the 4 quadrants was similar to that of the inner retinal defects deeper than the RNFL in our patients. Although the investigators were not aware of the phenomenon of a DONFL appearance, they mentioned that 57.6% of these scotomata appeared similar to a RNFL defect. It is likely that they unknowingly detected scotomata associated with a DONFL appearance. It is known that the receptive field of a retinal ganglion cell overlaps those of surrounding retinal ganglion cells. Functionally, damage to retinal ganglion cells can be compensated for by the surrounding retinal ganglion cells.
31,32 This compensation can prevent the development of a scotoma when the area of damage is small, and may be responsible for the inconsistency of our results with that of the earlier studies.
Similar gaps between clinical functional testing and local structural damage have been well documented in preperimetric glaucoma. Approximately 50% of retinal ganglion cells have been lost when the visual field defects at the corresponding test point are detectable in the central 10° by standard automated perimetry in eyes with glaucoma.
33–35 Loss of more than 60% of retinal ganglion cells has been associated with a 3 dB sensitivity loss in the central 10° on standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
36 In addition to the reasons mentioned above, this gap between retinal ganglion cell loss and functional testing results also has been attributed to the limited number of testing points in standard automated perimetry and microperimetry. In our study, the test points were so sparse that they only occasionally hit the tiny areas of severe inner retinal defects deeper than the RNFL.
Regardless of whether retinal sensitivity loss associated with the inner retinal defects can be detected with these clinical functional tests, deep inner retinal defects involving the GCL are not favorable for healthy retinal sensitivity in the macula. When treated eyes have other fundus diseases that cause retinal sensitivity loss in the macula, such as glaucoma, retinitis pigmentosa, and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, the local structural damage may no longer be subclinical, but rather additive to the retinal sensitivity loss possibly causing a worsening quality of vision. These diseases are not rare, and indeed, it also is possible that in the future, the treated eyes may suffer other retinal diseases threatening retinal sensitivity in the macula. When this possibility is considered, the damage to the inner retina caused by ILM peeling should be minimized. In this regard, a lesser extent of ILM peeling may be better, although studies examining the effects of less extensive ILM peeling on macular hole closure rate must be done. Macular holes can be closed only by creating posterior vitreous detachment, particularly in eyes with small macular holes, although the success rate is lower than that for vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling. It may be valuable to consider minimally invasive surgery without ILM peeling or less extensive ILM peeling in eyes with prior or existing ocular diseases that can affect retinal sensitivity in the macula. In addition, enzymatic vitrectomy has been explored to treat macular holes, particularly for small macular holes. Information on adverse effects of current standard procedures of macular hole surgery will be important to guide and motivate the development of new treatments, and to facilitate future decisions to select surgical or medical treatments. Although macular hole surgery appears to be established in terms of macular hole closure, further efforts to sophisticate the case-by-case procedure for macular hole surgery to save all patients from unnecessary retinal sensitivity loss in the macula still are needed. Thus, it is important to be aware of the possible adverse effects of ILM peeling that cannot be known by routine clinical examinations.
The reason why deep inner retinal defects were found most frequently in the temporal macula was not determined. However, the temporal macula is where the RNFL is thinnest. It is possible that a thinner RNFL is more vulnerable to the effects of ILM peeling.
A limitation of our study is that we could not differentiate completely between inner retinal damage caused by ILM peeling and the mechanical damage of the surgical procedures. However, it is difficult to believe that mechanical damage during ILM peeling can generate the unique pattern of the DONFL appearance. In addition, the initial grasping of the ILM, which most likely touched the retinal nerve fibers, was done in the superior quadrants and not in the temporal quadrant. A second limitation is that we used color fundus photography. Blue light photography may be better for the detection of the DONFL appearance than color fundus photography. Three previous studies used blue light photography,
9–11 and 2 used color fundus photography,
12,19 and the incidences of DONFL appearance in these studies were not largely different. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that some eyes without a DONFL appearance on color fundus photography would have had DONFL appearance on blue filter photography. A third limitation is the small number and possible selection bias of the eyes we used for the MP-1 analysis. Surgeons might have used MP-1 because they found a marked DONFL appearance. This bias would be minimal when comparison was made on and away from the arcuate striae within each eye.
In conclusion, inner retinal defects that extended deeper than the RNFL were found frequently in the area of the DONFL appearance, especially in the temporal macula, after successful macular hole surgery with ILM peeling. A reduction of retinal sensitivity associated with the DONFL appearance was not common, probably because the deep inner retinal defects were limited to small focal areas. These inner retinal defects also were found in eyes without an evident DONFL appearance, which prevented us from comparing the retinal sensitivity loss between eyes with and without a DONFL appearance. Thus, the DONFL appearance in eyes after successful macular hole surgery with ILM peeling is associated, at least in part, with inner retinal damage, although this had negligible effect on the postoperative retinal sensitivity. It remains to be determined whether the local damage to the inner retinal layers after the macular hole surgery lead to clinically significant adverse effects in eyes with the other ocular diseases that can cause retinal sensitivity loss in the macula.