Approximately half the examined subjects were excluded from analysis because the quality of the EDI-OCT images was not good enough for reliable measurement of the depths of the LC or its insertion, possibly because of thicker prelaminar neural tissue, thicker scleral rim, or more significant vascular shadowing above the LC in the course of OCT beams in the excluded eyes. Therefore, it is possible that our results may be representative of a subgroup of healthy subjects with good visibility of the LC in EDI-OCT images. Additionally, as described in Methods, we delineated the anterior laminar surface as if the LC had no pores. It should be kept in mind that this study assessed the general morphology and position of the LC in healthy subjects, not focal undulation or spikiness of the LC in detail. We did not quantify the variability of our delineations of the anterior laminar surface. However, we think the variability was low enough not to have influenced the main outcomes of our study. Although we had 3D information, we used 2D EDI-OCT images to measure the depths of the LC and the LC insertion. This is because the measurements from the original 2D images might have been more accurate than those from the 3D images derived from 2D images. The Bruch's membrane edges, which were used as a reference point for LC depth measurements in this study, were aligned in one plane or were more posteriorly located in the superior and inferior areas than in the nasal and temporal areas in some eyes. This finding increases the significance of our results (horizontal central ridge of the LC and more posterior laminar insertion in the superior and inferior than in the nasal and temporal areas). To measure LC depth, we used the same principle used in previous reports (shortest distance from each delineated point on the anterior laminar surface to the line connecting the two Bruch's membrane edges).
11,20 LC depth was measured at discrete points in these reports.
11,20 To represent the LC depths from an infinite number of points on the anterior laminar surface, the mean LC depth was calculated by dividing the
area S by the
length D (
Fig. 1B) in our study. However, our LC depth data do not represent the LC depth of all the points on the entire anterior laminar surface because we measured them in discrete horizontal scans (11 scans). The measurement points of the LC insertion depth were not equally spaced along the laminar circumference, as shown in
Figure 1C. However, they were plotted in
Figure 3B and
Figure 4N as if they had been equally spaced because the relative distances between adjacent points varied among eyes. For example, in eyes with horizontally oval LC, this distance is greater in the superior and inferior areas than in the nasal and temporal areas, and vice versa. In addition, this distance is greater between laminar insertion points farther from the horizontal and vertical midlines. Because the OCT scans were directly exported from the OCT device and then uploaded to the 3D reconstruction software, our 3D results (
Fig. 5) depended on the ability of SD-OCT image alignment/registration software. In addition, our 3D images (
Fig. 5) contain interpolated information between each scan (distance between scans, approximately 30 μm). Lastly, our results depended solely on the EDI-OCT findings, which may be different from those of histologic examination or other imaging modalities.