During EAU in mice, Th1 and Th17 cells are expanded and recruited into the retina, and their levels vary during the course of the disease.
21,23 Therefore, we examined whether the resistance of
miR-155−/− mice to EAU derived in part from defects in generation of Th1 and Th17 cells. Freshly isolated LN (without stimulation) from WT or
miR-155−/− mice 21 days after immunization with IRBP/CFA were analyzed by the intracellular cytokine assay. In line with previous reports,
13,21 onset of EAU pathology was correlated temporally with increase of IL-17A
+ Th17 or IFN-γ
+ Th1 cells (
Fig. 3A). However, there was a marked defect in Th1 and Th17 development in
miR-155−/− mice. RNA analysis showed further that the Th17 cells were defective in IL-17A and IL-17F expression in the absence of miR-155 (
Fig. 3B). Consistent with reports showing that increase in Treg cells may contribute to mechanisms that mediate recovery from EAU,
24 the frequency of Foxp3-expressing T cells was elevated significantly in LN of the WT EAU mice (
Fig. 3C). Our results also are consistent with a defect in proliferative fitness of
miR-155−/− Treg cells as described previously.
3 Despite this reduction in Treg cells in the absence of miR-155, uveitis did not develop. In contrast, LN of unimmunized and IRBP-immunized miR-155-deficient mice contained similar frequencies of Treg cells (
Figs. 3A,
3C), indicating that miR-155 may be required for expansion of Treg cells during EAU, but not required for development of Tregs. Taken together, these results indicated that, while Tregs may have a role in the recovery from uveitis, disease etiology appear to derive ultimately from the role of miR-155 or other factors that mediate the generation and expansion of uveitogenic effector T cells. Recent studies suggest that miR-155 also may regulate host immunity by targeting genes that regulate T-helper cell lineage decisions.
25 For example, miR-155 was found to prolong IL-2–induced STAT5 signaling and confer competitive fitness to Treg cells by targeting the negative feedback regulator of cytokine signaling, Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 (SOCS1).
3 To verify this observation, we analyzed CD4
+ T cells from WT or
miR-155−/− mice for the expression of three SOCS family members induced in T-helper cells during CD4
+ T-cell differentiation. However, we found comparable levels of SOCS1, SOCS3, or cytokine-induced SH2-containing protein 1 (CIS1) expression by WT or miR-155–deficient T cells (
Fig. 3D). Taken together, these results suggested that miR-155 has wide-ranging effects on all CD4
+ lymphocytes, as well as, on many aspects of their immunoregulatory functions.