This study demonstrated that the loss of AQP0 specifically disrupts interlocking protrusions by dramatically changing their unique structural features (i.e., shape and size) during fiber cell differentiation and maturation in cortical regions of the lens. These structural changes resulted in the loss of function for interlocking protrusions to maintain the structural integrity of cortical fiber cells and eventually led to fiber cell separation, breakdown, and cataract formation in the lens core. The present study also demonstrated that AQP0 is particularly enriched in the interlocking protrusions in mouse lenses, which is consistent with observations in earlier studies.
49,57 Taken together, these results strongly suggest that AQP0, possibly functioning as an adhesion molecule, has a critical role in maintaining the normal shape and size of interlocking protrusions. Because the static normal tubular protrusions have transformed into motile elongating filopodia-like structures in the absence of AQP0, it is also postulated that AQP0 may serve as a regulatory or suppression molecule to regulate normal features of protrusions. In view of the vast distribution of interlocking protrusions extending from the superficial cortex to the nucleus of the entire lens,
1–3,6,7,9 the functional impact of AQP0 on the structural integrity and transparency of the lens is of substantial significance.
Although interlocking protrusions are an AQP0-rich domain, AQP0 is not required for the formation of protrusions as demonstrated in the AQP0-deficient lenses in this study (
Figs. 3,
4). This conclusion is partially supported by earlier findings that clathrin, AP-2 adapter, and actin cytoskeleton are specifically involved in the formation of interlocking domains.
8 The possible involvement of several other actin-based cytoskeletal proteins such as Arp2/3 complex,
58,59 formins,
60,61 and ezrin
62–64 in developing and maintaining the protrusions has also been implicated. A direct interaction between AQP0 and ezrin in the lens has been reported.
64 It is possible that AQP0 acts through interactions with the underlying ERM proteins and actin cytoskeletal complex in protrusions to regulate normal features of the interlocking domains. The present study showed that in the absence of AQP0 protrusions can develop and grow normally in young differentiating fiber cells but show signs of minor abnormalities at approximately 50 μm deep from the equatorial lens surface. This suggests that the rich accumulation of AQP0 in protrusions perhaps occurs shortly after protrusions are formed through a progressive (or massive) insertion of AQP0 proteins during fiber cell differentiation. A large distribution of AQP0-containing membrane vesicles in cell cytoplasm and the transport of these vesicles along microtubules in differentiating fiber cells have been reported in an earlier study.
65
Due to the extensive distribution of protrusions throughout the entire lens, the importance of these unique interlocking structures in maintaining the stability of fiber cells has been suggested repeatedly in earlier morphologic studies.
1–3,5,7–9 Our study for the first time to date uncovered an underlying mechanism by identifying AQP0 as a specific molecule controlling the normal structure of interlocking protrusions. This finding further manifested the fundamental importance of this structure and AQP0 to the lens.
Although our study unraveled different responses for type 1 and type 2 interlocking protrusions in the absence of AQP0 (
Figs. 3,
4), it is most likely that they have similar roles in maintaining the structural stability and transparency of fiber cells. Structurally, type 1 displayed a narrowed neck with an expanded head resembling a mushroom or lamellipodia, whereas type 2 exhibited a slender, tubular shape resembling filopodia (
Fig. 3). A detailed examination indicated that different combinations of interlocking patterns occurred regularly between these two protrusion types, namely, type 1 with type 1, type 2 with type 2, and type 1 with type 2 (
Fig. 3). These combining interlocking patterns strongly suggested that the two protrusion types are working together cooperatively and flexibly to achieve the most effective interlocking necessary for structural stability between neighboring fiber cells based on their spatial constraints (
Fig. 3). It is also conceivable that the different responses for the two protrusion types to the absence of AQP0 are due to their different actin cytoskeletal configurations. As in other cell types, type 1 protrusions are likely supported by a branched actin network that is regulated by Arp2/3 protein, whereas type 2 protrusions are formed by parallel bundles of unbranched actin filaments that are regulated by formins and fascin.
58–61 Under the condition without the suppression of AQP0, type 2 protrusions would be more favorable for uncontrolled elongation (
Figs. 3,
4). The presence of both branched and unbranched actin filament network in the developing lens interlocking domains has been shown in an earlier study.
8
It is notable that AQP0 has also been suggested to have an adhesion role, through its extracellular loops, to enhance gap junction coupling in superficial fibers during cell differentiation.
50 Furthermore, AQP0 is the major membrane protein of wavy square array (thin) junctions located primarily in the deep cortical fibers.
42–45 The wavy square array (thin) junctions may function to maintain the narrowed extracellular space between fiber cells to minimize light scattering. Nevertheless, the present study demonstrated that in the AQP0-deficient lens, while fiber cells are completely disrupted in the outer cortical regions, there are no intact deep cortical fibers remaining for wavy square array (thin) junctions to be formed. This further prioritizes the importance of AQP0 in targeting the interlocking protrusions for controlling the integrity and transparency of the lens during development and maturation.