The difference in the ratios between the baseline and post-HEA mfERG data were statistically evaluated using
t-tests. For K1, the respective superior and inferior responses in the HEA and fellow control eyes were similar for the 9 to 35 ms epochs (
Fig. 7A). The mean of the ratios comparing the responses of the K1 9 to 35 ms epoch approximated a numerical value of 1 for both the HEA (
P = 0.881) and fellow control (
P = 0.401) eyes. Ratios were also compared for the K1 40 to 70 ms epoch responses (
Fig. 7B). RMS ratios of the inferior/axotomized region of the HEA and fellow control eyes were found to be significantly decreased (
P < 0.00004) in comparison to baseline responses. The ratios comparing the responses of the superior/uninjured region of the HEA and fellow control eyes were found to also be significantly decreased (
P < 0.036) in comparison to baseline responses. However, when compared within individual animals, no significant difference was found between baseline and post-HEA RMS ratios in the superior (uninjured) region (
P = 0.585, 0.090, 0.208, 0.136). Significant decreases in RMS ratios were seen postendodiathermy as compared to baseline response ratios in the inferior (HEA) region in three of the four individual animals (
P < 0.004, 0.011, 0.639, 0.008). The averaged RMS ratio (HEA versus fellow control eyes) of the K2.1 (1–80 ms epoch) response for the seven-element hexagon groups was not significantly different (
P = 0.761) between baseline and post-HEA responses from the superior (uninjured) retina (
Fig. 7C). The RMS ratio of the K2.1 mfERG of the inferior retina, however, was found to be significantly decreased (
P < 0.008).