To assess whether there was any change in RGC density after IOP elevation, retinas from all four groups groups were stained with an antibody against Brn3a. Antibodies against Brn3a label most (92%–95%) RGCs, and it is known that Brn3a is a reliable marker to identify and quantify RGC density in both normal retinas and retinas with RGC loss.
77,86,87 The Brn3a-positive RGC density (
Fig. 6) was equivalent in experimental and control retinas (
P = 0.74) and across all groups (
P = 0.34). This indicates that there was no loss of RGCs at even 6 weeks (2998 ± 347 cells/mm
2 in the experimental eyes and 2844 ± 282 cells/mm
2 in the control eyes of group 2) after the 8-hour IOP elevation event relative to normal naive rats (2772 ± 250 cells/mm
2 in the right eyes and 2823 ± 139 cells/mm
2 in the left eyes of group 4) and sham rats (2574 ± 300 cells/mm
2 in the experimental eyes and 2538 ± 391 cells/mm
2 in the control eyes of group 3). The RGC densities determined by Brn3a labeling over a large region of central retina in this study are slightly higher than those reported for pigmented rats in a previous study (1331 ± 129 cells/mm
2),
87 which were also determined by Brn3a immunohistochemistry. This is likely because the previous study determined the average density for the entire retina, whereas estimates in the present study were derived without including the far periphery, where RGC density is lower. However, RGC densities derived from retrograde Fluorogold labeling for a similar area of retina as the present study are comparable in another study
91 (2113 ± 144 cells/mm
2) to those found in this study using Brn3a. Although the densities derived in the present study by Brn3a analysis are comparable to those derived by retrograde transport of CTB for a similar retinal sample area and imaged by microscopy, the densities derived in vivo by CSLO imaging are slightly lower (
Table 3), despite being based on a more central portion of the retina, probably because of a combination of lower resolution and signal-to-noise ratio compared with postmortem, microscopy-derived estimates.