Herein, we demonstrate effective delivery of macromolecules to rabbit eye in vivo by low frequency and low intensity ultrasound. No undesirable effects were found on visual function and ocular tissue integrity. The results highlight the potential of a noninvasive approach to deliver high molecular weight therapeutics to the back of the eye.
The data here support that ultrasound increases the inward flux of large molecules to an extent that overcomes the static and dynamic barriers in the transscleral route of delivery. Structurally, the barriers include sclera, choroid, brunch's membrane, and retinal pigment epithelium. Molecules may also be cleared by the blood flow of episclera and choroid, the lymphatic vessels, as well as the outward fluid flow due to intraocular pressure.
26 Passive diffusion of macromolecules across tissue barriers is even slower because of its large size.
7 Many important therapeutics for posterior eye diseases are biomacromolecules (e.g., bevacizumab at 149 kDa, ranibizumab at 48 kDa, pegaptanib at 50 kDa, and aflibercept at 97 kDa).
3,5,27 Although protein and DNA are permeable across sclera—the outmost hydrophilic barrier in the transscleral route—the diffusivity is relatively low.
19,28 This property on top of the dynamic clearance makes it challenging for macromolecules topically applied on the sclera to be transported to the posterior segment.
29 This is consistent with our observation in the control experiment with the macromolecular probe, FITC-dextran of 70 kDa. The level found in vitreous is below the detectable limit (
Fig. 3). A single sonication cycle at the chosen parameters was capable of overcoming the transscleral barrier to deliver a detectable amount of dextran into the vitreous. Notably, repeating the number of sonication cycles, there is a dramatic, nonlinear enhancement in the effectiveness of delivery. The concentration of macromolecular probe found in vitreous was at a range that, when applied to protein therapeutic, is sufficient to produce biological effects.
3,30,31 Further investigations on ultrasound-enhanced delivery of therapeutics will be required to optimize and establish if the enhancement is sufficient for clinical applications.
In our study, the control group was done without placing ultrasound transducer above the eye. A custom-made adapter containing aqueous solution was placed between the ultrasound probe and the sclera surface to enable the transmission of ultrasound. This also means that there is no direct contact of the ultrasound probe and the scleral surface, so that the mechanical force exerted by the probe in the absence of ultrasound is negligible. The lack of effect by probe action alone was also supported by our previous observation that ultrasound applied at high frequency resulted in no enhancement of intrascleral penetration by macromolecules.
20 On the other hand, the effect on the transscleral delivery depends on the variation in ultrasound parameters.
21,22
The choice of low frequency in this study was based on previous results from our group, showing that transscleral penetration of macromolecules increases with decreasing frequency.
20,32 The acoustic intensity used was far below the value used in transdermal delivery
33,34 and cancer-targeted delivery.
35–37 Measuring the peak rarefaction pressure at this low intensity (I
SATA: 0.12 W/cm
2) enabled us to calculate the MI (
Supplementary Material). As the name suggests, MI is a measure of the mechanical effect of ultrasound. For safety reasons, the upper limit of MI was set up by US Food and Drug Administration and The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM).
38 Although there is no direct guideline to ocular drug delivery, the MI limit for ophthalmic diagnosis is 0.23. MI of experiments in this report was 0.20, which is well below the regulatory limit previously mentioned. The regulatory agency also imposes a control on the temperature rise by ultrasound, recommending the thermal index (TI) to be below 1.0.
39 (The calculation of TI is shown in the
Supplementary Material.) Because of the low acoustic intensity and the short duration time in each cycle, temperature rise was negligible. Therefore, the ultrasound parameters in this study are chosen after considering both delivery efficiency and safety guideline.
While ultrasound enhances transscleral delivery, the window of effective delivery must be temporary for the method to be deemed noninvasive. The barrier against the entry of nonindigenous substance must be weakened, but only for a short period of time, in order to balance with the risk of infection. The transscleral barrier showed a gradual healing process over 14 days after sonication (Table). By the end of this period, the macromolecular probe could not be detected in the vitreous, supporting the “opening” created by ultrasound was not permanent. The restoration property is crucial in future clinical application because scleral barrier has to reseal for eye protection. After intravitreal injection, the needle hole in conjunctiva and sclera requires several days to heal and water-seal.
40 Evaluation of the duration of ultrasound effect is only one aspect in addressing safety issues that may arise from the new approach. We examined the ultrasound-treated eye with three complementary techniques to assess if any side effect is produced on ocular tissue structure and visual function.
Full-field electroretinography provides insight into the global electrical response of retina to photic stimulation. Results indicated that the ultrasound did not affect either the cone or the rod system (
Fig. 4). Two key parameters were extracted in ffERG analysis: the amplitude from baseline to the trough of a-wave and the amplitude of b-wave from trough of a-wave to the peak of b-wave. A-wave is contributed by photoreceptors and reflects the physiological condition of photoreceptors.
41–43 B-wave is contributed by the secondary sensory neurons, mainly by on-center bipolar cells and Müller cells.
44 If the photoreceptors are damaged, the a-wave will be affected, and hence the b-wave; if the signal transduction from photoreceptors to bipolar cells is affected or the bipolar cells are damaged, an abnormal b-wave will occur. For the photopic ERG, since the rods are bleached by bright light, the ERG signals are contributed by cone systems. For the scotopic ERG, since the rods are much more sensitive than cones in a dark environment, the ERG signals are mainly contributed by rod system after a dark adaptation. We found no significant change, neither short-term (1 day) nor long-term (14 days), in the amplitude of a- and b-waves of photopic and scotopic ERG after US. The waveforms of photopic and scotopic ERG at all the time points sampled did not show any abnormality (
Supplementary Material), further supporting that ultrasound at the chosen parameters did not influence the electrical response of retinal cells upon photic stimulation.
Ocular tissue was examined by BIO for macroscopic images, and then by histology for microscopic morphology. No damage was found. BIO images indicated that the overall structure of the posterior segment of the treated rabbit eyes remained intact. No gross damage such as hemorrhage, edema, or neovascularization was noted up to 14 days after ultrasound application (
Fig. 5). Microscopically, the overall morphology of the retina and sclera of ultrasound-treated eyes was not found to be modified when compared with unoperated eyes under ×100 and ×400 magnification (
Fig. 7). In the sections, retinal ganglion cells appeared to be absent in the ganglion cell layer of the retina. This can be explained by the finding that the distribution of ganglion cells at superior peripheral retina near the ora serrata is low, at only approximately 800 cells/mm
2.
45,46 The thickness of the sclera or retina is an indication of the integrity of the layer, as any damage to the sclera or retina would lead to cell death and shrinkage of the layer (
Fig. 6). The observed unchanged thickness of sclera and retina suggests that the sclera and retina is not disrupted by ultrasound treatment. We further measured the thickness of the ONL as ONL is comprised of cell bodies of the photoreceptors (
Fig. 6). The observation that ONL thickness was not significantly changed after ultrasound treatment was consistent with the unaffected a-wave amplitude, further supporting that the ultrasound treatment causes no significant change to the structure of the posterior segment of the eye.