The present study was undertaken to uncover the roles of EPPK in homeostasis of corneal epithelium by using a mouse line with EPPK deficiency. Here EPPK was detected mainly in the basal cells of WT corneal epithelium. In epidermis, EPPK is reportedly expressed in the upper layer more markedly as compared with the basal layer.
5,6 The exact reason for this difference is to be studied, although the presence/absence of keratinization might be related to this difference.
First, we examined if lacking EPPK affects the morphogenesis of corneal epithelium by employing histology. Light microscopic histology with HE staining and ultrastructural observation both suggested the presence of morphologically basal-like cells above the layer of real basal cells (suprabasal layer). Morphological evaluation of the shape of the DAPI-labeled nuclei of basal and suprabasal cells of the corneal epithelium was performed; the nuclei of both basal and suprabasal cells of the KO corneal epithelium were more markedly round, or less flattened, as compared with those of the WT cornea. These findings suggest the presence of basal-like cells in the suprabasal layer of the KO epithelium. To confirm this notion we then performed immunohistochemistry for keratin 14, a marker for basal cells of the stratified epithelium, and observed the expression of keratin 14 in the cells above the basal cell layer. This indicates the presence of basal-like cells in the suprabasal layer of the corneal epithelium and that the loss of EPPK impairs the normal differentiation of stratified epithelium of the cornea. Explanation includes that loss of EPPK expression affects regulatory volume ion transport mechanism activity leading to a change in nuclear shape. Such a change may be associated with an increase in keratin 14 expression. Such multilayerization of keratin 14–positive cells is not observed in KO epidermis.
15 The phenotype of impaired intraepithelial differentiation of corneal epithelium was observed in adult mice, but not mice until P14, indicating that the abnormality is age-dependent.
The present study also revealed the fragility of the corneal epithelium in the absence of EPPK. A gentle brushing readily damaged the corneal epithelium of a KO mouse, but not in a WT mouse. Ultrastructural observation of the basal cells of the corneal epithelium showed less keratin fiber adhering to the desmosomes in a KO mouse. A high-power magnification observation showed the cell membrane of a damaged and removed cell remains adhered to a neighboring cell. This might suggest the presence of abnormal or attenuated cytoskeletal framework in the cytoplasm. The resistance of the epidermal tissue against a mechanical intervention has not been tested. In epidermis, but not in cornea, fragility was induced by the loss of other components of a desmosome, desmocolollin-1 or plakophilin-1, suggesting desmosomal abnormality impairs the integrity of the epithelial architecture.
16,17 A similar finding was reported in an in vitro experiment; the loss of plakoglobin attenuates desmosome-intermediate filament connection, leading to fragility in cultured keratinocytes.
14 It was previously reported that the loss of keratin 12, a corneal epithelium-specific keratin, results in the attenuated integrity (thus fragile) in mice, although the epithelium of an EPPK-null mouse cornea was labeled with antikeratin 12 antibody. Because EPPK is involved in the architecture of intermediate filament cytoskeleton, the epithelial fragility in an EPPK-null mouse is considered to be consistent with the finding in a keratin 12 null mouse.
12 EPPK was originally identified as an autoantigen in a patient with a subepidermal blistering disease. The present ultrastructural examination suggests less keratin bundle adhesion to a hemidesmosome. This finding is consistent with the reduced diameter of keratin filaments in KO keratinocytes.
18 However, the KO mouse does not develop epithelial defects in cornea, as suggested by the finding that basal cells seem to adhere well to the basement membrane, as shown by the brushing experiment.
Expression of keratin 12 was similarly detected in a KO epithelium (data not shown) as discussed above, indicating that the loss of EPPK does not impair cornea-type epithelial differentiation. To further evaluate the differentiation pattern of the corneal epithelium of a KO mouse, we then examined the expression pattern of cell–cell junction-related components by using immunohistochemistry and real-time RT-PCR. Our unpublished data showed that knockdown of EPPK by using a small interfering RNA procedure in an immortalized corneal epithelial cell line reduced the mRNA and protein expression level of E-cadherin. The results obtained by immunohistochemistry of in vivo specimens showed no difference of the staining intensity for desmocollin-1, desmocollin-3, desmoglein-1 (α and β), desmoplakin-1, plakoglobin, and occluding between WT and KO corneal epithelia. However, immunoreactivity for E-cadherin was less marked in a KO epithelium as compared with that of a WT corneal epithelium. To examine if the protein expression as detected by immunohistochemistry depends on mRNA expression, we also ran real-time RT-PCR for mRNA of E-cadhesin, desmoplakin, and desmoglein-1 (1α and 1β), and showed that E-cadherin mRNA expression was suppressed by the loss of EPPK. An in vitro experiment previously showed that expression of a desmosome-related component affects E-cadherin expression; overexpression of desmoglein-3 decreases E-cadherin expression.
19 The mechanism of suppression of E-cadherin expression by the loss of EPPK is to be explored.
The incidence of BrdU-labeled cells in an uninjured KO epithelium was similar to that in a WT cornea. However, uptake of BrdU was significantly less in the EPPK-null corneal epithelium than in a WT epithelium under the healing condition (i.e., at 24 hours). However, the exact mechanism of how the loss of EPPK suppresses cell proliferation activity in healing corneal epithelium is yet to be uncovered. It is known that a component of the desmosome affects cell cycle in epithelial tissue positively or negatively.
20 For example, epidermal hyperplasia is observed in a desmocolin-1–null mouse.
16 Desmoplakin also negatively regulates keratinocyte cell proliferation by, in part, regulating cell cycle progression.
21 On the other hand, overexpression of desmoglein-2 or -3 induces keratinocyte hyperproliferation in the epidermis, suggesting that the desmocolins-2/3 positively regulate cell cycle progression.
22,23 However, the present study showed that the expression of these cell–cell junction components, except for desmoglein-1 that was not examined, were not altered by the loss of EPPK. Thus, lacking EPPK might directly affect cell cycle regulation. Except for possible relationship between desmosomal components and cell cycle regulation, expression of keratin 14 reportedly affects cell proliferation; keratin 14 expression positively correlates with cell proliferation.
24 However, the present study showed proliferation activity of EPPK-null corneal epithelium was less as compared with that in a WT epithelium, even though KO epithelium contains keratin 14–positive suprabasal cells above the basal layer.
It was reported that deficiency of E-cadherin promotes the conversion of an epithelial cell to that of a more migratory phenotype or accelerates epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a process through which an epithelial cell type transforms its phenotype to be more mesenchymal-like.
25,26 Suppression of E-cadherin therefore might accelerate movement of corneal epithelium in a KO mouse. To explore this hypothesis, we then examined the effect of lacking EPPK on epithelial wound healing in the cornea in vivo. The healing of a round epithelial defect in the cornea was more rapid in a KO mouse as compared with a WT mouse. The BrdU-labeled experiment showed that lacking EPPK attenuates the cell proliferation activity in the injured/healing epithelium of the cornea, as in an uninjured one. This indicates that acceleration of repair of the epithelial defect was caused by stimulation of epithelial cell migration, but not cell proliferation, in the absence of EPPK. However, there is a possibility that the mechanism of promotion of migration of corneal epithelial cells is attributable to multiple mechanisms. It is known that alteration of expression of cell–cell connection-related components affect cell migration. For example, protein expression of desmosomal components is reduced in corneal epithelium during wound healing in rats.
27 The in vitro study presented further evidence that desmosomal components negatively modulate epithelial cell migration; lacking a component of desmosome, plakophilin-1 or plakoglobin, accelerates cell migration of cultured epidermal keratinocytes.
28,29 It has also been shown that desmosomal molecules are downregulated in certain cancers, such as squamous cell carcinomas; suppression of expression of plakophilin-3, another desmosomal component, reduces cell adhesion of a neoplastic cell and promotes metastasis.
30 In turn, overexpression of desmosomal cadherins has been inversely correlated with invasive potential and reduced motility in neoplastic cells.
31,32 As for the multilayerization of keratin 14–labeled cells in a KO epithelium that was discussed above, a reduction of E-cadherin expression and an impairment of desmosome architecture might have allowed the basal cells to simply move upward without undergoing differentiation.
It was suggested that fewer keratin 6 bundles might explain the acceleration of cell migration in KO epidermis, because lacking keratin 6 reportedly promotes epidermal keratinocyte migration.
7 However, our unpublished data from an in vitro cell culture experiment showed EPPK knockdown did not affect the protein expression level of keratin 6. Because cell adhesion might affect cytoplasmic signaling activation, further study is needed to examine the relationship between EPPK deficiency and cell migration–related signals.
In conclusion, the loss of EPPK affects morphogenesis of the corneal epithelium as well as its integrity. The mechanism of acceleration of cell migration in the KO corneal epithelium is to be further investigated, although suppression of expression of E-cadherin might be included.