Arecent article in
IOVS by Katz et
al.
1 reported the reversible accumulation of
lipofuscin-like inclusions in the retinal pigment epithelium of rats
given a single intravitreal injection of the protease inhibitor
leupeptin. Although the experimental component of the study was
comprehensive, we feel that the interpretation of the results was
potentially misleading, particularly because the authors had ignored
some fundamental aspects of lipofuscin biochemistry. First, RPE
lipofuscin is likely to be heterogeneous, because it will be derived
from both autophagy and the degradation of photoreceptor outer segments
(POS). This is confirmed by a variety of studies that demonstrate that
lipofuscin-like granules naturally accumulate in RPE cells in the
absence of POS
2 3 and that this process can be accelerated
by protease inhibitors and certain calcium
antagonists.
2 3 4 Second, the lipofuscin-like granules
generated by protease inhibitors and calcium antagonists in vitro have
very different chemical constituents to those of “true” lipofuscin
granules isolated from RPE cells.
4 These granules, while
exhibiting the broad band fluorescence of lipofuscin (which is not
retinoid dependent, as suggested by Katz et al.
1 ), do not
contain the classic lipid-soluble fluorophores associated with true
lipofuscin. This discrepancy has been highlighted by both
ourselves
4 and previously by Katz et al.
5 Third, even when protease inhibitors are used in conjunction with POS,
the resultant granules generated in vitro fail to exhibit the classic
fluorophores associated with true lipofuscin.
4 Fourth, the
recently identified pyridinium
bis-retinoid,
6 otherwise termed A2E, has a chemical structure that makes it resistant
to lysosomal degradation. This also may be true for other fluorophores
within true lipofuscin. Finally, we have loaded cultured RPE cells with
true lipofuscin for periods up to 56 days and failed to observe any
degradation or change in lipofuscin composition (Boulton M, unpublished
results). Although it could be argued that the lysosomal system is less
functional in cultured RPE, it is certainly sufficient to digest
phagocytosed POS. We feel that the data presented by Katz et
al.
1 adds further support to the above raised points.
Formation of high levels of large inclusions of lipofuscin-like
material was observed in rats shortly after leupeptin administration,
but this was not reflected by a corresponding increase in overall
cellular fluorescence by 20 weeks. Thus, it is likely that the
autofluorescent granules that are transiently, and rapidly, upregulated
after leupeptin treatment in the Katz study simply reflect a buildup of
phagosomal material (phagosomes are known to be weakly autofluorescent)
which is rapidly destroyed once the effect of leupeptin has worn off.
The loss of this leupeptin-induced material, together with the observed
continuous and equal increase in cellular fluorescence in both the
control and treated cell populations after prolonged incubation, is
further evidence to the differences in composition between “true”
lipofuscin and lipofuscin-like granules.