Abstract
purpose. To investigate the incidence and waveform characteristics of periodic
alternating nystagmus (PAN) in congenital nystagmus (CN).
methods. In a prospective study, 18 patients with CN without associated sensory
defects agreed to undergo eye movement documentation using binocular
infrared oculography. Two of the 18 had a diagnosis of suspected PAN
before entering the study. The patients sat in a dimly lit room and
viewed an LED (4 mm in diameter) located in the primary position, at a
distance of 100 cm. During an 8-minute recording, patients were read a
story of neutral interest to hold attention at a constant level. PAN
was defined as a left-beating nystagmus, a transition phase, a
right-beating nystagmus, and a final transition phase; the sequence was
then repeated.
results. Seven of the 18 patients had PAN (median cycle: 223 seconds, range
180–307 seconds). The periodicity of the cycles for each adult patient
was regular, although the phases within a cycle were often asymmetric.
Six of the seven patients had an anomalous head posture (AHP), and in
five the AHP was in only one direction. Except for one patient, the PAN
waveforms had an increasing slow-phase velocity in at least one phase
of the cycle; in the other phase they were linear.
conclusions. The occurrence of PAN in CN is not as rare as previously thought and
can be missed because of the long cycles and the use of only one AHP.
The AHP was dependent on, and could be predicted from, the waveforms
containing the longest foveation times. Although the waveforms and
foveation times may differ among the phases of the PAN cycle, the
periodicity of the cycle was usually regular and therefore predictable.
Identification of PAN is essential in cases in which surgical treatment
is considered for correction of AHPs.
Congenital periodic alternating nystagmus (CN + PAN) is a
specific form of infantile nystagmus that is involuntary and conjugate
and involves regular epochs of “active” and “quiet”
phases.
1 A cycle of PAN includes a left-beating nystagmus,
a quiet or transitional phase, a right-beating nystagmus, and a second
transitional phase. Patients with congenital PAN, as with CN, rarely
report oscillopsia.
2 3 4
Congenital PAN had been thought to be a rare
occurrence.
5 6 7 However, two recent reports, using eye
movement recordings as the basis for diagnosis, have shown that PAN is
prevalent in CN associated with albinism
1 and in CN
patients with and without sensory defects.
8 Abadi and
Pascal
1 reviewed the eye movements of 32 CN patients with
oculocutaneous or ocular albinism and found that 12 patients (37.5%)
had PAN. In general, the nystagmus intensity varied over the PAN cycle.
None of the 12 patients had an anomalous head posture (AHP) or were
able to null the nystagmus with convergence. Gradstein et
al.
8 performed a retrospective analysis of clinical
findings from approximately 200 CN patients with and without sensory
defects and found 18 patients (9%) with a diagnosis ofPAN.
Five of these 18 had albinism; all but two used AHPs. Both studies
concluded that congenital PAN is underdiagnosed.
AHPs are used by patients with CN to maximize visual acuity by placing
the eyes in the orbital location where nystagmus is least. When an AHP
causes physical or social discomfort, surgery should be considered to
move the null point to the center of gaze. In the case of PAN, the AHP
is more difficult to detect, because the null point changes orbital
location and could result in intermittent or more than one AHP.
The focus of this study was to investigate the incidence of PAN,
including a description of cycle time and waveform characteristics in
patients with PAN who do not have sensory defects. It is this group of
patients in which misidentification of the null point may lead to
inappropriate surgery.
Eighteen CN patients who did not report oscillopsia, ranging in
age from 11 to 57 years (13 males and 5 females), participated in this
study (
Table 1 . As far as possible, an effort was made during patient
recruitment to select only CN patients without sensory defects referred
by colleagues from surrounding medical centers.
All participants underwent ophthalmologic examination before testing.
Patients with visual acuity less than 0.5 and no obvious sensory
deficit underwent further electrophysiological testing. Visual evoked
potential examinations were performed to rule out albinism and optic
nerve lesions, and flash electroretinograms (ERGs) or pattern ERGs were
performed to test for the presence of possible inherited retinal
degeneration or dystrophies. Neuroimaging (computed tomography or
magnetic resonance imaging) of the posterior fossa was performed on the
children in the study to rule out optic nerve compression.
Investigations were performed according to the guidelines of the
Declaration of Helsinki. Subjects were fully informed about the nature
of the procedures and gave their written consent before the beginning
of the testing. The parents of the two children in the study signed the
consent form.
The patients sat in a dimly lit room and were instructed to fixate
a stationary LED (4 mm in diameter) located in the primary position, at
a distance of 100 cm. Head movements were minimized using chin and head
rests. Each subject’s eye movements were recorded for an average
duration of 8 minutes, except in the case of the two children, who
underwent eye movement recordings for 4 to 5 minutes. During the
session, patients were read stories of neutral interest to hold
attention at a constant level. Binocular, horizontal eye movements were
recorded using an infrared limbal reflection technique (resolution,
0.1°; range, ± 20°). Eye movements were calibrated monocularly and
binocularly before and after the 8-minute recording session. The eye
position signals were digitized at 250 Hz and stored on computer for
off-line analysis.
The following features of the nystagmus were examined:
amplitude (peak-to-peak slow-phase displacement), frequency (number of
oscillations per second), expanded foveation time (the period when the
slow-phase velocity was between 0° and 10°/sec), beat direction of
the fast phase, and, when found, cycles of PAN.
Fast-phase components of the PAN recordings were detected
automatically using velocity and acceleration criteria. The remaining
slow-phase regions were checked manually, to eliminate artifacts and
undetected fast phases; then, the mean slow-phase velocity over each
second of the eye movement recording was found. Plots of these mean
slow-phase velocities versus time provided a concise illustration of
the PAN cycles.
For foveation time to have a meaningful relationship to acuity, the
target image must lie within the foveal area, and retinal slip velocity
must be low. When we measured the amount of time (beat-to-beat
throughout the PAN cycle) that velocity was within a ±4°/sec window,
few waveforms had periods of 60 msec or longer. Thus the usefulness of
the method was less obvious. For clarity, plots were based on a
velocity criterion of ±10°/sec to assist identification of best
foveation times. This method describes the portion of the cycle that
afforded best visual acuity and indicates a cause for a preferred AHP.
In two cases, (patients 15 and 17), in which linear or decreasing
slow-phase velocities occurred, the analysis was referred to as“
low-velocity” time.
Thirty-nine percent of the sample had PAN, which is consistent
with the percentage reported in CN patients with
albinism.
1 One important clinical difference between the
two sample groups is that none of the CN patients with albinism had an
AHP, which would exclude them as candidates for surgical correction. It
is not surprising that patients with sensory deficits (in this case,
albinism) may not use AHPs, because increasing foveation time by way of
a head turn would not markedly improve visual acuity.
Gradstein et al.
8 and earlier
investigators
5 6 7 11 12 reported a lower percentage of PAN
in CN than either this study or the study by Abadi and
Pascal.
1 Some factors that may have influenced this
difference beyond the inherent limitations of a retrospective analysis,
are as follows.
-
PAN may have been missed because of the long duration of a cycle.
Gradstein et al.
8 used 2 to 3 minutes of continuous
straight-ahead recording time. Our study showed that median PAN cycles
were approximately 4 minutes and could be as long as 5 minutes.
-
The absence of control for attention during the recording session. This
factor has been pointed out by Gradstein et al.8p927 It
can affect arousal and thereby modify nystagmus intensity. Although
recording sessions were long in our study, it was not difficult to
maintain the attention of the patients with the aid of storytelling.
All participants, including the two children, could easily comply with
the task demand and listen to the stories.Further, the
recordings from the adult patients provided evidence that PAN found in
CN can have regular, predictable cycles, which is critical when surgery
is indicated.
-
PAN may have been missed in the past, because patients may have used
only one head turn. Patients with CN and PAN deploy strategies to use
the waveform that affords the longest foveation times and thereby
optimizes visual acuity. For example, as in patient 1 of our study, an
AHP to the left was optimal for left-beating nystagmus. This is because
a left AHP puts the eyes in right gaze position where left-beating
nystagmus is minimal. The left-beating nystagmus could not be nulled
when the eyes wereplaced in left orbital gaze. Therefore, a
patient with PAN may use only one head turn, as was observed in five of
the seven patients in this study, and this may be an important reason
why the disorder had been missed in the past.
Findings from our study not only underscore the importance of
diagnosing PAN but also show the advantage of describing the waveform
characteristics that may be useful in determining the optimal surgical
procedure. Review of the mean and peak slow-phase velocities along with
the foveation time of each slow phase during the recording indicates
which part of the cycle yields the best visual acuity and predicts the
AHP that would most benefit the patient.
Although studies with larger sample sizes are needed to provide the
evidence necessary to suggest how long a patient with suspected PAN
should be observed to determine whether PAN is present, our study
provides two guidelines:
-
If the predominant waveform is bidirectional (for example,
pseudopendular), unidirectional with an alternating direction, or a
mixture of bidirectional waveforms, the chance that PAN is present is
negligible.
-
In the case of a predominant jerk waveform, the methods presented in
this study should be adequate to detect most PAN cycles.
The role of eye muscle surgery in patients with congenital
PAN is still uncertain. Gradstein et al.
8 recently
compared the outcome of the
Kestenbaum
9 –Anderson
10 procedures with large
recessions of all four horizontal muscles
13 and found that
the latter procedure yielded satisfactory results for correction of
AHPs. However, this may not always be the operation of choice for PAN,
as suggested by the authors. A patient may have one consistent AHP as
well as foveation characteristics that suggest a procedure that
attempts to move the null zone from eccentric to primary gaze, as in
patient 3 of our study who had a 20° to 25° left AHP and showed PAN
that almost completely cycled within a left-beating nystagmus
(Fig. 2) .
Using an animal model, Dell’Osso et al.
14 suggested that
an extraocular muscle tenotomy may be sufficient to damp nystagmus and
improve visual acuity when AHPs are inconsistent and convergence does
not diminish nystagmus intensity. The advantage of this procedure may
be the elimination of double vision in extreme lateral gaze, which
sometimes occurs after large rectus muscle recession procedures. This
technique has yet to be used in patients in a controlled trial.
In summary, the occurrence of PAN in CN is not as rare as
previously suggested and can be missed because of long cycles and the
patient’s preference for only one AHP. Although phases within a PAN
cycle can be asymmetric (greater duration of beating in one direction
over the other), evidence indicates that the cycles of PAN in CN are
usually regular and that the motion of the null is not susceptible to
modification. This is in contrast to the waveform and foveation
characteristics of the nystagmus. Identification of PAN and its
waveform characteristics are essential in cases in which surgical
treatment is considered for correction of AHPs.
Submitted for publication December 21, 1998; revised May 27, 1999; accepted June 15, 1999.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
Corresponding author: Josephine Shallo–Hoffmann, College of Optometry,
Nova Southeastern University Health Professions Division, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida. E-mail:
[email protected]
Patient | Age | Sex | Visual Acuity (Snellen) | Stereopsis* | Diagnosis |
1 | 30 | M | 0.3; 0.3 | Nil | CN, PAN+ infantile esotropia |
2 | 28 | M | 0.5; 0.5 | 50 | CN |
3 | 40 | M | 0.67; 0.67 | 140 | CN, PAN |
4 | 27 | M | 1.2; 1.0 | 40 | CN, PAN |
5 | 33 | M | 0.5; 0.5 | TNO: 480 | CN |
6 | 19 | M | 0.5; 0.33 | 800 | CN |
7 | 57 | F | 0.67; 0.67 | TNO: 240 | Autosomal dominantly inherited CN |
8 | 26 | F | 0.5; 0.25 | TNO: 800 | Autosomal dominantly inherited CN |
9 | 47 | M | 0.33; 0.33 | 80 | CN |
10 | 38 | M | 0.25; 0.25 | 200 | Inherited CN, PAN |
11 | 38 | F | 0.5; 0.5 | 50 | Inherited CN |
12 | 26 | F | 0.67; 0.67 | 40 | CN |
13 | 20 | M | 0.67; 0.67 | 200–100 | CN |
14 | 55 | M | 0.67; 0.5 | 100 | CN |
15 | 12 | M | 0.25; 0.33 | Nil | CN, PAN+ exophoria |
16 | 25 | M | 0.33; 0.5 | 60 | CN |
17 | 11 | F | 0.33; 0.33 | Nil | CN, PAN+ infantile strabismus |
18 | 29 | M | 0.5; 0.5 | 100 | CN, PAN |
Table 2. PAN Waveform Characteristics
Table 2. PAN Waveform Characteristics
Patient | Anomalous Head Posture | Mean PAN Cycle (sec) | Predominant Waveform | Mean Phase Duration (sec) | Mean Amplitude (deg) | Mean Frequency (Hz) | Peak Slow-Phase Velocity (°/sec) |
1 | 10° Left | 185 sec | Left jerk | 70 | 8.8 | 3.0 | 60 |
| | | Transition (PP) | 18 | 6.9 | 4.0 | 75 (spv left) 37 (spv right) |
| | | Right jerk | 75 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 25 |
3 | 20–25° Left | 180 sec | Left jerk | 84 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 57 |
| | | Transition (nulled) | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | | Right jerk | 10 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 8 |
4 | 10° Right | 236 sec | Left jerk | 157 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 25 |
| | | Transition (nulled) | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | | Right jerk | 96 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 55 |
10 | 0–10° Right intermittent | 293 sec | Left jerk | 188 | 9.5 | 4.0 | 44 |
| | | Transition (pendular/triangular) | 5 | 4.8 | 2.0 | 5 |
| | | Right jerk | 178 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 39 |
15 | 0–10° Left intermittent | 221 sec | Left jerk | 140 (lin spv) | 6.5 | 3.0 | 83 |
| | | Transition (nulled) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| | | Right jerk | 178 (dec spv) | 5.9 | 4.0 | 61 |
17 | 0–10° Left alternating | 307 sec | Left jerk | 192 (lin spv) | 5–10 | 5.0 | 107 |
| | | Transition (pendular) | 96 | 0.65 | 8.0 | 49 |
| | | Right jerk | 340 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 55 |
18 | Nil | 223 sec | Left jerk | 90 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 38 |
| | | Transition (pendular) | 13 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 44 |
| | | Right jerk | 93 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 55 |
Table 3. CN Waveform Characteristics
Table 3. CN Waveform Characteristics
Patient | Anomalous Head Posture | Predominant Waveform | Mean Amplitude (deg) | Mean Frequency (Hz) | Peak Slow-Phase Velocity (°/sec) |
2 | Nil | Pseudopendular right and left | 4.2 | 3.5 | 47 (spv left) |
| | | | | 50 (spv right) |
5 | 10–15° Right | Pseudo-pendular left | 4.38 | 3.0 | 32 (spv right) |
6 | 10° Right tilt | Pseudo-pendular right and left | 2.0 | 6.0 | 21 (spv left) |
| | | | | 35 (spv right) |
7 | Nil | Pseudo-pendular right and left | 5.0 | 6.0 | 46 (spv left) |
| | | | | 26 (spv right) |
8 | Nil | Pseudo-pendular right and left | 1.5 | 6.0 | 34 (spv left) |
| | | | | 14 (spv right) |
9 | 0–10° Left | Right jerk; elongated foveation | 5.7 | 4.0 | 57 (spv left) |
11 | Nil | Bidirectional jerk | 5.0 | 4.0 | 80 (spv left) |
| | | | | 33 (spv right) |
12 | Nil | Alternating direction right | 0–2 | 0–4.0 | 4 (spv left) |
| | Alternating direction left | 1.3–4 | 0–4.0 | 20 (spv right) |
13 | 10–15° Left | Alternating direction right | 5.0 | 4.0 | 50 (spv left) |
| | Alternating direction left | 4.0 | 4.0 | 69 (spv right) |
14 | Nil | Right jerk; elongated foveation | 5.0 | 3.0 | 68 (spv left) |
16 | Nil | Alternating direction right | 1.2 | 3.0 | 28 (spv left) |
| | Alternating direction left | 1.1 | 3.0 | 11 (spv right) |
Abadi RV, Pascal E. Periodic alternating nystagmus in humans with albinism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
. 1994;35:4080–4086.
[PubMed]Bedell HE, Bollenbacher MA. Perception of motion smear in normal observers and in persons with congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
. 1996;37:188–195.
[PubMed]Bedell HE. Sensitivity to oscillatory target motion in congenital nystagmus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
. 1992;33:1811–1821.
[PubMed]Dell’Osso LF, Leigh RJ. Ocular motor stability of foveation periods. Neuro-ophthalmol
. 1992;12:303–326.
[CrossRef] Davis DG, Smith JL. Periodic alternating nystagmus. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1971;72:757–762.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Daroff RB, Dell’Osso LF. Periodic alternating nystagmus and the shifting null. Can J Otolaryngol. 1974;3:367–371.
Baloh RW, Honrubia V, Konad HR. Periodic alternating nystagmus. Brain
. 1976;99:11–26.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Gradstein L, Reinecke RD, Wizov SS, Goldstein HP. Congenital periodic alternating nystagmus: diagnosis and management. Ophthalmology
. 1997;104:918–929.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Kestenbaum A.
Nouvelle opération du nystagmus Bull Soc
Ophthalmol Fr. 1953;6:599–602. A nystagmus operation. Acta
XVII Concilium Ophthalmologium. 1954;2:1071–1078.
Anderson JR. Causes and treatment of congenital eccentric nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol
. 1953;37:267–281.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Collewijn H, Apkarian P, Spekreijse H. The oculomotor behavior of human albinos. Brain
. 1985;108:1–28.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]St John R, Fisk JD, Timney B, Goodale MA. Eye movements of human albinos. Am J Optom Physiol Opt
. 1984;61:377–385.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]von Noorden GK, Sprunger DT. Large rectus muscle recessions for the treatment of congenital nystagmus. Arch Ophthalmol
. 1991;109:221–224.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Dell’Osso LF, Hertle RW, Williams RW, Jacobs JB. A new surgery for congenital nystagmus: effects of tenotomy on an achiasmatic canine and the role of extraocular proprioception. J Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus
. 1999;3:166–182.
[CrossRef]