Abstract
purpose. To characterize the clinical features of 14 Japanese patients with
autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP) who were found to have a
mutation in the FSCN2 gene.
methods. Mutation screening by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)
was performed in 120 unrelated patients with ADRP, 200 unrelated
patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (ARRP), and 100
patients with simplex RP (SRP). The DNA fragment that showed abnormal
mobility on SSCP was sequenced. The clinical features of these patients
were determined by visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy,
electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, and kinetic visual field
testing.
results. A novel 208delG mutation in the FSCN2 gene was
identified in 14 patients from four unrelated families with ADRP. The
ophthalmic findings were typical of RP.
conclusions. The findings show that a 208delG mutation in the FSCN2 gene produces ADRP. This mutation was found in 3.3% of the patients
with ADRP in Japan, which suggests that it may be relatively common in
Japanese patients with ADRP.
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a retinal disease that can
have a dominant, a recessive, or an X-linked inheritance pattern.
Genetic analyses of patients with RP have shown that approximately 30%
of the patients with autosomal dominant RP (ADRP) have mutations of the
rhodopsin gene or mutations in the
RP1 gene. Among these
mutations, the Pro23His mutation in the rhodopsin gene accounts for
12% of cases of ADRP.
1 These percentages were determined
in patients in the United States, but in Japan, only five mutations in
the rhodopsin gene (Gly106Arg, Asn15Ser, Glu181Lys, Thr17Met, and
Pro347Leu) and no
RP1 mutations have been
reported.
2 3 4 5 6 7 Our results from screening of the rhodopsin
gene showed that no other mutation of the rhodopsin gene is present in
99% of Japanese patients with ADRP. Although 10 loci for ADRP, 1q, 3q,
6p, 7p, 7q, 8q, 14q, 17p, 17q, and 19q, have been reported, only four
genes, the rhodopsin, peripherin/
RDS,
NRL, and
RP1 genes, were identified. These findings strongly suggest
that some other photoreceptor-specific gene may be the cause of RP in
the Japanese population.
The retinal fascin gene (
FSCN2) is a newly identified
photoreceptor-specific gene located on chromosome 17q25, which encodes
516 amino acids.
8 9 The fascin gene is associated with the
assemblage of the actin-based structures of the connecting cilium
plasma membrane and plays an important role in photoreceptor disc
formation.
8 9 10 11 To date, only five polymorphic mutations
in the
FSCN2 gene have been reported,
9 and
a disease-causing mutation in the
FSCN2 gene has not been
published.
We report the presence of a 208delG mutation of the fascin gene in four
unrelated Japanese families with ADRP and describe the clinical
features of these patients.
We screened genomic DNA samples isolated from 120 unrelated
patients with ADRP, 200 unrelated patients with autosomal recessive
retinitis pigmentosa (ARRP), and 100 patients with simplex RP (SRP) for
mutations of the FSCN2 gene. We further screened 200 control
chromosomes for mutations of this gene.
Genomic DNA was isolated from leukocytes prepared from a sample of each
patient’s blood (10–15 ml), by using a protocol previously described
in detail.
2 For the screenings, nine sets of
oligonucleotide primer pairs were used from the genomic sequence of
FSCN2. The primer sequences are given in
Table 1 . PCR was performed in 50 μl of reaction mixture containing 250 ng
genomic DNA, 20 μM of each primer, 200 μM of each dNTP, and 1.25 U
Taq polymerase. The buffer contained 50 mM KCl, 10 mM TrisCl
(pH 8.3), and 1.5 mM MgCl
2.
The following steps were used for the PCR: an initial denaturation for
2 minutes at 94°C; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute;
annealing at the exon-specific temperature for 1 minute; extension at
72°C for 2 minutes; and a final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes.
Products of the PCR were analyzed by nonradioisotopic single-strand
conformation polymorphism (SSCP).
The amplified DNA fragment was then electrophoresed in 8%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 10% glycerol at 20 W for 8
hours at room temperature. After electrophoresis, DNA bands were
visualized by silver staining. The mutation or polymorphism was
observed by the presence of abnormal bands derived from a mutant
allele. The DNA fragment that showed abnormal mobility on SSCP was then
directly sequenced to identify the mutation in the FSCN2 gene on a sequencer (model 310; Perkin Elmer-Applied Biosystems, Foster
City, CA). The product of the PCR amplification in exons 1d, 2, 3, and
5 were directly sequenced without SSCP. The PCR products were sequenced
in the forward and reverse directions.
The tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki were followed, and informed
consent was obtained from all subjects who participated in the study.
The clinical characteristics of the 14 patients from four families
associated with the 208delG mutation are summarized in
Tables 2 and 3 . All the affected patients had had night blindness from childhood. The
visual acuity of patients with 208delG mutation ranged from hand motion
to 1.0 in all four families. Patients more than 40 years of age showed
a marked decrease of the visual fields and visual acuity.
In 11 patients, fundus examination disclosed bilateral pigmentary
retinal degeneration and severe attenuation of the retinal arteries.
Patient II-2 of family 4 showed pigmentary retinal degeneration
associated with atrophic macular degeneration, and patient III-1 of the
same family showed only attenuation of retinal vessels and a mottled
appearance of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). The fundus of two
patients (patient III-1 of family 2 and patient IV-1 of family 4), who
were 10 and 4 years old, respectively, showed a mottled appearance of
the RPE, attenuation of the retinal vessels, and absence of retinal
pigmentary changes
(Fig. 3) . These findings showed the early stage of retinal degeneration with
the 208delG mutation. The natural course of the fundus changes can be
estimated by examining the fundus of three members of family 2 whose
ages extended over three generations
(Fig. 3) .
In six patients, Goldmann kinetic visual field testing showed severely
constricted central visual fields with the V-4-e target, or in other
cases, the patients could not even see the V-4-e target. Goldmann
kinetic visual field testing of patient III-1 of family 4, whose only
retinal abnormality was attenuation of the retinal vessels and mottled
appearance of the RPE, demonstrated a constricted visual field for the
I-4-e and I-2-e targets. Patient III-1 of family 2 showed constricted
visual fields for the I-4-e, I-3-e, and I-2-e targets.
FA disclosed hyperfluorescence from the posterior pole to the
peripheral retina that corresponded with the mottled retina, suggesting
atrophic changes in the RPE layer. Three patients (patients III-1 and
III-3 of family 1 and patient II-2 of family 2) showed a combination of
diffuse hyperfluorescence and patchy hypofluorescence. In addition,
cystoid macula edema was observed in patient III-2 of family 3, and
sharply demarcated macular degeneration was observed in patient II-2 of
family 4.
The results of the ERG recordings are presented in
Table 3 , and those
for the three members of family 2 are shown in
Figure 4 . The scotopic, single-flash, standard-flash ERGs and 30-Hz flicker ERG
were mildly reduced in patients III-1 of family 2 and III-1 of family
4, and the single-flash a- and b-waves of the ERGs were mildly reduced
in patient IV-1 of family 4. The ERGs of the other patients were
nonrecordable
(Table 3) .
Fascin is a member of the family of actin-binding proteins. Five
fascin genes from distant species, (i.e., urchin,
Drosophila,
Xenopus, mouse, and human) and two
retinal fascins (human and bovine) have been
identified.
8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 They are highly conserved,
actin-binding proteins, which supports the idea that fascin is a very
important protein across species. Relevant to our study, the retinal
fascin gene (
FSCN2) is a newly identified
photoreceptor-specific gene that encodes 516 amino acids and is located
on chromosome 17q25.
9 Biochemical and morphologic studies
have shown that retinal fascin also has actin-bundling
activity.
11 Retinal fascin is associated with the
assemblage of the actin-based structures of the connecting cilium
plasma membrane, which contains a cluster of F-actin and plays an
important role in photoreceptor disc formation.
9 10 11 It is
thus reasonable that mutations of the
FSCN2 gene could alter
the actin-binding and actin-bundling activities of the photoreceptor
cells and lead to retinal dystrophies.
RP17 is a novel locus for ADRP detected in two South African
families.
8 19 20 Because the
FSCN2 gene is
located on 17q25,
RP17 was considered to be a candidate gene
for RP type 17 (
RP17). However, Tubb et al.
9 reported that only five polymorphic mutations in the
FSCN2 gene were found in two large
RP17-carrying families, and no
previous report of a disease-causing mutation in the
FSCN2 gene had been published.
We evaluated 120 Japanese patients with ADRP, 200 patients with ARRP,
and 100 patients with SRP. Of note, molecular genetic analysis
disclosed that 14 patients from four unrelated families had an
identical 208delG mutation in the FSCN2 gene and that no
mutation was detected in the patients with ARRP and SRP.
This mutation resulted in a frame shift and a premature termination at
codon 144, 359 bp downstream from the deletion. If translated, the
mutated FSCN2 gene would not encode a functional protein.
Fundus examination of three generations of family 2 disclosed the
progression of retinal degeneration with increasing age
(Fig. 3) . In
the early stage, a 10-year-old patient showed a mottled appearance of
the RPE and attenuation of the retinal vessels. In all families,
affected individuals more than 40 years old showed marked retinal
degeneration.
For human fascin, Ser39 is very important in regulating actin binding,
and this residue is also conserved in human retinal
fascin.
11 Thus, Ser39 is thought to play an important
role, not only in human fascin but also in human retinal fascin.
Because the 208delG mutation causes a frame shift and premature
termination, patients with this mutation do not have Ser39 in the
FSCN2 gene. Thus, these patients would be expected to lose
the activity of actin binding and have a disorder of photoreceptor
formation.
We hypothesize that the 208delG mutation in the
FSCN2 gene
may be relatively common in Japanese patients with ADRP, because we
have found this mutation in 3.3% of unrelated patients with ADRP in
Japan, and there have been no reports about pathogenic mutations in the
FSCN2 gene in RP type 17 of two families in other
countries.
8 19 20 Additional families with ADRP, ARRP, and
other retinal degenerations are being screened for this mutation to
ascertain the phenotype–genotype correlation in the
FSCN2 gene in the Japanese population.
Supported in part by a grant from the Research Committee on
Chorioretinal Degenerations and Optic Atrophy, the Ministry of Health,
Labour and Welfare of the Japanese Government, Tokyo, Japan (MT); and
Grants-in-Aid A-2-10307041 and 12357010 for Scientific Research from
the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of the Japanese
Government, Tokyo, Japan (MT).
Submitted for publication October 10, 2000; revised March 13, 2001;
accepted April 6, 2001.
Commercial relationships policy: N.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
charge payment. This article must therefore be marked“
advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734
solely to indicate this fact.
Corresponding author: Yuko Wada, Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku
University School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai
980-77, Japan.
yukow@oph.med.tohoku.ac.jp
Table 1. FSCN2 Gene Primers Used for Mutation Screening
Table 1. FSCN2 Gene Primers Used for Mutation Screening
EXON | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer | Length | Annealing Temperature |
1a | 5′-GGCCAGCCTGAAGATGCC-3′ | 5′-CTCTTCTGCCGACAGGTAGC-3′ | 232 bp | 61 |
1b | 5′-TCCGCAGCAGCCACCT-3′ | 5′-TCGGTGCCTCCGAAGA-3′ | 166 bp | 63 |
1c | 5′-TCTTCGGAGGCACCGA-3′ | 5′-AGGACTTGAGGCAGTACCGT-3′ | 237 bp | 62 |
1d | 5′-GCAGACGGAGACAAGCC-3′ | 5′-TCAGGAGGTCGCCACCT-3′ | 370 bp | 62 |
2 | 5′-GGTCTCTGAGAGGTGCCTTC-3′ | 5′-GCACTCACACTTGTGTGGCT-3′ | 317 bp | 60 |
3 | 5′-GATTGCCGTAGCAGCTCAGT-3′ | 5′-TCCAGCTCTTGGTGGAGATG-3′ | 398 bp | 62 |
4a | 5′-CACATGAGGCAATGGCA-3′ | 5′-CAGGTGGAAGACGTCGTAGA-3′ | 263 bp | 62 |
4b | 5′-AACCAGCTGGACACCAA-3′ | 5′-ACTCGAAGACGAAGTCCTCG-3′ | 245 bp | 63 |
5 | 5′-TACCGGATCCGAGGTGCG-3′ | 5′-CCTCCACCTCCAGCTGCAG-3′ | 408 bp | 63 |
Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with the 208delG Mutation in the FSCN2 Gene
Table 2. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with the 208delG Mutation in the FSCN2 Gene
Patient/Age (y) | Visual Acuity | Manifest Refraction | Goldmann Perimetry Results | Fundus Findings | Fluorescein Angiography |
Family 1 | | | | | |
II-4/81 | 0.1 OD | Pseudophakia | No data | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | No data |
| 0.1 OS | Pseudophakia | | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | |
III-1/51 | HM OD | Pseudophakia | NS | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | DHyperF, patchyHypoF |
| 0.01 OS | Pseudophakia | 0.003 (V4e) | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | |
III-3/57 | HM OD | Pseudophakia | NS | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | DHyperF, patchyHypoF |
| 0.01 OS | Pseudophakia | 0.019 (V4e) | BP, AN, atrophy | |
III-5/49 | 0.5 OD | −1.0 sphere | No data | BP, AN, atrophy | No data |
| 0.5 OS | −0.5 sphere | | BP, AN, atrophy | |
Family 2 | | | | | |
I-2/73 | 0.15 OD | −8.0+ 1.0× 58 | 0.025 (V4e) | BP, AN, atrophy | No data |
| HM OS | −9.0+ 1.0× 153 | NS | BP, AN, atrophy | |
II-2/40 | HM OD | −1.5+ 1.25× 97 | NS | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | DHyperF, patchy HypoF |
| HM OS | −1.0 sphere | NS | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | |
III-1/10 | 0.04 OD | −13.0+ 3.0× 90 | 3.326 (V4e), 1.361 (I4e), 0.041 (I3e) | AN, mottled RPE | DHyperF |
| 0.8 OS | −8.25+ 1.25× 120 | 3.42 (V4e), 1.768 (I4e), 0.702 (I3e), 0.087 (I2e) | AN, mottled RPE | |
Family 3 | | | | | |
I-2/74 | HM OD | Pseudophakia | NS | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | No data |
| HM OS | Pseudophakia | NS | BP, AN, atrophy, OA | |
II-1/52 | 0.2 OD | Pseudophakia | 0.049 (V4e) | BP, AN, atrophy | DHyperF |
| 0.4 OS | Pseudophakia | 0.047 (V4e) | BP, AN, atrophy | |
III-2/29 | 1.0 OD | −1.25+ 0.75× 110 | 0.262 (V4e), 0.046 (I4e), 0.009 (I2e) | BP, AN, atrophy | DHyperF, CME |
| 0.5 OS | −2.0 sphere | 0.143 (V4e), 0.031 (I4e), 0.001 (I2e) | BP, AN, atrophy, ME | |
Family 4 | | | | | |
II-2/70 | HM OD | Pseudophakia | 0.234 (V4e) | BP, AN, atrophy, CRA in MA | DHyperF, sharply demarcated CRA |
| HM OS | Pseudophakia | 0.074 (V4e) | BP, AN, atrophy, CRA in MA | |
II-3/68 | HM OD | Pseudophakia | No data | BP, AN, atrophy | No data |
| HM OS | Pseudophakia | No data | BP, AN, atrophy | |
III-1/32 | 1.0 OD | −3.5+ 1.0× 30 | 3.271 (V4e), 1.986 (I4e), 0.073 (I2e) | AN, mottled RPE | No data |
| 1.0 OS | −3.0 sphere | 2.592 (V4e), 1.437 (I4e), 0.037 (I2e) | AN, mottled RPE | |
IV-1/3 | 0.2 OD | −6.5+ 1.5× 100 | No data | AN, mottled RPE | No data |
| 0.4 OS | −6.0+ 1.5× 90 | No data | AN, mottled RPE | |
Patient | Standard-Flash | | | | Scotopic | | Photopic | | | | 30-Hz Flicker | |
| OD | | OS | | OD | OS | OD | | OS | | OD | OS |
| a Wave | b Wave | a Wave | b Wave | a Wave | b Wave | a Wave | b Wave | a Wave | b Wave | | |
Family 1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
II-4 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | NP | | NP | | NP | | NP | NP |
III-1 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | NP | | NP | | NP | | NP | NP |
III-3 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | NP | | NP | | NP | | NP | NP |
III-5 | NP | | NP | | NP | | NP | | NP | | NP | NP |
Family 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
I-2 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | |
II-2 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | |
III-1 | 29.9 | 29 | 43.2 | 40.2 | 21.7 | 40.7 | 43.7 | 45.3 | 77 | 68 | 32.2 | 34.7 |
Family 3 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
I-2 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | |
II-1 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | |
III-2 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | |
Family 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
II-2 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | |
II-3 | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | | Nonrecordable | |
III-1 | 73.6 | 61.4 | 76.5 | 69.3 | Normal | Normal | 97.5 | 80.3 | 77.6 | 77.9 | 55.1 | 60.2 |
IV-1 | 46.5 | 55.7 | 43.2 | 64.2 | NP | | NP | | NP | | NP | |
van Soest S, Westerveld A, de Jong PT, Bleeker-Wagemakers EM, Bergen AA. Retinitis pigmentosa: defined from a molecular point of view. Surv Ophthalmol
. 1999;43:321–334.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Nakazawa M, Kikawa-Araki E, Shiono T, Tamai M. Analysis of rhodopsin gene in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. Jpn J Ophthalmol
. 1991;35:386–393.
[PubMed]Budu Matsumoto M, Hayasaka S, Yamada T, Hayasaka Y. Rhodopsin gene codon 106 mutation (Gly-to-Arg) in a Japanese family with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Jpn J Ophthalmol
. 2000;44:610–614.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Yoshii M, Murakami A, Akeo K, et al. Visual function in retinitis pigmentosa related to a codon 15 rhodopsin gene mutation. Ophthalmic Res
. 1998;30:1–10.
[PubMed]Fujiki K, Hotta Y, Murakami A, et al. Missense mutation of rhodopsin gene codon 15 found in Japanese autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Jpn J Hum Genet
. 1995;40:271–277.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Saga M, Mashima Y, Akeo K, Oguchi Y, Kudoh J, Shimizu N. Autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa: a mutation in codon 181 (Glu→Lys) of the rhodopsin gene in a Japanese family. Ophthalmic Genet
. 1994;15:61–67.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Hayakawa M, Hotta Y, Imai Y, et al. Clinical features of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa with rhodopsin gene codon 17 mutation and retinal neovascularization in a Japanese patient. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1993;115:168–173.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Bardien-Kruger S, Greenberg J, Tubb B, et al. Refinement of the RP17 locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, construction of a YAC contig and investigation of the candidate gene retinal fascin. Eur J Hum Genet
. 1999;7:332–338.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Tubb BE, Bardien-Kruger S, Kashork CD, et al. Characterization of human retinal fascin gene (FSCN2) at 17q25: close physical linkage of fascin and cytoplasmic actin genes. Genomics
. 2000;65:146–156.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Saishin Y, Shimada S, Morimura H, et al. Isolation of a cDNA encoding a photoreceptor cell-specific actin-bundling protein: retinal fascin. FEBS Lett
. 1997;414:381–386.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Saishin Y, Ishikawa R, Ugawa S, et al. Retinal fascin: functional nature, subcellular distribution, and chromosomal localization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
. 2000;41:2087–2095.
[PubMed]Welber RG, Tobler WR. Computerized quantitative analysis of kinetic visual field. Am J Ophthalmol
. 1986;101:461–468.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Marmor MF, Arden GB, Nilson SEG, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography. Arch Ophthalmol
. 1989;107:816–819.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Bryan J, Edwards R, Matsudaira P, Otto J, Wulfkuhle J. Fascin, an echinoid actin-bundling protein, is a homolog of the Drosophila singed gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
. 1993;90:9115–9119.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Paterson J, O’Hare K. Structure and transcription of the singed locus of
Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics
. 1991;129:1073–1084.
[PubMed]Duh FM, Latif F, Weng Y, et al. cDNA cloning and expression of the human homolog of the sea urchin fascin and Drosophila singed genes which encodes an actin-bundling protein. DNA Cell Biol
. 1994;13:821–827.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Edwards RA, Bryan J. Fascins, a family of actin bundling proteins. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton
. 1995;32:1–9.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Edwards RA, Herrera-Sosa H, Otto J, Bryan J. Cloning and expression of a murine fascin homolog from mouse brain. J Biol Chem
. 1995;270:10764–10770.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Bardien S, Ramesar R, Bhattacharya S, Greenberg J. Retinitis pigmentosa locus on 17q (RP17): fine localization to 17q22 and exclusion of the PDEG and TIMP2 genes. Hum Genet
. 1997;101:13–17.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]Bardien S, Ebenezer N, Greenberg J, et al. An eighth locus for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa is linked to chromosome 17q. Hum Mol Genet
. 1995;4:1459–1462.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]