The present results indicate that exposure of human sclera to
latanoprost acid increased FGF-2 permeation in a dose-dependent manner.
This may reflect a general enhancement of scleral permeability, because
it paralleled increased scleral permeation by10-kDa
tetramethylrhodamine-dextran. There was no significant relationship
between age, race, and scleral permeability coefficient.
There was a linear increase of the concentration of FGF-2 over 120
minutes in the uveal-side Ussing chamber
(Fig. 1) . This indicated that
FGF-2 can pass through the human sclera with a constant rate in vitro
and suggests that its movement reflects molecular
diffusion.
31 The permeation rate of FGF-2 was
approximately 90 times lower than that of 10-kDa dextran. The greater
permeation rate of 10-kDa dextran may be related to binding of FGF-2 to
molecules within the sclera. These molecules include collagen types I,
III, V, VI, and VIII and the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) chondroitin
sulfate, dermatan sulfate, keratan sulfate, heparan sulfate, and
hyaluronan.
32 33 Much of the chondroitin sulfate, dermatan
sulfate, and keratan sulfate may be covalently linked to the
proteoglycans decorin, biglycan, and aggrecan.
32 Immunoreactivity of each of these proteoglycans is distributed
throughout the thickness of sclera. It is well established that FGF-2
strongly binds to heparan sulfate
(
K d = 0.34μ
M).
34 Recently, it has been shown that FGF-2 also can
bind to dermatan sulfate (
K d = 2.5μ
M).
35 Because each of these GAGs is present within
sclera, it is possible that binding of FGF-2 to these extracellular
matrix components could impede the movement of FGF-2 through the
sclera.
Another possible explanation of the substantially lesser permeation
rate of FGF-2 may be due to the formation of multimers. The molecular
radius of 16-kDa FGF-2 monomer has been determined to be 3 nm and is
almost the same as that of 10-kDa
tetramethylrhodamine-dextran.
36 However FGF-2 readily
forms dimers in solution and can be multimerized by oxidation. In
pentamers, the molecular radius of FGF-2 can be 6 nm larger than the
dimer (13 nm). The permeation rate of 70-kDa
tetramethylrhodamine-dextran, whose molecular radius is 6.4 nm, similar
to FGF-2, was 20-fold less than that of 10-kDa dextran,
14 and four times higher than FGF-2. Hence, the permeation rates of
bioactive proteins such as FGF-2 may depend on molecular weight and
molecular radius, including the formation of multimers, and may be
modulated by binding and degradation in vital tissues.
Increased transscleral permeation by FGF-2 after PG treatments suggests
that cotreatment with PGs may facilitate the use of FGF-2 to enhance
survival of retinal neurons in glaucoma and other eye diseases.
Previous studies have shown that FGF-2 can promote neuronal survival in
vitro and in vivo.
37 38 Beneficial effects were observed
with concentrations as low as 20 pg/ml. Moreover, intraventricular
infusion of FGF-2 can promote neuronal survival after experimental
axotomy, ischemia, neurotoxin treatment, or contusion of brain or
spinal cord tissue.
39 40 41
It should be noted that infusion of FGF-2 may stimulate responses in
many other tissues, besides neural tissues, that may be either
beneficial or detrimental to the desired neural tissue response. There
also may be specific requirements for additional factors in the case of
retinal ganglion cells.
42 Except in retina and neural
tissues, FGF receptors are present in cornea, trabecular meshwork, lens
epithelial cell, vitreous fluid, vascular endothelial cells, and the
membrane of eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy or diabetic
retinopathy.
43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Therefore, enhanced transscleral
delivery of FGF-2 may influence a number of ocular tissues. Other
receptors for growth factors and neurotrophic factors also are
expressed in non-neural posterior pole tissues. Thus
, realizing the benefits of increased transscleral permeability may
require simultaneous suppression of undesired side
effects.
50
After exposure of sclera to PGs, there is evidence of biochemical
changes within the sclera, including increased MMPs and reduced
collagens.
12 14 However, laboratory studies
12 and clinical trials
51 have not revealed any morphologic or
functional changes in sclera. Although there was reduced collagen in
the sclera of monkey eyes receiving topical
PGF
2α-IE, for example, there was no significant
change in the structural organization of the sclera or associated
structures.
12 Moreover, neither topical application of
latanoprost nor subconjunctival injection of latanoprost acid altered
the progression of form-deprivation myopia in chicks.
52 This suggests that endogenous control of scleral growth is not altered
by FP-receptor activation. These findings collectively suggest that
long-term clinical use of latanoprost is not detrimental to the sclera.
In conclusion, the increase in the permeation rate of FGF-2 across the
sclera after exposure to latanoprost suggests that latanoprost
cotreatment may facilitate delivery of FGF-2 to posterior pole tissues.
Because this study evaluated organ-cultured sclera, in vivo studies
should be undertaken to confirm the response. This response may be
particularly useful for drug delivery to the choroid and optic nerve,
because the barrier for macromolecule diffusion between these tissue
compartments is minimal.
53 54 It also may facilitate
delivery of FGF-2 to the retina, especially if permeability of the
blood–retinal barrier can be concomitantly increased by opening
retinal pigment epithelium tight junctions. A prolonged increase in
blood–retinal barrier permeability may lead to certain adverse
effects, however. If this occurs, the adverse effects would have to be
weighed against the potential benefits of FGF-2 delivery to the retina.
Limiting the duration of opening of the blood–retinal barrier might be
one approach to avoiding such adverse effects. Finally, in addition,
cotreatment with latanoprost or other similar prostaglandin analogues
may facilitate the transscleral delivery to the posterior segment of
other peptide growth factors or macromolecules in addition to FGF-2.
The authors thank the San Diego Eye Bank for providing the human
donor eyes studied in this investigation. This work was prepared in
partial fulfillment of the requirements for membership for Robert N.
Weinreb in the American Ophthalmological Society.