March 2002
Volume 43, Issue 3
Free
Physiology and Pharmacology  |   March 2002
Induction of xCT Gene Expression and L-Cystine Transport Activity by Diethyl Maleate at the Inner Blood–Retinal Barrier
Author Affiliations
  • Masatoshi Tomi
    From the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama, Japan; and the
    Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST); the
    Department of Molecular Biopharmacy and Genetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; and the
  • Ken-ichi Hosoya
    From the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Toyama, Japan; and the
    Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST); the
  • Hitomi Takanaga
    Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST); the
    Department of Molecular Biopharmacy and Genetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; and the
    New Industry Creation Hatchery Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
  • Sumio Ohtsuki
    Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST); the
    Department of Molecular Biopharmacy and Genetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; and the
    New Industry Creation Hatchery Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
  • Tetsuya Terasaki
    Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST); the
    Department of Molecular Biopharmacy and Genetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan; and the
    New Industry Creation Hatchery Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2002, Vol.43, 774-779. doi:
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Masatoshi Tomi, Ken-ichi Hosoya, Hitomi Takanaga, Sumio Ohtsuki, Tetsuya Terasaki; Induction of xCT Gene Expression and L-Cystine Transport Activity by Diethyl Maleate at the Inner Blood–Retinal Barrier. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002;43(3):774-779.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

purpose. In this study, the expression and regulation of the L-cystine transporter, system xc , at the inner blood–retinal barrier (inner BRB) was investigated using a conditionally immortalized rat retinal capillary endothelial cell line (TR-iBRB2) as an in vitro model.

methods. For the uptake study, TR-iBRB2 cells were cultured at 33°C in the presence or absence of diethyl maleate (DEM), and the uptake rate of[ 14C]L-cystine was measured at 37°C. The mRNA levels of system xc , which consists of xCT and 4F2hc, were determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis with specific primers.

results. The xCT and 4F2hc mRNAs were expressed in TR-iBRB2 cells. The[ 14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells appeared to be mediated through a saturable Na+-independent process. The corresponding Michaelis-Menten constant was 9.18 μM. At 100 μM DEM, the xCT mRNA level and L-cystine uptake activity in TR-iBRB2 cells were enhanced in a time-dependent manner. Concomitantly, the glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells was increased. In contrast, the 4F2hc mRNA level was unchanged up to 24 hours and was induced for more than 24 hours by DEM treatment. Under both normal and DEM treatment conditions, the uptake of[ 14C]L-cystine was strongly inhibited by L-glutamic acid, L-α-aminoadipic acid, L-homocysteic acid, and L-quisqualic acid, whereas L-aspartic acid and L-arginine had no effect, which is evidence of the induction of system xc .

conclusions. System xc -mediated L-cystine uptake appears to be present at the inner BRB. DEM induces L-cystine transport through system xc at the inner BRB by enhanced transcription of the xCT gene.

The retina is unique among body tissues, because it is the only tissue in which light is focused on a group of cells. It is necessary to protect the retina against oxidative stress, because light causes free radical oxidation. 1 Glutathione plays a key role in protecting cells against free radicals, peroxides, and other toxic compounds, and it is also important for protecting against the harmful effects of exposure to an oxidizing environment. 2 Glutathione also modulates synaptic transmission in the retina. 3 L-Cysteine (L-Cys) is one of the rate-limiting precursor amino acids for glutathione synthesis. 4 However, the concentration of L-Cys in the plasma (10–20 μM) is 10 times lower than that of L-Cystine (100–200 μM), because it is present as a dimer in plasma. 5 After L-cystine undergoes uptake into cells, it is rapidly reduced to L-Cys. 6 Under conditions of oxidative stress in the retina, therefore, it is necessary that it undergoes influx transport from the circulating blood to the retina across the blood–retinal barrier (BRB) to synthesize glutathione to protect the retina. 
L-Cystine and L-glutamic acid (L-Glu ) exchange transporter, referred to as system xc , is composed of the heavy chain of 4F2 cell-surface antigen (4F2hc/CD98) and xCT protein. 7 8 9 The physiological flux through system xc involves the entry of L-cystine and the exit of L-Glu. In addition, system xc is induced after an 8-hour culture with 100 μM diethyl maleate (DEM) and/or 1 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide. 7 DEM is often used as a reagent to deplete intracellular glutathione to induce oxidative stress, because it is relatively less toxic than some other electrophilic agents. 7 9 10 By means of in vivo integration plot analysis, we recently showed that L-cystine uptake in eye and brain is activated after a 12-hour DEM infusion from the external carotid artery, and this enhanced uptake is inhibited in the presence of L-Glu and L-α-aminoadipic acid (L-AAA), substrates for system xc . This suggests that L-cystine influx transport through system xc is activated by DEM at the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and BRB in vivo. 11  
The BRB, which is composed of retinal capillary endothelial cells (inner BRB) and retinal pigmented epithelial cells (outer BRB), may play a key role in influx and efflux transport from the circulating blood to the retina. 12 Very recently, Bridges et al. 8 reported that xCT and 4F2hc were expressed in a cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cell line, and xCT mRNA was induced by a nitric oxide donor, 3-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine. This induction appeared to act as an antioxidant protection mechanism. 8 The glutathione transporter (RcGshT) is also expressed in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. 13 However, our knowledge of the L-cystine transport mechanism and regulation of L-cystine transporter at the inner BRB is still incomplete. It is important to have more information about the L-cystine transport system at the inner BRB under normal and oxidative stress conditions, because the inner two thirds of the human retina is nourished by a direct blood supply through the inner BRB. 14  
We recently established conditionally immortalized rat retinal capillary endothelial cell lines (TR-iBRB) from a transgenic rat harboring temperature-sensitive simian virus (SV)40 large T-antigen gene. 15 TR-iBRB cells possess endothelial markers and express d-glucose transporter (GLUT1), efflux transporter (P-glycoprotein), 15 and monocarboxylate transporter-1 (MCT1), 16 which have been reported to be involved in the expression at the inner BRB, detected by immunohistochemical analysis. 17 18 19 Thus, TR-iBRB cells maintain certain in vivo transport functions and are a suitable in vitro model for the inner BRB. 20 The purpose of the present study was to investigate the L-cystine transport mechanism and the expression and regulation of system xc under normal and oxidative stress conditions, using TR-iBRB2 cells as an in vitro model of the inner BRB. 
Materials and Methods
Animals
Male Wistar rats, weighing 250 to 300 g, were purchased from Charles River (Yokohama, Japan). The investigations involving animals conformed to the provisions of the Animal Care Committee, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, and the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 
Cell Culture
TR-iBRB2 cells were established and characterized as described previously. 15 TR-iBRB2 cells were seeded onto rat tail collagen type I–coated tissue culture dishes (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Moregate, Bulimbra, Australia) and 15 μg/L endothelial cell growth factor (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) in the presence or absence of DEM (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan), which is a sulfhydryl-reactive agent, at 33°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and air. The permissive temperature for TR-iBRB2 cells to be cultured is 33°C, due to the presence of temperature-sensitive SV40 large T antigen. 
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
Total cellular RNA was prepared from phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)– washed cells using Trizol reagent (Gibco BRL, Rockville, MD). Single-strand cDNA was made from 1 μg total RNA by reverse transcription (RT) using oligo dT primer. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using a gene amplification system (GeneAmp PCR system 9700; PE-Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with xCT- or 4F2hc-specific primers through 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute, and 72°C for 1 minute (Table 1) . The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on an agarose gel in the presence of ethidium bromide and visualized using an imager (Epipro 7000; Aisin, Aichi, Japan). The PCR products of the expected length were cloned into a plasmid vector (p-GEM-T Easy Vector System I; Promega, Madison, WI) and amplified in Escherichia coli. Several clones were sequenced from both directions using a DNA sequencer (model 4200; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). 
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a sequence detector system (Prism 7700; PE-Applied Biosystems) with a kit (SYBR Green PCR Master Mix; PE-Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To quantify the amount of specific mRNA in the samples, a standard curve was generated for each run using the plasmid (pGEM-T Easy Vector; Promega) containing the gene of interest. This enabled standardization of the initial mRNA content of TR-iBRB2 cells relative to the amount of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The PCR was performed using xCT-, 4F2hc-, GLUT1-, or GAPDH-specific primers (Table 1) and the cycling parameters stated earlier. 
Determination of Intracellular Glutathione
Measurement of the total glutathione of PBS-washed cells using a kit (Bioxytech GSH-420, Oxis Research International, Portland, OR) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The method is based on the formation of a chromophoric thione. 21 Protein assay was performed with a kit (DC; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. 
[14C] L-Cystine Uptake
The L-[14C(U)]-cystine ([14C] L-cystine, 303 mCi/mmol; NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) uptake was measured according to the method in a previous report. 15 Cells (5 × 104 cells/cm2) were cultured at 33°C for 2 days on a rat tail collagen type I–coated 24-well plate (BD Biosciences) and washed with 1 mL extracellular fluid (ECF) buffer consisting of 122 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 3 mM KCl, 1.4 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 0.4 mM K2HPO4, 10 mM d-glucose, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) at 37°C. Uptake was initiated by applying 200 μL ECF buffer containing 0.1 μCi[ 14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) at 37°C in the presence or absence of inhibitors. Na+-free ECF buffers were prepared in two different ways: The choline ECF buffer was prepared by equimolar replacement of NaCl and NaHCO3 with choline chloride and choline bicarbonate, respectively. The Li ECF buffer was prepared by equimolar replacement of NaCl and NaHCO3 with LiCl and KHCO3, respectively. After a predetermined period, uptake was terminated by removing the solution, and cells were immersed in ice-cold ECF buffer. The cells were then solubilized in 750 μL 1% Triton X-100. An aliquot (15 μL) was taken for protein assay using the kit (Bio-Rad) with BSA as a standard. The remaining solution (500 μL) was mixed with a 5-mL scintillation cocktail (Hionic-fluor; Packard, Meriden, CT) for measurement of radioactivity in a liquid scintillation counter (LS6500; Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA). 
Data Analysis
For kinetic studies, the Michaelis-Menten constant (K m), maximum uptake rate (V max), and nonsaturable uptake rate constant (P non) of L-cystine uptake were calculated from equation 1 , using a nonlinear least-squares regression analysis on computer. 22  
\[V{=}V_{\mathrm{max}}{\times}C/(K_{\mathrm{m}}{+}C){+}P_{\mathrm{non}}{\times}C\]
where V and C are the uptake rate of L-cystine at 5 minutes and the concentration of L-cystine, respectively. To analyze the mechanism for the inhibition by L-Glu (300 μM) the inhibitory constant (K i) was calculated from equation 2 on computer. 22  
\[V{=}V_{\mathrm{max}}{\times}C/{[}K_{\mathrm{m}}{\times}(1{+}l/K_{\mathrm{i}}){+}C{]}\]
where I is the concentration of L-Glu. 
Unless otherwise indicated, all data represent the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance of differences among means of several groups was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a modified Fisher least-squares difference method. 
Results
Expression of xCT and 4F2hc mRNA in TR-iBRB2 cells
The expression of xCT and 4F2hc mRNA in TR-iBRB2 cells was analyzed by RT-PCR. The bands corresponding to the expected 182- and 141-bp for xCT and 4F2hc, respectively, were amplified from TR-iBRB2 cells, with rat brain as a positive control (Fig. 1A 1B) . 7 9 23 The DNA sequence of the bands of TR-iBRB2 cells was almost identical with that of mouse 7 and human 8 9 xCT, with a homology of 96.4% and 90.6%, respectively, and absolutely identical with rat 4F2hc, 24 with a homology of 100%. 
L-Cystine Uptake by TR-iBRB2 Cells through System xc
The time course of[ 14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells is shown in Figure 2 . [14C]L-Cystine uptake increased linearly for at least 30 minutes. The[ 14C]L-cystine uptake (cell-to-medium ratio) was 89.8 ± 5.1 μL/mg protein and 240 ± 6 μL/mg protein at 10 and 30 minutes, respectively. This supports an apparently concentrative behavior, because the[ 14C]L-cystine uptake was larger than the cell volume of approximately 3 μL/mg protein, estimated by 3-O-methyl-d-glucose uptake through facilitated d-glucose transporter, GLUT1, in TR-iBRB2 cells. 15  
Figure 3 shows the concentration-dependent uptake of L-cystine by TR-iBRB2 cells. In an analysis using an Eadie-Scatchard plot, the intracellular L-cystine uptake was found to consist of saturable and nonsaturable processes (Fig. 3 , inset). Nonlinear least-squares regression analysis revealed that the K m, V max, and P non were 9.18 ± 3.18 μM, 75.4 ± 10.8 pmol/(min · mg protein), and 0.410 ± 0.029μ L/(min · mg protein) (mean ± SD), respectively. 
The inhibitory effect of Na+-free conditions on[ 14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells was examined under two different sets of conditions. The choline ECF buffer reduced slightly the[ 14C]L-cystine uptake by 26.2% ± 2.7% (P > 0.05). Interaction between the organic cation, choline, and a tracer level of L-cystine may have occurred. Nevertheless, the Li ECF buffer had no effect on[ 14C]L-cystine uptake (104% ± 8%). This supports the evidence that[ 14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells takes place in an Na+-independent manner. 
The inhibition study was performed to characterize the[ 14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells under normal conditions (Table 2 , No pretreatment). [14C]L-Cystine uptake was inhibited by more than 80% by L-cystine, L-Glu, L-AAA, L-homocysteic acid (L-HCA), and L-quisqualic acid (L-QQA), all of which are substrates for system xc . 7 25 It was partly inhibited by d-cystine, d-glutamic acid (d-Glu), and L-lysine (L-Lys) by up to 48%, whereas L-aspartic acid (L-Asp), L-leucine (L-Leu), L-arginine (L-Arg), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and p-aminohippuric acid (PAH) had no effect on[ 14C]L-cystine uptake. Moreover, the Lineweaver-Burk plot showed that the two lines of the L-cystine uptake in the presence or absence of 300 μM L-Glu intersected on the ordinate. This indicates that L-Glu competitively inhibited L-cystine uptake with a K i of 142 ± 18 μM (mean ± SD; Fig. 4 ). 
Effect of DEM in TR-iBRB2 Cells
The effects of DEM treatment on mRNA expression,[ 14C]L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration were examined in TR-iBRB2 cells. Treatment with 100 μM DEM resulted in time-dependent induction of xCT mRNA up to 48 hours, whereas GLUT1, used as an unrelated transporter, did not change (Fig. 5A) , supporting the hypothesis that xCT mRNA is specifically induced by DEM treatment. Corresponding to xCT mRNA expression, the[ 14C]L-cystine uptake was enhanced up to 24 hours in a time-dependent manner and reached a plateau at more than 24 hours (Fig. 5B) . Moreover, the intracellular glutathione concentration was also increased in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 5B) . The xCT mRNA level, [14C]L-cystine uptake activity, and the glutathione concentration after 24 hours of 100 μM DEM treatment was 2.61-, 2.33-, and 1.43-fold greater than that of the control (at time 0), respectively. In contrast, the expression of 4F2hc mRNA was unchanged up to 24 hours and induced at 36 and 48 hours (Fig. 5A)
Figure 6 shows the effect of the DEM concentration (24-hour treatment) on the mRNA expression, [14C]L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. The expression of xCT mRNA was significantly induced at DEM concentrations of 100 to 300 μM, and the maximum induction took place at 200 μM (Fig. 6A) , whereas the [14C]L-cystine uptake was enhanced in a dose-dependent manner. At 100 to 200 μM DEM, the intracellular glutathione concentration was significantly increased, with maximum glutathione concentration occurring at 100 μM DEM (Fig. 6B) . In contrast, the expression of 4F2hc and GLUT1 mRNA was not significantly affected in the presence of 50 to 500 μM DEM (Fig. 6A)
An inhibition study was performed to characterize the[ 14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells after treatment with 100 μM DEM for 24 hours (Table 2 , DEM pretreatment). [14C]L-Cystine uptake was inhibited by more than 80% by L-cystine, L-Glu, L-AAA, L-HCA, and L-QQA, whereas L-Asp and L-Arg produced no inhibition. The manner of inhibition was identical with that of [14C]L-cystine uptake under normal conditions. 
Discussion
In the present study, TR-iBRB2 cells used as an in vitro model of the inner BRB expressed xCT and 4F2hc mRNA (Fig. 1) , and L-cystine uptake occurred in an Na+-independent and concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3) . The corresponding K m of 9.18 μM is 8.8-fold lower than that obtained for L-cystine uptake (K m = 81 μM), using mouse xCT and 4F2hc cRNA coinjected Xenopus laevis oocytes. 7 That there was no agreement of K m is probably because of a difference between species and/or the experimental systems. Nevertheless,[ 14C]L-cystine uptake was strongly inhibited by system xc substrates, such as L-Glu, L-AAA, L-HCA, and L-QQA (Table 2) . This manner of inhibition is consistent with system xc characteristics, as reported elsewhere. 7 25 System bo,+, which is also an Na+-independent transporter, mediates the transport of L-cystine, L-Leu, and basic amino acids. 26 [ 14C]L-Cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells excludes the involvement of system bo,+, because L-Leu, L-Arg, and L-Lys produced no marked inhibition (Table 2) . Moreover,[ 14C]L-cystine uptake was competitively inhibited by L-Glu with a K i of 142 μM (Fig. 4) , which is very close to the K m of L-Glu uptake (200 μM) by cultured human fibroblasts through system xc . 6 These results support the expression and function of system xc in TR-iBRB2 cells. 
Our previous in vivo study indicated that L-cystine uptake by the brain and eye after a 12-hour DEM infusion (7.5 μM) through the external carotid artery was significantly activated (1.6- and 1.2-fold, respectively), compared with a saline infusion. 11 In the presence of L-Glu and L-AAA, L-cystine uptake by the eye was inhibited more than it was enhanced by DEM treatment, but inhibition occurred at approximately 80% of the amount of enhanced uptake by DEM treatment in the brain, suggesting that system xc may act at the BRB, even under normal conditions and is induced under oxidative stress conditions after DEM treatment. 11 This interesting observation probably is accounted for by the fact that the retina is chronically exposed to light and light-induced free radical oxidation. 1 The present study demonstrated the induction and function of the L-cystine transporter at the inner BRB. In TR-iBRB2 cells, DEM at 100 μM induced xCT mRNA as well as L-cystine uptake in a time-dependent manner. This induction under oxidative stress is in good agreement with that in mouse macrophages, 7 a human retinal pigment epithelial cell line, 8 and human glioma cells. 9 The expression of xCT mRNA was induced by DEM and/or lipopolysaccharide, by 3-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine, and by DEM. 
The intracellular glutathione concentration was also increased in a time-dependent manner at 100 μM DEM (Fig. 5B) . This evidence supports the finding that activation of L-cystine uptake through system xc in TR-iBRB2 cells stimulates glutathione synthesis. However, DEM at more than 300 μM depleted intracellular glutathione (Fig. 6B) and injured cells, because the protein content per dish was reduced by 33% and 75% at 300 and 500 μM DEM compared with the control, respectively (data not shown). This is in good agreement with a previous result in human fibroblasts 10 and suggests that DEM acts in two different ways: as an inducer of xCT mRNA at 100 μM DEM and as a nonspecific deleterious agent at higher concentrations. Therefore, the xCT level declined at more than 300 μM DEM. However, it is not clear at present whether L-cystine uptake was increased up to 500 μM DEM. Further studies are needed to investigate the protein level of xCT expression. 
In contrast, the 4F2hc mRNA level did not change up to 24 hours at a DEM concentration of 0 to 500 μM (Figs. 5A 6A) , as was the case with the human retinal pigment epithelial cell line, 8 probably because the amount of 4F2hc mRNA was 56-fold greater than xCT mRNA, according to quantitative real-time PCR analysis under normal conditions (data not shown). Therefore, 4F2hc protein was large enough to bind to xCT protein, even though xCT mRNA was increased by 2.61-fold during the 24-hour DEM treatment. Moreover, 4F2hc protein is a component of several other amino acid transport systems, such as systems L and y+L. 27 However, the 4F2hc mRNA was increased for longer than the 24-hour DEM treatment (Fig. 5A) . One possibility is that other amino acid transporters are induced for more than 24 hours. The inner BRB may express system L because of the uptake of large neutral amino acids, as occurs in isolated bovine retinal capillary. 28 Taking all these results into consideration, we conclude that system xc is expressed in TR-iBRB2 cells and the induction of xCT, activation of L-cystine uptake, and enhancement of glutathione synthesis occur under 100-μM DEM treatment for 24 hours. 
A number of possible physiological roles for the induction of system xc include action as a detoxifying system in the retina and retinal capillary endothelial cells by supplying L-cystine/L-Cys for the synthesis of glutathione. Hyperglycemia is associated with an increased production of reactive oxygen species and accumulation of oxidative damage in various tissues. 29 30 Moreover, oxidative damage at the inner BRB and in the retina is thought to be involved in retinal diseases, such as diabetic retinopathy 31 and age-related macular degeneration. 32 In the retinal Müller cells,γ -glutamylcysteine synthetase subunit gene expression is induced under oxidative stress conditions, 33 suggesting that glutathione synthesis is enhanced under such conditions in the retina, and L-Cys is also required in the retina from the circulating blood for glutathione synthesis. This evidence from our current in vitro study and previous in vivo results 11 suggests that L-cystine undergoes influx transport from the circulating blood to the retina across the inner BRB under oxidative stress conditions after DEM treatment to protect the retina from oxidative damage. However, there remains the possibility that synthesized glutathione in retinal capillaries undergoes efflux to the retinal parenchymal cells. Müller cells are known to surround the retinal capillary, 17 and glutathione in the retina is mainly produced in Müller cells. 34 35  
In conclusion, the xCT mRNA level, L-cystine transport activity, and glutathione levels were enhanced under oxidative stress conditions after DEM treatment of TR-iBRB2 cells used as an in vitro model for the inner BRB, and L-cystine uptake into the eye was enhanced after a 12-hour DEM infusion in vivo. 11 These findings are an important contribution to a better understanding of the supply of L-cystine to the retina as well as to the retinal capillaries and of the detoxifying role of the inner BRB. 
 
Table 1.
 
Oligonucleotide Primers Used for PCR Amplification of cDNAs
Table 1.
 
Oligonucleotide Primers Used for PCR Amplification of cDNAs
Target mRNA Upstream Primer (5′ to 3′) Downstream Primer (5′ to 3′) Product Size (bp)
xCT CCTGGCATTTGGACGCTACAT TCAGAATTGCTGTGAGCTTGCA 182
4F2hc CTCCCAGGAAGATTTTAAAGACCTTCT TTCATTTTGGTGGCTACAATGTCAG 141
GLUT1 GATGATGAACCTGTTGGCCT AGCGGAACAGCTCCAAGATG 503
GAPDH TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTAGGCCAT 240
Figure 1.
 
RT-PCR analysis of xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B) in TR-iBRB2 cells. Lane 1: rat brain as a positive control in both xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B); lane 2: TR-iBRB2 cells; lane Image not available : in the absence of reverse transcriptase for TR-iBRB2 cells.
Figure 1.
 
RT-PCR analysis of xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B) in TR-iBRB2 cells. Lane 1: rat brain as a positive control in both xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B); lane 2: TR-iBRB2 cells; lane Image not available : in the absence of reverse transcriptase for TR-iBRB2 cells.
Figure 2.
 
Time course of [14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. [14C]L-Cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed at 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The SD bar is smaller than the size of the symbol.
Figure 2.
 
Time course of [14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. [14C]L-Cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed at 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The SD bar is smaller than the size of the symbol.
Figure 3.
 
Concentration-dependence of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. The [14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was determined at 5 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). Data were subjected to Michaelis-Menten and Eadie-Scatchard analyses (inset). The K m is 9.18 ± 3.18 μM, V max is 75.4 ± 10.8 pmol/(min · mg protein), and P non is 0.410 ± 0.029μ L/(min · mg protein) (mean ± SD).
Figure 3.
 
Concentration-dependence of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. The [14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was determined at 5 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). Data were subjected to Michaelis-Menten and Eadie-Scatchard analyses (inset). The K m is 9.18 ± 3.18 μM, V max is 75.4 ± 10.8 pmol/(min · mg protein), and P non is 0.410 ± 0.029μ L/(min · mg protein) (mean ± SD).
Table 2.
 
Effect of Several Inhibitors on[ 14C]l-cystine Uptake by TR-iBRB2 Cells
Table 2.
 
Effect of Several Inhibitors on[ 14C]l-cystine Uptake by TR-iBRB2 Cells
Inhibitors No Pretreatment DEM Pretreatment
No pretreatment control 100 ± 3
DEM pretreatment control 100 ± 4
1 mM L-Cystine 3.19 ± 0.23* 3.20 ± 0.04*
1 mM D-Cystine 51.9 ± 2.8* ND
2.5 mM L-Glutamic acid 9.67 ± 0.52* 19.3 ± 0.6*
2.5 mM D-Glutamic acid 73.0 ± 3.2, † ND
2.5 mM L-α-Aminoadipic acid 10.9 ± 0.6* 19.3 ± 0.6*
2.5 mM L-Homocysteic acid 7.62 ± 0.83* 6.12 ± 0.15*
2.5 mM L-Quisqualic acid 19.2 ± 0.6* 13.5 ± 0.4*
2.5 mM L-Aspartic acid 89.7 ± 2.8 86.7 ± 3.5
2.5 mM L-Leucine 83.0 ± 7.2 ND
2.5 mM L-Arginine 104 ± 7 101 ± 2
2.5 mM L-Lysine 76.5 ± 4.2, ‡ ND
2.5 mM γ-Aminobutyric acid 94.0 ± 2.4 ND
2.5 mM p-Aminohippuric acid 99.7 ± 1.1 ND
Figure 4.
 
Lineweaver-Burk plot of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells showing competitive inhibition by L-glutamic acid. The[ 14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed in the presence or absence of 300 μM L-glutamic acid at 10 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The K i for L-glutamic acid is 142 ± 18 μM (mean ± SD).
Figure 4.
 
Lineweaver-Burk plot of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells showing competitive inhibition by L-glutamic acid. The[ 14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed in the presence or absence of 300 μM L-glutamic acid at 10 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The K i for L-glutamic acid is 142 ± 18 μM (mean ± SD).
Figure 5.
 
Time-dependence of DEM treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (at time 0). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of[ 14C]L-cystine uptake; (○), intracellular glutathione concentration. The DEM concentration was 100μ M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (at time 0).
Figure 5.
 
Time-dependence of DEM treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (at time 0). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of[ 14C]L-cystine uptake; (○), intracellular glutathione concentration. The DEM concentration was 100μ M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (at time 0).
Figure 6.
 
Concentration-dependence of diethyl maleate (DEM) treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (no treatment). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of [14C]L-cystine uptake; (○) intracellular glutathione concentration. DEM treatment was applied for 24 hours. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3–6). * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (no treatment).
Figure 6.
 
Concentration-dependence of diethyl maleate (DEM) treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (no treatment). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of [14C]L-cystine uptake; (○) intracellular glutathione concentration. DEM treatment was applied for 24 hours. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3–6). * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (no treatment).
The authors thank Yoshikatsu Kanai and Hisashi Iizasa for valuable discussions. 
Ham WT, Jr, Mueller HA, Ruffolo JJ, Jr, et al. Basic mechanisms underlying the production of photochemical lesions in the mammalian retina. Curr Eye Res. 1984;3:165–174. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Shan X, Aw TY, Jones DP. Glutathione-dependent protection against oxidative injury. Pharmacol Ther. 1990;47:61–71. [PubMed]
Pan ZH, Bahring R, Grantyn R, Lipton SA. Differential modulation by sulfhydryl redox agents and glutathione of GABA- and glycine-evoked currents in rat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci. 1995;15:1384–1391. [PubMed]
Bannai S, Tateishi N. Role of membrane transport in metabolism and function of glutathione in mammals. J Membr Biol. 1986;89:1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dröge W, Eck HP, Gmünder H, Mihm S. Modulation of lymphocyte functions and immune responses by cysteine and cysteine derivatives. Am J Med. 1991;91:140S–144S.
Bannai S, Kitamura E. Transport interaction of L-cystine and L-glutamate in human diploid fibroblasts in culture. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:2372–2376. [PubMed]
Sato H, Tamba M, Ishii T, Bannai S. Cloning and expression of a plasma membrane cystine/glutamate exchange transporter composed of two distinct proteins. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:11455–11458. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bridges CC, Kekuda R, Wang H, et al. Structure, function, and regulation of human cystine/glutamate transporter in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:47–54. [PubMed]
Kim JY, Kanai Y, Chairoungdua A, et al. Human cystine/glutamate transporter: cDNA cloning and upregulation by oxidative stress in glioma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1512:335–344. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bannai S. Induction of cystine and glutamate transport activity in human fibroblasts by diethyl maleate and other electrophilic agents. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:2435–2440. [PubMed]
Hosoya K, Saeki S, Terasaki T. Activation of carrier-mediated transport of L-cystine at the blood-brain and blood-retinal barriers in vivo. Microvasc Res. 2001;62:136–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cunha-Vaz JG. The blood-retinal barriers. Doc Ophthalmol. 1976;41:287–327. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lu SC, Sun WM, Nagineni CN, Hooks JJ, Kannan R. Bidirectional glutathione transport by cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:2523–2530. [PubMed]
Harris A, Bingaman DP, Ciulla TA, Martin BJ. Retinal and choroidal blood flow in health and disease. Ryan SJ eds. 3rd ed. Retina. 2001;1:68–88. Mosby St. Louis.
Hosoya K, Tomi M, Ohtsuki S, et al. Conditionally immortalized retinal capillary endothelial cell lines (TR-iBRB) expressing differentiated endothelial cell functions derived from a transgenic rat. Exp Eye Res. 2001;72:163–172. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hosoya K, Kondo T, Tomi M, Takanaga H, Ohtsuki S, Terasaki T. MCT1-mediated transport of L-lactic acid at the inner blood-retinal barrier: a possible route for delivery of monocarboxylic acid drugs to the retina. Pharm Res. 2001;18:1669–1676. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Holash J, Stewart P. The relationship of astrocyte-like cells to the vessels that contribute to the blood-ocular barriers. Brain Res. 1993;629:218–224. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kumagai AK, Glasgow BJ, Pardridge WM. GLUT1 glucose transporter expression in the diabetic and nondiabetic human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:2887–2894. [PubMed]
Gerhart DZ, Leino RL, Drewes LR. Distribution of monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2 in rat retina. Neuroscience. 1999;92:367–375. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Terasaki T, Hosoya K. Conditionally immortalized cell lines as a new in vitro model for the study of barrier functions. Biol Pharm Bull. 2001;24:111–118. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Griffith OW. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Anal Biochem. 1980;106:207–212. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yamaoka K, Tanigawara Y, Nakagawa T, Uno T. A pharmacokinetic analysis program (multi) for microcomputer. J Pharmacobiodyn. 1981;4:879–885. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Boado RJ, Li JY, Nagaya M, Zhang C, Pardridge WM. Selective expression of the large neutral amino acid transporter at the blood-brain barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12079–12084. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yao SY, Muzyka WR, Elliott JF, Cheeseman CI, Young JD. Cloning and functional expression of a cDNA from rat jejunal epithelium encoding a protein (4F2hc) with system y+L amino acid transport activity. Biochem J. 1998;330:745–752. [PubMed]
Miura K, Ishii T, Sugita Y, Bannai S. Cystine uptake and glutathione level in endothelial cells exposed to oxidative stress. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:C50–C58. [PubMed]
Pfeiffer R, Loffing J, Rossier G, et al. Luminal heterodimeric amino acid transporter defective in cystinuria. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:4135–4147. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Devés R, Boyd CA. Surface antigen CD98(4F2): not a single membrane protein, but a family of proteins with multiple functions. J Membr Biol. 2000;173:165–177. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hjelle JT, Baird-Lambert J, Cardinale G, Specor S, Udenfriend S. Isolated microvessels: the blood-brain barrier in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:4544–4548. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nishikawa T, Edelstein D, Du XL, et al. Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycaemic damage. Nature. 2000;404:787–790. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guha M, Bai W, Nadler JL, Natarajan R. Molecular mechanisms of tumor necrosis factor α gene expression in monocytic cells through hyperglycemia-induced oxidant stress-dependent and -independent pathways. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:17728–17739. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Baynes JW, Thorpe SR. Role of oxidative stress in diabetic complications: a new perspective on an old paradigm. Diabetes. 1999;48:1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Winkler BS, Boulton ME, Gottsch JD, Sternberg P. Oxidative damage and age-related macular degeneration. Mol Vis. 1999;5:32.available at http://www.molvis.org/molvis/v5/p32/ [PubMed]
Lu S, Bao Y, Huang Z, Sarthy V, Kannan R. Regulation of γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase subunit gene expression in retinal Müller cells by oxidative stress. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1776–1782. [PubMed]
Newman E, Reichenbach A. The Müller cell: a functional element of the retina. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:307–312. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Schutte M, Werner P. Redistribution of glutathione in the ischemic rat retina. Neurosci Lett. 1998;246:53–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
RT-PCR analysis of xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B) in TR-iBRB2 cells. Lane 1: rat brain as a positive control in both xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B); lane 2: TR-iBRB2 cells; lane Image not available : in the absence of reverse transcriptase for TR-iBRB2 cells.
Figure 1.
 
RT-PCR analysis of xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B) in TR-iBRB2 cells. Lane 1: rat brain as a positive control in both xCT (A) and 4F2hc (B); lane 2: TR-iBRB2 cells; lane Image not available : in the absence of reverse transcriptase for TR-iBRB2 cells.
Figure 2.
 
Time course of [14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. [14C]L-Cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed at 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The SD bar is smaller than the size of the symbol.
Figure 2.
 
Time course of [14C]L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. [14C]L-Cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed at 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The SD bar is smaller than the size of the symbol.
Figure 3.
 
Concentration-dependence of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. The [14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was determined at 5 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). Data were subjected to Michaelis-Menten and Eadie-Scatchard analyses (inset). The K m is 9.18 ± 3.18 μM, V max is 75.4 ± 10.8 pmol/(min · mg protein), and P non is 0.410 ± 0.029μ L/(min · mg protein) (mean ± SD).
Figure 3.
 
Concentration-dependence of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells. The [14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was determined at 5 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). Data were subjected to Michaelis-Menten and Eadie-Scatchard analyses (inset). The K m is 9.18 ± 3.18 μM, V max is 75.4 ± 10.8 pmol/(min · mg protein), and P non is 0.410 ± 0.029μ L/(min · mg protein) (mean ± SD).
Figure 4.
 
Lineweaver-Burk plot of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells showing competitive inhibition by L-glutamic acid. The[ 14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed in the presence or absence of 300 μM L-glutamic acid at 10 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The K i for L-glutamic acid is 142 ± 18 μM (mean ± SD).
Figure 4.
 
Lineweaver-Burk plot of L-cystine uptake by TR-iBRB2 cells showing competitive inhibition by L-glutamic acid. The[ 14C]L-cystine (1.7 μM) uptake was performed in the presence or absence of 300 μM L-glutamic acid at 10 minutes and 37°C. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 4). The K i for L-glutamic acid is 142 ± 18 μM (mean ± SD).
Figure 5.
 
Time-dependence of DEM treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (at time 0). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of[ 14C]L-cystine uptake; (○), intracellular glutathione concentration. The DEM concentration was 100μ M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (at time 0).
Figure 5.
 
Time-dependence of DEM treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (at time 0). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of[ 14C]L-cystine uptake; (○), intracellular glutathione concentration. The DEM concentration was 100μ M. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,*** P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (at time 0).
Figure 6.
 
Concentration-dependence of diethyl maleate (DEM) treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (no treatment). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of [14C]L-cystine uptake; (○) intracellular glutathione concentration. DEM treatment was applied for 24 hours. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3–6). * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (no treatment).
Figure 6.
 
Concentration-dependence of diethyl maleate (DEM) treatment on mRNA expression, L-cystine uptake, and glutathione concentration in TR-iBRB2 cells. (A) (•) xCT; (○) 4F2hc; (▪) GLUT1 mRNA expression levels. Each mRNA expression level was normalized by the GAPDH mRNA expression and plotted as a relative ratio to the control (no treatment). (B) (•) Cell-to-medium ratio of [14C]L-cystine uptake; (○) intracellular glutathione concentration. DEM treatment was applied for 24 hours. Each point represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3–6). * P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, significantly different from the control (no treatment).
Table 1.
 
Oligonucleotide Primers Used for PCR Amplification of cDNAs
Table 1.
 
Oligonucleotide Primers Used for PCR Amplification of cDNAs
Target mRNA Upstream Primer (5′ to 3′) Downstream Primer (5′ to 3′) Product Size (bp)
xCT CCTGGCATTTGGACGCTACAT TCAGAATTGCTGTGAGCTTGCA 182
4F2hc CTCCCAGGAAGATTTTAAAGACCTTCT TTCATTTTGGTGGCTACAATGTCAG 141
GLUT1 GATGATGAACCTGTTGGCCT AGCGGAACAGCTCCAAGATG 503
GAPDH TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG TCCTTGGAGGCCATGTAGGCCAT 240
Table 2.
 
Effect of Several Inhibitors on[ 14C]l-cystine Uptake by TR-iBRB2 Cells
Table 2.
 
Effect of Several Inhibitors on[ 14C]l-cystine Uptake by TR-iBRB2 Cells
Inhibitors No Pretreatment DEM Pretreatment
No pretreatment control 100 ± 3
DEM pretreatment control 100 ± 4
1 mM L-Cystine 3.19 ± 0.23* 3.20 ± 0.04*
1 mM D-Cystine 51.9 ± 2.8* ND
2.5 mM L-Glutamic acid 9.67 ± 0.52* 19.3 ± 0.6*
2.5 mM D-Glutamic acid 73.0 ± 3.2, † ND
2.5 mM L-α-Aminoadipic acid 10.9 ± 0.6* 19.3 ± 0.6*
2.5 mM L-Homocysteic acid 7.62 ± 0.83* 6.12 ± 0.15*
2.5 mM L-Quisqualic acid 19.2 ± 0.6* 13.5 ± 0.4*
2.5 mM L-Aspartic acid 89.7 ± 2.8 86.7 ± 3.5
2.5 mM L-Leucine 83.0 ± 7.2 ND
2.5 mM L-Arginine 104 ± 7 101 ± 2
2.5 mM L-Lysine 76.5 ± 4.2, ‡ ND
2.5 mM γ-Aminobutyric acid 94.0 ± 2.4 ND
2.5 mM p-Aminohippuric acid 99.7 ± 1.1 ND
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×